Ruzious wrote:Wizardspride wrote:
That logo looks way cool, but the name seems contrived. What do red wolves have to do with DC?
Nothing to do with DC per se, but they did roam in this area at one point.
Moderators: LyricalRico, nate33, montestewart
Ruzious wrote:Wizardspride wrote:
That logo looks way cool, but the name seems contrived. What do red wolves have to do with DC?
Ruzious wrote:Wizardspride wrote:
That logo looks way cool, but the name seems contrived. What do red wolves have to do with DC?
long suffrin' boulez fan wrote:I could live with it and would love to see this logo and an alternate burgundy curly W
doclinkin wrote:Who cares if it has a Washington tie in. Is New York filled with Giants? Bears in Chicago? Rams, Raiders, whatever wherever. Frankly the area specific mascots often seem gimmicky to me, trying too hard. If we were the Washington Justice I'd be okay with it, but mostly from an ironic standpoint. I'm fine with Redwolves, though think the "R" logo is dumb looking. Just use the W and it stands for Washington and 'Wolves, and Winning, (one hopes). Worked for the Nats, right?
Ruzious wrote:I wouldn't mind RedHawks.
Ruzious wrote:I'm hearing Generals and Presidents are being considered. Stunningly awful!
Wizardspride wrote:READ BETWEEN THE LINES
?s=19
?s=19
?s=19
long suffrin' boulez fan wrote:Wizardspride wrote:READ BETWEEN THE LINES
?s=19
?s=19
?s=19
Gotta admit. I don’t understand what your post or Hernandez’s tweets mean.
Can you explain?