ImageImageImageImageImage

Official Trade Thread XVIII: 1/20/12 - 5/14/12

Moderators: nate33, montestewart, LyricalRico

McGully Culkin
Sophomore
Posts: 184
And1: 19
Joined: Oct 09, 2008

Re: Official Trade Thread XVIII 

Post#921 » by McGully Culkin » Wed Feb 29, 2012 7:41 pm

SUPERBALLMAN wrote:
fishercob wrote:I continue to think that Blatche for Ben Gordon has to make sense for the Pistons. They have by far the most future salary committed of any bad team in the league -- already at $63M (!) for next year -- and that's without a high draft pick and perhaps a high second rounder too. That payroll is one thing if you're a quasi-contender or even a playoff team. But for as crappy as they are I just don't see how they can afford to not make some cost-cutting moves.



I'd really like to somehow pickup Detroit's pick. What about something like this... Lewis, McGee, 2nd round pick to Detroit for Gordon, Villanueva, Daye, 1st round pick?

Detroit gets out of the Gordon/Villanueva money a year earlier, get McGee to pair inside w/ Monroe. Plus another trade option I think is possible, but not sure, is Wizards could amnesty Lewis and essentially deal the empty cap space to Detroit and just absorb the Gordon/Villenueva contracts if Detroit doesn't want Lewis' 1 yr deal. Wizards add a couple proven vets to their roster, add Daye and another high pick.



And if we deal McGee, what's the realistic plan to fill the void at the 5? As frustrating as he is, i'm not for trading him if there isn't some sort of feasable replacement ready to go a the center position.
User avatar
Illuminaire
Veteran
Posts: 2,970
And1: 606
Joined: Jan 04, 2010
 

Re: Official Trade Thread XVIII 

Post#922 » by Illuminaire » Wed Feb 29, 2012 8:09 pm

Dallas might deal Haywood for nothing if we can absorb the cap space, especially if Howard is a free agent.

Heck, they'd probably throw in sweetener.
Severn Hoos
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,443
And1: 223
Joined: May 09, 2002

Re: Official Trade Thread XVIII 

Post#923 » by Severn Hoos » Wed Feb 29, 2012 8:19 pm

Wouldn't that be something? And while I'd really love to see Haywood anchoring the middle with Davis at his side, Brendan's best days are behind him (and, sadly, were all but wasted here). 3 more years? Ouch, not sure I can sign off on that one, and I was always right there with nate as one of BTH's biggest supporters.
"A society that puts equality - in the sense of equality of outcome - ahead of freedom will end up with neither equality nor freedom. The use of force to achieve equality will destroy freedom" Milton Friedman, Free to Choose
User avatar
Nivek
Head Coach
Posts: 7,406
And1: 959
Joined: Sep 29, 2010
Contact:
         

Re: Official Trade Thread XVIII 

Post#924 » by Nivek » Wed Feb 29, 2012 8:21 pm

McGully Culkin wrote:

And if we deal McGee, what's the realistic plan to fill the void at the 5? As frustrating as he is, i'm not for trading him if there isn't some sort of feasable replacement ready to go a the center position.


This doesn't make sense to me. If you're convinced McGee is NOT the answer at center, there's no point in keeping him around if you can trade him for something of value. Who's going to replace McGee at center if they trade him? Someone else.
"A lot of what we call talent is the desire to practice."
-- Malcolm Gladwell

Check out my blog about the Wizards, movies, writing, music, TV, sports, and whatever else comes to mind.
McGully Culkin
Sophomore
Posts: 184
And1: 19
Joined: Oct 09, 2008

Re: Official Trade Thread XVIII 

Post#925 » by McGully Culkin » Wed Feb 29, 2012 8:24 pm

Nivek wrote:
McGully Culkin wrote:

And if we deal McGee, what's the realistic plan to fill the void at the 5? As frustrating as he is, i'm not for trading him if there isn't some sort of feasable replacement ready to go a the center position.


This doesn't make sense to me. If you're convinced McGee is NOT the answer at center, there's no point in keeping him around if you can trade him for something of value. Who's going to replace McGee at center if they trade him? Someone else.


Where'd I say that I was convinced that he wasn't the answer at center?

All I'm saying is that trading McGee with NO plan as far as who is going to replace him at the 5, is foolish.
queridiculo
RealGM
Posts: 17,944
And1: 9,328
Joined: Mar 29, 2005
Location: So long Wizturdz.
   

Re: Official Trade Thread XVIII 

Post#926 » by queridiculo » Wed Feb 29, 2012 8:32 pm

McGully Culkin wrote:Where'd I say that I was convinced that he wasn't the answer at center?

All I'm saying is that trading McGee with NO plan as far as who is going to replace him at the 5, is foolish.


The assumption is that if McGee is traded, the decision has been made that he's not a fit for this organization going forward.

Once that decision has been made, who cares whose replacing McGee? In the interim you play who you have and address the position during the offseason.
Dat2U
RealGM
Posts: 24,226
And1: 8,058
Joined: Jun 23, 2001
Location: Columbus, OH
       

Re: Official Trade Thread XVIII 

Post#927 » by Dat2U » Wed Feb 29, 2012 8:47 pm

fishercob wrote:I continue to think that Blatche for Ben Gordon has to make sense for the Pistons. They have by far the most future salary committed of any bad team in the league -- already at $63M (!) for next year -- and that's without a high draft pick and perhaps a high second rounder too. That payroll is one thing if you're a quasi-contender or even a playoff team. But for as crappy as they are I just don't see how they can afford to not make some cost-cutting moves.


Honestly I'd rather amnesty Blatche than deal him for a crappy player on a bad contract. Gordon has been just terrible the last few years. I see no benefit from having Gordon or Villanueva on our roster or in our rotation.
Dat2U
RealGM
Posts: 24,226
And1: 8,058
Joined: Jun 23, 2001
Location: Columbus, OH
       

Re: Official Trade Thread XVIII 

Post#928 » by Dat2U » Wed Feb 29, 2012 8:48 pm

I guess my favorite move would be Singleton & Blatche for Marvin Williams if we some how could pull that off.
User avatar
Illuminaire
Veteran
Posts: 2,970
And1: 606
Joined: Jan 04, 2010
 

Re: Official Trade Thread XVIII 

Post#929 » by Illuminaire » Wed Feb 29, 2012 8:54 pm

Severn Hoos wrote:Wouldn't that be something? And while I'd really love to see Haywood anchoring the middle with Davis at his side, Brendan's best days are behind him (and, sadly, were all but wasted here). 3 more years? Ouch, not sure I can sign off on that one, and I was always right there with nate as one of BTH's biggest supporters.


I'd consider him if we were getting the Detroit pick, though, or another high lottery with a chance to be top-3. In that case we'd be hopefully drafting a PF/C and Haywood would be a placeholder.

In all other cases, I agree with you.
fishercob
RealGM
Posts: 13,922
And1: 1,571
Joined: Apr 25, 2002
Location: Tenleytown, DC

Re: Official Trade Thread XVIII 

Post#930 » by fishercob » Wed Feb 29, 2012 9:46 pm

Dat2U wrote:
fishercob wrote:I continue to think that Blatche for Ben Gordon has to make sense for the Pistons. They have by far the most future salary committed of any bad team in the league -- already at $63M (!) for next year -- and that's without a high draft pick and perhaps a high second rounder too. That payroll is one thing if you're a quasi-contender or even a playoff team. But for as crappy as they are I just don't see how they can afford to not make some cost-cutting moves.


Honestly I'd rather amnesty Blatche than deal him for a crappy player on a bad contract. Gordon has been just terrible the last few years. I see no benefit from having Gordon or Villanueva on our roster or in our rotation.


I don't think Gordon is a totally crappy player. He's just on a bad contract. Dude still shoots lights out from 3. He's been terribly miscast in Detroit. I think he'd fit in quite well playing off of John and his contract is shorter than Dray's. Also, whether or not you are I would rather amnesty Dray isn't relevant; despite the cap relief, ownership would still have to pay Dray a lot of money to go away. Getting someone who can actually play might be more palatable.


I guess my favorite move would be Singleton & Blatche for Marvin Williams if we some how could pull that off.


That's definitely preferable, but why would ATL trade a decent player for a bad one who makes comparable money but for more years?
"Some people have a way with words....some people....not have way."
— Steve Martin
fishercob
RealGM
Posts: 13,922
And1: 1,571
Joined: Apr 25, 2002
Location: Tenleytown, DC

Re: Official Trade Thread XVIII 

Post#931 » by fishercob » Wed Feb 29, 2012 9:49 pm

Severn Hoos wrote:Wouldn't that be something? And while I'd really love to see Haywood anchoring the middle with Davis at his side, Brendan's best days are behind him (and, sadly, were all but wasted here). 3 more years? Ouch, not sure I can sign off on that one, and I was always right there with nate as one of BTH's biggest supporters.


