Jamaaliver wrote:Now Is the Time for Bradley Beal to Ask Out of WashingtonThe Wizards guard is taking a wait-and-see approach to his future in D.C. But becoming the next star to force his way out of town is what’s best for Beal and the franchiseBeal recently went on record saying that he wants to evaluate whomever replaces Ernie Grunfeld, the deposed team president who somehow survived 16 seasons while never putting together a team that won more than 50 games. And that he also wants to see what will happen with Washington in free agency, despite the Wizards’ not having the cap space to sign any players who will dramatically alter their immediate outlook.
Beal, whose current deal ends after the 2020-21 season, has expressed interest in the three-year, $111 million extension offer from Washington that everyone seems to think is coming.
[T]he most distressing thing about the Wizards: They’ve been trying to compete this whole time.If Beal agrees to an extension and the Wizards are unable to pawn off Wall on another team, there will be a reckoning ahead' it’s hard to see how things will get better.
If Beal wants out, now is the time to say it. Washington can maximize his return with time left on his contract, and all the movement around the league will quickly wash away any potential PR hit. The Wizards need a merciful release from the treadmill of mediocrity, and Beal’s staying put would keep the franchise firmly on it. For the best interest of both parties, it’s time for a change in Washington.
The Ringer
These arguments have been hashed over and over again for months. There are several issues about a Beal trade that this article and other similar articles consistently overlook:
1. Tanking doesn't really work, particularly with the new lottery odds. Three of the top 4 picks went to the 7th, 8th and 11th worst teams. It doesn't help the rebuilding process all that much to dump Beal and go from a 35-win team to a 22-win team.
2. The cap difficulties are overstated. Yes, the Wizards are going to suck this year with Wall, Mahinmi and Howard on the books, but next year, Mahinmi and Howard come off and Wall returns to being at least a starting-caliber player, if not still a star (meaning we won't have to pay additional money for another PG). The Wizards will have a fair amount of cap flexibility that summer to add a good free agent or buy a pick. The year after that, Beal will get a big extension, but by then, there will only be 2 years left on Wall's contract. The team could pay the luxtax for two years in a row and not have to pay a repeater tax. Or they could move Wall. Wall, playing at 90% of his former self, with only 2 years left on his deal, is definitely movable.
3. Beal is 25. He has 6 or 7 prime years in front of him. It's not like he's already 30.
4. Finally, and most importantly, teams rarely get fair value when trading an All-NBA caliber player. If the Wizards could get the kind of package New Orleans got for Davis, then, sure, trading Beal would make sense. But such a package is unlikely to be forthcoming because teams looking to add Bradley Beal are in win-now mode, which means they are likely to lack high picks and young assets worth Beal. Bradley Beal, with 6 or 7 prime years ahead of him, is likely to be way more valuable than whatever the Wizards could get back in a Beal trade.
5. It all comes down to Bradley Beal and his decision in 2021. If he will resign, then I seriously doubt any trade package will help the team in the long run more so than keeping Beal helps the team. I would refrain from trading him unless we got a godfather package. If Beal is likely to depart, then obviously, trading him for something is better than letting him walk.