nuposse04 wrote:Jennings would make sure we never actually contend.
Great analysis!
Moderators: LyricalRico, nate33, montestewart
nuposse04 wrote:Jennings would make sure we never actually contend.
fishercob wrote:nuposse04 wrote:Jennings would make sure we never actually contend.
Great analysis!
Ruzious wrote:I don't like the idea of playing Monroe at PF. It hasn't worked for 2 years at Detroit, and Asik is no better offensively than Drummond. And Jennings - despite being talented - is toxic to winning.
Maybe if we could do some kind of 3 way - where we get Monroe and give up Gorty and something else, that could help.
LyricalRico wrote:Ruzious wrote:I don't like the idea of playing Monroe at PF. It hasn't worked for 2 years at Detroit, and Asik is no better offensively than Drummond. And Jennings - despite being talented - is toxic to winning.
Maybe if we could do some kind of 3 way - where we get Monroe and give up Gorty and something else, that could help.
Do we then hold onto Nene to play alongside Monroe? I'd prefer to get an athletic shot blocker at PF if we're going to have Monroe at C. Not sure who that might be, though.
Ruzious wrote:I don't like the idea of playing Monroe at PF. It hasn't worked for 2 years at Detroit, and Asik is no better offensively than Drummond. And Jennings - despite being talented - is toxic to winning.
LyricalRico wrote:Ruzious wrote:I don't like the idea of playing Monroe at PF. It hasn't worked for 2 years at Detroit, and Asik is no better offensively than Drummond. And Jennings - despite being talented - is toxic to winning.
Maybe if we could do some kind of 3 way - where we get Monroe and give up Gorty and something else, that could help.
Do we then hold onto Nene to play alongside Monroe? I'd prefer to get an athletic shot blocker at PF if we're going to have Monroe at C. Not sure who that might be, though.