I'd definitely sign Haywood if Dallas amnesties him. The rumor/conventional wisdom is that they are going to try to trade Marion and amnesty BTH so they can pursue Williams and Howard.
"Some people have a way with words....some people....not have way."
— Steve Martin
Severn Hoos
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,443
And1: 223
Joined: May 09, 2002

Re: Official Trade Thread XVIII 

Post#932 » by Severn Hoos » Wed Feb 29, 2012 9:53 pm

Ah. Right. Amnesty candidate and all that. In that case, I heartily approve. Carry on.



[Imagine BTH as the backstop of a Joerger-designed defense? Yeah, that could work for a couple years... Not that he'd come back to DC, mind you, but fun to imagine.]
"A society that puts equality - in the sense of equality of outcome - ahead of freedom will end up with neither equality nor freedom. The use of force to achieve equality will destroy freedom" Milton Friedman, Free to Choose
User avatar
Nivek
Head Coach
Posts: 7,406
And1: 959
Joined: Sep 29, 2010
Contact:
         

Re: Official Trade Thread XVIII 

Post#933 » by Nivek » Wed Feb 29, 2012 10:14 pm

McGully Culkin wrote:
Nivek wrote:
McGully Culkin wrote:

And if we deal McGee, what's the realistic plan to fill the void at the 5? As frustrating as he is, i'm not for trading him if there isn't some sort of feasable replacement ready to go a the center position.


This doesn't make sense to me. If you're convinced McGee is NOT the answer at center, there's no point in keeping him around if you can trade him for something of value. Who's going to replace McGee at center if they trade him? Someone else.


Where'd I say that I was convinced that he wasn't the answer at center?

All I'm saying is that trading McGee with NO plan as far as who is going to replace him at the 5, is foolish.


Sorry -- I didn't mean YOU specifically. I was using "you're" in a generic sense.

As for needing a specific person in mind to replace McGee before trading him -- I still don't agree. :) The "plan" can be "find someone else."

Foolish would be giving McGee something like $10 million a year because the team was afraid it wouldn't be able to find someone else to play center. The goal is to get someone GOOD. A team can lose with anyone. And they don't have to pay a lot to do it.
"A lot of what we call talent is the desire to practice."
-- Malcolm Gladwell

Check out my blog about the Wizards, movies, writing, music, TV, sports, and whatever else comes to mind.
LyricalRico
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 30,570
And1: 854
Joined: May 23, 2002
Location: Back into the fray!
Contact:
       

Re: Official Trade Thread XVIII 

Post#934 » by LyricalRico » Wed Feb 29, 2012 10:42 pm

With no FAs likely wanting to come here in the near future, I think adding vets that are on deals that are up when Wall's extension would kick in is the way to go. That way the team start winning and then has the flexibility to add pieces once it is an attractive destination.

Wizards trade: Lewis, McGee, Young, Seraphin, and Singleton
Wizards receive: Ellis, Biedrins, and M.Williams

Warriors trade: Ellis, Biedrins, and Wright
Warriors receive: Lewis, McGee, Young, and Singleton

Hawks trade: M.Williams
Hawks receive: Wright and Seraphin

Atlanta adds a shooter on a cheaper contract, plus a young big. GSW cuts salary and tries to fill their void in the middle. The Wiz add 3 veteran starters and still have a starting PF spot with Davis' name on it.

For now:
Biedrins/Turiaf
Booker/Vesely
Williams/Evans
Ellis/Crawford
Wall/Mack

Potential 2012-13 lineup
Biedrins/Vesely (assuming he bulks up)
Davis/Booker
Williams/FA
Ellis/Crawford
Wall/FA (need to add a vet here)

Again, not a title contender, but good enough to begin the change to a winning culture. Then by the time Wall/Davis are ready to compete, they will have the cap space to make something happen. I'm assuming we continue to try to dump Blatche before amnestying him.
queridiculo
RealGM
Posts: 17,944
And1: 9,328
Joined: Mar 29, 2005
Location: So long Wizturdz.
   

Re: Official Trade Thread XVIII 

Post#935 » by queridiculo » Wed Feb 29, 2012 10:58 pm

I have a hard time with the concept that adding players from another dysfunctional organization somehow contributes to a winning culture.

Ellis is one of the purest scorers in the game, but he's also entitled and selfish enough to blow the team apart just as well as Blatche can with his apathy and lack of work ethic.

NO THANKS.

I'm also getting quite annoyed by the assertion that FAs may not want to come here.

Are the Wizards a likely destination for vets looking to join a winning team? Probably not, but that doesn't mean that younger players around the league stuck behind other starters or FAs from teams hard up against the salary cap aren't going to entertain signing here for a nice payday and a chance to establish themselves in the league.

