80sballboy wrote:NatP4 wrote:Would NOP throw in their 1st round pick with Holiday for Wall?
Holiday is significantly better than Wall, but do they know that?
He's pretty obviously trolling on anything Wall-related.. it's been his MO for years now
Moderators: LyricalRico, nate33, montestewart
80sballboy wrote:NatP4 wrote:Would NOP throw in their 1st round pick with Holiday for Wall?
Holiday is significantly better than Wall, but do they know that?
NatP4 wrote:80sballboy wrote:NatP4 wrote:Would NOP throw in their 1st round pick with Holiday for Wall?
Holiday is significantly better than Wall, but do they know that?
Well, this season I should add, with this trade taking place in the upcoming offseason. Not too different from the clippers trading Griffin after he had a horrible year at the same age
80sballboy wrote:NatP4 wrote:80sballboy wrote:
Well, this season I should add, with this trade taking place in the upcoming offseason. Not too different from the clippers trading Griffin after he had a horrible year at the same age
He's not much better this season. He's shooting 32% from beyond the arc and is averaging around 5 assists per game playing with two All-Star post players. He's a good player. John is very good to great depending on health. No metric is going to make me believe that Holiday is much better this year or ever.
Now I never said I was opposed to trading John. That contract is going to crush us and it's only worth it if it leads to a trip to the Finals. I think everything depends on the playoffs. He doesn't have to change his game and become Sato but he does need to make that extra pass more instead of chucking up mid-range bricks early in the shot clock.
Illmatic12 wrote:80sballboy wrote:NatP4 wrote:Would NOP throw in their 1st round pick with Holiday for Wall?
Holiday is significantly better than Wall, but do they know that?
He's pretty obviously trolling on anything Wall-related.. it's been his MO for years now
Illmatic12 wrote:Dark Faze wrote:Wall is not being moved lol. Not with this GM and owner, who have shown repeatedly that they'll let follow their core people off a mountain before considering altering it.
I can't see an Otto move that could be made that would would work as a salary dump while also being able to even mildly justify it to the fanbase. Basically, you'd need to move him to a team that somehow had a top pick and expirings. Most teams don't value Otto for a top pick, or would be deep enough in a tank already to where it wouldn't make sense. The best chance at an Otto move might have been with Cleveland--something like Otto and the Net pick for expirings.
If an Ian move is to be made, it makes a lot more sense for it to be made this summer than next. If the move is made next year, then it's a real waste because you're only getting out of his contract a year early. Yes, there's considerable savings from the tax, but one years tax savings is not worth a first imo--because said player could represent a cheap quality player locked up, something the team will desperately need moving forward. I could see them still moving the pick if they could get a "good" contract back, something like the deals Jae Crowder and Morris were on--locked up long term on the cheap. But completely abandoning Ian and the 19 pick for years tax savings via an expiring is just very unlikely imo. It's just bad business no matter the size of the tax hit.
If I had to guess, Porter will be traded within ~12 months. I see people discussing trading Wall but that is pretty obviously not going to be something the Wizards consider. Trading Porter, for various reasons, is most likely they course of action the organization will take. It was pretty obvious the moment he signed that max contract that he wouldn't be finishing the deal out in DC.. in terms of the optics, it's just too much money for the "third/sometimes fourth"-wheel kinda player that he is currently. Otto is a very good role player, but his salary is hard to justify if he never elevates his role on the team.
There are plenty of deals to be made, a lot of teams could out there could desperately use Porter's length + shooting and don't have better uses for that salary. Essentially you'd be looking for expiring contracts + young player/pick. Look at Denver for instance, I see a lot of potential trades there. For instance
Porter + 2nd for Chandler + Faried + J Hernangomez + DEN protected 1st.
Chandler and Faried deals expire and lower Washington's tax bill after 2019. The Wiz also get the Den 1st rounder to add another cheap replacement wing prospect in the draft, and Hernangomez who is young and somewhat intriguing. For Denver, they have no starting-caliber SF and Otto would fit like a glove next to Jokic longterm. This locks them into a Murray/Harris/Porter/Lyles/Jokic core which is pretty killer and almost has GSW-esque upside offensively.
Basically for any team that needs desperately needs wing shooting and has expirings + a young prospect/future picks, you could probably try to work a Porter trade.
NatP4 wrote:Illmatic12 wrote:80sballboy wrote:
He's pretty obviously trolling on anything Wall-related.. it's been his MO for years now
You gotta stop this Illmatic, you wanted the wizards to trade Oubre and Porter for Rudy Gay based on a summer league wall interview where you thought he was calling for a “real” small forward. Like you actually wanted to see that happen. Imagine if they actually did that. We would have absolutely no future right now. Stop calling people trolls for not being Wall fanboys, it’s nonsense
Jrue Holiday is better than Wall this season easily. Holiday is one of the best defenders at the point guard position and has a TS about 6% higher. Where is the debate even? Wall has a couple more assists per game?? Holiday also averages a turnover less per game.
Illmatic12 wrote:NatP4 wrote:Illmatic12 wrote: He's pretty obviously trolling on anything Wall-related.. it's been his MO for years now
You gotta stop this Illmatic, you wanted the wizards to trade Oubre and Porter for Rudy Gay based on a summer league wall interview where you thought he was calling for a “real” small forward. Like you actually wanted to see that happen. Imagine if they actually did that. We would have absolutely no future right now. Stop calling people trolls for not being Wall fanboys, it’s nonsense
Jrue Holiday is better than Wall this season easily. Holiday is one of the best defenders at the point guard position and has a TS about 6% higher. Where is the debate even? Wall has a couple more assists per game?? Holiday also averages a turnover less per game.
I don't remember saying that. In fact I've been one of the highest on Oubre since the Wizards drafted him, I can't ever remember proposing to trade KO, except when the Paul George discussions came up.. and I can assure that whatever I've posted wasn't just me trolling to get a reaction.
You've become recognized by most posters for consistently posting anti-Wall content, outlandishly negative stuff about JW obviously trying to get a reaction.. on the internet there's a word for people who do that
NatP4 wrote:Illmatic12 wrote:Dark Faze wrote:Wall is not being moved lol. Not with this GM and owner, who have shown repeatedly that they'll let follow their core people off a mountain before considering altering it.
I can't see an Otto move that could be made that would would work as a salary dump while also being able to even mildly justify it to the fanbase. Basically, you'd need to move him to a team that somehow had a top pick and expirings. Most teams don't value Otto for a top pick, or would be deep enough in a tank already to where it wouldn't make sense. The best chance at an Otto move might have been with Cleveland--something like Otto and the Net pick for expirings.
If an Ian move is to be made, it makes a lot more sense for it to be made this summer than next. If the move is made next year, then it's a real waste because you're only getting out of his contract a year early. Yes, there's considerable savings from the tax, but one years tax savings is not worth a first imo--because said player could represent a cheap quality player locked up, something the team will desperately need moving forward. I could see them still moving the pick if they could get a "good" contract back, something like the deals Jae Crowder and Morris were on--locked up long term on the cheap. But completely abandoning Ian and the 19 pick for years tax savings via an expiring is just very unlikely imo. It's just bad business no matter the size of the tax hit.
If I had to guess, Porter will be traded within ~12 months. I see people discussing trading Wall but that is pretty obviously not going to be something the Wizards consider. