Page 1 of 2

Are the wizards better without Wall?

Posted: Sat Apr 2, 2011 1:33 am
by Donkey McDonkerton
we have Jordan!

Re: Are the wizards better without Wall?

Posted: Sat Apr 2, 2011 1:38 am
by Jay81
I would trade John Wall for Cousins right now

Re: Are the wizards better without Wall?

Posted: Sat Apr 2, 2011 1:42 am
by Benjammin
Absolutely the Wizards are better without Wall...as long as they can play the Cavs 82 games a year and in the playoffs also.

Re: Are the wizards better without Wall?

Posted: Sat Apr 2, 2011 1:43 am
by GhostsOfGil
april fools?

Re: Are the wizards better without Wall?

Posted: Sat Apr 2, 2011 2:03 am
by Dark Faze
Might as well have said this about any of the top point guards if you compare them to Crawford. I mean none of them (Paul, Williams, possibly Rose but not sure) went off for some of the crazy nights he has in just a week or so as a Wiz.

Does that mean Crawford is potentially great? That he's putting up huge numbers at the late end of the season?

The answer is to come back next year with Young and let everyone battle for minutes when the record is reset to 0-0 and we aren't playing with zero pressure.

Re: Are the wizards better without Wall?

Posted: Sat Apr 2, 2011 2:18 am
by spaceman_E
Crawford is the Courtney Alexander of 2011.

Re: Are the wizards better without Wall?

Posted: Sat Apr 2, 2011 2:32 am
by ST21
i really hope this thread is not serious.

Re: Are the wizards better without Wall?

Posted: Sat Apr 2, 2011 2:36 am
by Chocolate City Jordanaire
ST21 wrote:i really hope this thread is not serious.

You didn't know the deal was already made TODAY?

Re: Are the wizards better without Wall?

Posted: Sat Apr 2, 2011 2:48 am
by dobrojim
don't be silly

Re: Are the wizards better without Wall?

Posted: Sat Apr 2, 2011 2:52 am
by pineappleheadindc
Everyone stop.

Look who the thread starter is.

It's Donkey.

Come on. Let Donkey be Donkey. But don't you guys lose your heads over reacting to this thread with any sense of seriousness.

:nonono:

Re: Are the wizards better without Wall?

Posted: Sat Apr 2, 2011 3:06 am
by RickRoll_inDC
APRIL FOOLS!

Re: Are the wizards better without Wall?

Posted: Sat Apr 2, 2011 3:25 am
by hands11
Donkey McDonkerton wrote:we have Jordan!


Is it a board tradition. Someone had to start this thread :D

Re: Are the wizards better without Wall?

Posted: Sat Apr 2, 2011 3:55 am
by Donkey McDonkerton
well, its a valid question...check out this sample size.

In the last 2 games we are 1-1...we won without him and lost with him.

Re: Are the wizards better without Wall?

Posted: Sat Apr 2, 2011 12:17 pm
by DaRealHibachi
Ofcourse we are, trade Wall for Cousins; Dynasty stuff right there...

Re: Are the wizards better without Wall?

Posted: Sat Apr 2, 2011 6:16 pm
by Donkey McDonkerton
DaRealHibachi wrote:Ofcourse we are, trade Wall for Cousins; Dynasty stuff right there...


Yep...and blatche for Childress and we may have a title contender.

Mcgee
Cousins
Childress
Jeffers
Crawdaddy

NY 6th man of the year Eastern conf champs!

Re: Are the wizards better without Wall?

Posted: Sat Apr 2, 2011 11:12 pm
by kirubel94
Heres my question,
Is this a real question?

Re: Are the wizards better without Wall?

Posted: Sun Apr 3, 2011 1:12 am
by Donkey McDonkerton
kirubel94 wrote:Heres my question,
Is this a real question?


Here is my answer, do you think its a real question?

Re: Are the wizards better without Wall?

Posted: Sun Apr 3, 2011 1:34 am
by hands11
Structurally. It does look like a real question. It as the ? thingy at the end of it.

Re: Are the wizards better without Wall?

Posted: Sun Apr 3, 2011 1:42 am
by tontoz
Image

Re: Are the wizards better without Wall?

Posted: Sun Apr 3, 2011 4:04 am
by Hoopalotta
That the majority would take this as anything other than the verbal quintessence of a rubber chicken is an irrefutable testament to a grossly dilapidated state of our collective sarcagntion suite. Do we need to go back to green font? Is that what you all want? Because we can do that if you can't handle this. Don't make me stop the car.

"Are we better without [the guy who we obviously are not better without]" threads are simply a piece of the history here; the cultural bedrock that gives our lives context and relevance.