Page 1 of 2
Are the Wizards better without John Wall?
Posted: Wed Nov 17, 2010 1:53 am
by JWizmentality
Discuss.
Re: Are the Wizards better without John Wall?
Posted: Wed Nov 17, 2010 1:53 am
by MJG
Obviously. What's to discuss?
Re: Are the Wizards better without John Wall?
Posted: Wed Nov 17, 2010 1:55 am
by Wizards2Lottery
Everyone knows the answer is yes. Lock this thread. Wall is a ball hog who commits too many turnovers. Plus he's not Rajon Rando.
IBTL
Re: Are the Wizards better without John Wall?
Posted: Wed Nov 17, 2010 1:59 am
by Donkey McDonkerton
I love this place.
What do you think we could get for him? Cousins or Favors?
Re: Are the Wizards better without John Wall?
Posted: Wed Nov 17, 2010 2:08 am
by Halcyon
He's on the downslope of his career, time to trade him while we can.
Re: Are the Wizards better without John Wall?
Posted: Wed Nov 17, 2010 2:09 am
by Donkey McDonkerton
Injury prone
Re: Are the Wizards better without John Wall?
Posted: Wed Nov 17, 2010 2:14 am
by Neotropics
Uhh no. They are playing TORONTO... the worst team in the NBA.
Re: Are the Wizards better without John Wall?
Posted: Wed Nov 17, 2010 2:14 am
by fishercob
Dude, you beat me to it. I was seriously about to post this. Good times.
Re: Are the Wizards better without John Wall?
Posted: Wed Nov 17, 2010 2:19 am
by JWizmentality
Neotropics wrote:Uhh no. They are playing TORONTO... the worst team in the NBA.
DING DING DING!!! We have a winner! The first sarcasm incapable!
Re: Are the Wizards better without John Wall?
Posted: Wed Nov 17, 2010 2:23 am
by TGW
We should trade him for a capable small forward like a Sonny Weems or Wilson Chandler.
Re: Are the Wizards better without John Wall?
Posted: Wed Nov 17, 2010 2:29 am
by Nivek
Addition by subtraction. Just cut him. He'd probably end up signing with the Heat, and then he can infect them.
Re: Are the Wizards better without John Wall?
Posted: Wed Nov 17, 2010 2:31 am
by Severn Hoos
Colin? Is that you? Time to get back to the Herd....
Re: Are the Wizards better without John Wall?
Posted: Wed Nov 17, 2010 2:32 am
by dlts20
buy him out. He's the worst thing to happened to this Franchise in a long time
Re: Are the Wizards better without John Wall?
Posted: Wed Nov 17, 2010 3:48 am
by Wizardspride
In all seriousness, what do you think we could get for Wall IF we put him on the market?
I'm not advocating it but I am curious about his value.

I'm kidding.......

Re: Are the Wizards better without John Wall?
Posted: Wed Nov 17, 2010 4:48 am
by bulletproof_32
The Washington Wizards are undefeated without him so I think that answers the question.
The Dakota Wizards might be able to use him, though.
Re: Are the Wizards better without John Wall?
Posted: Wed Nov 17, 2010 5:09 am
by RickRoll_inDC
Neotropics wrote:Uhh no. They are playing TORONTO... the worst team in the NBA.
lol. noobies who don't know our traditions.
Sarcasm, my friend. Sarcasm.
Re: Are the Wizards better without John Wall?
Posted: Wed Nov 17, 2010 5:50 am
by Negrodamus
Does anyone think its ironic that Wall/Reebok makes an emphasis about his new shoe line giving him "more game and less pain" and his first notable injury is one with his foot?
Re: Are the Wizards better without John Wall?
Posted: Wed Nov 17, 2010 6:26 am
by Jimmy Recard
Neotropics wrote:Uhh no. They are playing TORONTO... the worst team in the NBA.
LOL he got waived for that? I knew you could get banned for trolling, I didn't know you could get banned for idiocy

Edit: Oh i see now...
viewtopic.php?f=32&t=1067582
Re: Are the Wizards better without John Wall?
Posted: Wed Nov 17, 2010 6:48 am
by montestewart
Neotropics is playing everybody. His shtick is vintage Andy Kaufman. Sarcasm cubed.
Re: Are the Wizards better without John Wall?
Posted: Wed Nov 17, 2010 9:28 pm
by VA_story
Ernie needs to get on the jack right now and get something done! Maybe we should go after Turner. The analyst were right...he's more "NBA ready."