The Black hole (or something) gets deeper
Posted: Thu Mar 31, 2011 6:50 pm
Sev will like this
So Pinochet ended up facing justice for what he did in Chile.
Shouldn't Friedman (if not deceased) been a co-conspirator.
How do the neo-lib economists keep getting away with using
crisis, perceived or real, sometimes ones of their own making,
to undemocratically enact policies that had NOTHING to do
with the actual causes of the crisis? It's happened over and
over and the results have been ugly to criminal.
If we want to talk about a flat tax, why not a flat tax on wealth
rather than income?
So Pinochet ended up facing justice for what he did in Chile.
Shouldn't Friedman (if not deceased) been a co-conspirator.
How do the neo-lib economists keep getting away with using
crisis, perceived or real, sometimes ones of their own making,
to undemocratically enact policies that had NOTHING to do
with the actual causes of the crisis? It's happened over and
over and the results have been ugly to criminal.
If we want to talk about a flat tax, why not a flat tax on wealth
rather than income?