The way this CBA is shaping up, salary cap space is at a premium. Washington may not be able to take advantage of it this upcoming offseason, but come 2013 Washington could be one of very few destinations with the right combination of talent and salary cap space to attract Tier1 FAs.

Btw, I'd consider any deal for Marvin Williams that doesn't include a 1st round pick and McGee.
LyricalRico
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 30,570
And1: 854
Joined: May 23, 2002
Location: Back into the fray!
Contact:
       

Re: Official Trade Thread XVIII 

Post#936 » by LyricalRico » Thu Mar 1, 2012 2:25 am

^ Well, what I was thinking when I was typing "winning culture" was really just "more wins". This move isn't going to turn us into the Spurs, I understand that. But it would IMO get this team could get into the 35-40 win territory next season and position them to take another step the following season. Then you're looking at asking FAs to join a 7th or 8th seed playoff team on the rise instead of a young team with a terrible record that's saying "yeah we still suck but look at all the first round picks on our roster, maybe we'll be good one day so give us a shot".
User avatar
nate33
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 70,795
And1: 23,324
Joined: Oct 28, 2002

Re: Official Trade Thread XVIII 

Post#937 » by nate33 » Thu Mar 1, 2012 2:36 am

fishercob wrote:
Dat2U wrote:
fishercob wrote:I continue to think that Blatche for Ben Gordon has to make sense for the Pistons. They have by far the most future salary committed of any bad team in the league -- already at $63M (!) for next year -- and that's without a high draft pick and perhaps a high second rounder too. That payroll is one thing if you're a quasi-contender or even a playoff team. But for as crappy as they are I just don't see how they can afford to not make some cost-cutting moves.


Honestly I'd rather amnesty Blatche than deal him for a crappy player on a bad contract. Gordon has been just terrible the last few years. I see no benefit from having Gordon or Villanueva on our roster or in our rotation.


I don't think Gordon is a totally crappy player. He's just on a bad contract. Dude still shoots lights out from 3. He's been terribly miscast in Detroit. I think he'd fit in quite well playing off of John and his contract is shorter than Dray's. Also, whether or not you are I would rather amnesty Dray isn't relevant; despite the cap relief, ownership would still have to pay Dray a lot of money to go away. Getting someone who can actually play might be more palatable.

Exactly. People need to realize that it's extremely unlikely that Ted is going to cough up $23M just to make Blatche go away. A much better resolution would be to trade Blatche for a mediocre player like Gordon who at least isn't a negative influence in the locker room and he provides a skill desperately needed on this team.
fugop
Veteran
Posts: 2,744
And1: 9
Joined: Aug 09, 2004

Re: Official Trade Thread XVIII 

Post#938 » by fugop » Thu Mar 1, 2012 2:40 am

I still think a trade with Houston for Patrick Patterson is in order. McGee & Blatche for Patterson & Thabeet.
hands11
Banned User
Posts: 31,171
And1: 2,444
Joined: May 16, 2005

Re: Official Trade Thread XVIII 

Post#939 » by hands11 » Thu Mar 1, 2012 3:02 am

hermitkid wrote:I have a hard time with the concept that adding players from another dysfunctional organization somehow contributes to a winning culture.

Ellis is one of the purest scorers in the game, but he's also entitled and selfish enough to blow the team apart just as well as Blatche can with his apathy and lack of work ethic.

NO THANKS.

I'm also getting quite annoyed by the assertion that FAs may not want to come here.

Are the Wizards a likely destination for vets looking to join a winning team? Probably not, but that doesn't mean that younger players around the league stuck behind other starters or FAs from teams hard up against the salary cap aren't going to entertain signing here for a nice payday and a chance to establish themselves in the league.

The way this CBA is shaping up, salary cap space is at a premium. Washington may not be able to take advantage of it this upcoming offseason, but come 2013 Washington could be one of very few destinations with the right combination of talent and salary cap space to attract Tier1 FAs.

Btw, I'd consider any deal for Marvin Williams that doesn't include a 1st round pick and McGee.


With Wall playing better and finally finding his shot, players will come here and get paid.
jivelikenice
Analyst
Posts: 3,074
And1: 145
Joined: Jul 15, 2005

Re: Official Trade Thread XVIII 

Post#940 » by jivelikenice » Thu Mar 1, 2012 3:29 am

fugop wrote:I still think a trade with Houston for Patrick Patterson is in order. McGee & Blatche for Patterson & Thabeet.


not big on that deal. I haven't seen Patterson much admittedly but I don't see him as better than Booker or a better option than a Robinson or Davis in the draft. Eventually he'd be buried on the bench here...

Return to Washington Wizards