Page 1 of 4
For the record, it's Wittman, not Whitman
Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2013 5:19 pm
by dobrojim
sorry. I know I made the mistake a few times myself. That
said, we're fans of the team. We should get it right.
What's next, Whall, Beel, Whebster?

I know, I need to lighten up. It's just a BB.
Carry on.
Re: For the record, it's Wittman, not Whitman
Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2013 5:26 pm
by pancakes3
I consciously type "Randy" instead of his last name because I don't want to screw it up. Now I see it was for good reason. Beware the grammar wrath of Dobro.
Re: For the record, it's Wittman, not Whitman
Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2013 5:51 pm
by miller31time
While we're on the subject....
They're going to the game tonight.
Mike and John are going to meet Tim and Adam
there.
Tim and Adam will bring
their Washington Wizards hats to the game.

Re: For the record, it's Wittman, not Whitman
Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2013 6:02 pm
by BigA
miller31time wrote:While we're on the subject....
They're going to the game tonight.
Mike and John are going to meet Tim and Adam
there.
Tim and Adam will bring
their Washington Wizards hats to the game.

Written English needs an overhaul as we get further into the "post-literate" age. If we went to a common spelling of "they're," "there" and "their," we could cut misspelling significantly. I think all three should be spelled "thare."
Re: For the record, it's Wittman, not Whitman
Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2013 6:05 pm
by GhostsOfGil
This reminds me of the time Steve Buckhantz taught us how to properly pronunce Nene's name.
Re: For the record, it's Wittman, not Whitman
Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2013 6:10 pm
by miller31time
BigA wrote:miller31time wrote:While we're on the subject....
They're going to the game tonight.
Mike and John are going to meet Tim and Adam
there.
Tim and Adam will bring
their Washington Wizards hats to the game.

Written English needs an overhaul as we get further into the "post-literate" age. If we went to a common spelling of "they're," "there" and "their," we could cut misspelling significantly. I think all three should be spelled "thare."
I refuse to pander to the "YOLO" crowd.
Re: For the record, it's Wittman, not Whitman
Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2013 6:19 pm
by AFM
Remember, when speaking to John or Ves, it's "you're" a bust, "you're" a bust, not "your" a bust
Re: For the record, it's Wittman, not Whitman
Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2013 6:20 pm
by Severn Hoos
Way to stand firm, miller. We're behind you all the way! (well, everyone but JWiz, I presume...)

Re: For the record, it's Wittman, not Whitman
Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2013 6:26 pm
by ST21
my biggest pet peeve is when people say "i could care less"
Re: For the record, it's Wittman, not Whitman
Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2013 6:28 pm
by dobrojim
AFM wrote:Remember, when speaking to John or Ves, it's "you're" a bust, "you're" a bust, not "your" a bust
you didn't use green so I'm taking the bait
I think we all, most of us, use slang at times.
edit to add - I GOT NO PROBLEM WITH THAT.

I see that as totally different than not knowing the correct
spelling of the name of your coach.
re they're there and their, I'd say sometimes my fingers don't
type the right thing even though I know better. Same thing
with your and you're (among others).
there is also an edit function which can be used as needed.
Thinking of someone in particular here.
Re: For the record, it's Wittman, not Whitman
Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2013 6:28 pm
by GhostsOfGil
AFM wrote:Remember, when speaking to John or Ves, it's "you're" a bust, "you're" a bust, not "your" a bust
Because "he a bust, he a bust" is grammatically correct as well.

Re: For the record, it's Wittman, not Whitman
Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2013 6:31 pm
by AFM
"he a bust" is the only correct way to denote a player as a bust.
Re: For the record, it's Wittman, not Whitman
Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2013 6:33 pm
by nate33
And it's "moot" point not "mute" point. A mute point would be one that was inaudible.
Re: For the record, it's Wittman, not Whitman
Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2013 6:36 pm
by montestewart
It's Wilt Wittman, not Walt Whitman!
Re: For the record, it's Wittman, not Whitman
Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2013 6:43 pm
by dobrojim
nate33 wrote:And it's "moot" point not "mute" point. A mute point would be one that was inaudible.
reminds me of an old friend who used to talk about someone
giving a violent effort.
Re: For the record, it's Wittman, not Whitman
Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2013 6:52 pm
by BigA
AFM wrote:Remember, when speaking to John or Ves, it's "you're" a bust, "you're" a bust, not "your" a bust
No, I think it's "YOU a bust."
And if John or Ves was referring to himself, it would be "I a bust" rather than "Me a bust."
Re: For the record, it's Wittman, not Whitman
Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2013 6:59 pm
by Severn Hoos
dobrojim wrote:nate33 wrote:And it's "moot" point not "mute" point. A mute point would be one that was inaudible.
reminds me of an old friend who used to talk about someone
giving a violent effort.
My boss likes to talk about different people being in "violent agreement." Drives the Europeans mad. ALmost to the point where they are ready to validate the "violent" part.
Re: For the record, it's Wittman, not Whitman
Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2013 6:59 pm
by GhostsOfGil
It's Baltche not Blatche.
Re: For the record, it's Wittman, not Whitman
Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2013 7:01 pm
by BigA
My favorite is "for all intensive purposes."