Political Roundtable Part VIII
Posted: Fri Dec 4, 2015 5:18 pm
Continued from here:
Sports is our Business
https://forums.realgm.com/boards/
https://forums.realgm.com/boards/viewtopic.php?f=35&t=1416607
Zonkerbl wrote:My problem with this proposal is it only addresses a small part of the problems guns present. It won't stop people without a criminal record or history of mental illness from legally purchasing guns and then going on a murder spree. It won't stop people from sticking their legally purchased handgun in their mouth and pulling the trigger.
Zonkerbl wrote:The way I would negotiate a gun ban is to start out saying all guns should be banned. If you can convince me that there is a safe way to make exceptions that don't create huge loopholes nullifying the whole purpose of the ban then I would consider them.
There is absolutely no reason to be negotiating from a position of weakness on banning guns. It is obvious that being awash in guns is a huge problem for this country and we have to do something to drastically reduce their prevalence. A gun ban will happen the moment our politicians have the balls to propose it.
Trippinskarlo wrote:Noticed you guys have a political discussion thread over here. I don't generally post on other peoples boards, but I might over here every so often if it doesn't bother anybody.
Noticed gun control is a hot topic. My question would be; what is realistic gun control policy that could pass and also help to lower homicide by firearm rate?
I don't see an all out firearm ban happening in our lifetime. Rifles account for a very small percentage of homicides and are one of the most popular firearms for hunting and self defense. Background checks are theoretically a good thing, but not realistic for all private sales, gifts, inheritance etc. Handguns are the biggest culprit but are the most popular for self defense.
Is there a answer? Violent crime rates are already dropping, should we mess with a system that is trending towards a safer society?
Zonkerbl wrote:I oppose stricter gun control laws. I think they're a red herring, not worth expending political capital over. The only thing that will really solve the problem is an outright ban.
No one knows what the national opinion on an outright ban would be because we're all terrified of asking the question. The terrorists have won.
nate33 wrote:Zonkerbl wrote:I oppose stricter gun control laws. I think they're a red herring, not worth expending political capital over. The only thing that will really solve the problem is an outright ban.
No one knows what the national opinion on an outright ban would be because we're all terrified of asking the question. The terrorists have won.
Oh, I think we know full well what the national opinion on an outright ban would be. It would be supported by well less than 50%. Probably less than 30%.
Zonkerbl wrote:nate33 wrote:Zonkerbl wrote:I oppose stricter gun control laws. I think they're a red herring, not worth expending political capital over. The only thing that will really solve the problem is an outright ban.
No one knows what the national opinion on an outright ban would be because we're all terrified of asking the question. The terrorists have won.
Oh, I think we know full well what the national opinion on an outright ban would be. It would be supported by well less than 50%. Probably less than 30%.
That's BS. Nobody knows the answer to that question. We are not nearly as stupid as you think we are Nate.
Trippinskarlo wrote:Noticed you guys have a political discussion thread over here. I don't generally post on other peoples boards, but I might over here every so often if it doesn't bother anybody.
Noticed gun control is a hot topic. My question would be; what is realistic gun control policy that could pass and also help to lower homicide by firearm rate?
I don't see an all out firearm ban happening in our lifetime. Rifles account for a very small percentage of homicides and are one of the most popular firearms for hunting and self defense. Background checks are theoretically a good thing, but not realistic for all private sales, gifts, inheritance etc. Handguns are the biggest culprit but are the most popular for self defense.
Is there a answer? Violent crime rates are already dropping, should we mess with a system that is trending towards a safer society?
Zonkerbl wrote:The way I would negotiate a gun ban is to start out saying all guns should be banned. If you can convince me that there is a safe way to make exceptions that don't create huge loopholes nullifying the whole purpose of the ban then I would consider them.
There is absolutely no reason to be negotiating from a position of weakness on banning guns. It is obvious that being awash in guns is a huge problem for this country and we have to do something to drastically reduce their prevalence. A gun ban will happen the moment our politicians have the balls to propose it.
dckingsfan wrote:Interesting list Popper. Get rid of guns, cars, bikes & drugs and we would all be better off. hmmm, wait…
popper wrote:
Trippin - I believe I read somewhere that most felons involved in gun related violence grew up in single parent households. Perhaps the most important thing we could do to reduce gun violence is for our leaders and press to repeat over and over and over....... Don't have babies out of wedlock
montestewart wrote:dckingsfan wrote:Interesting list Popper. Get rid of guns, cars, bikes & drugs and we would all be better off. hmmm, wait…
There's still the risk of dying of embarrassment when you show up to a function in the same attire as millie is wearing.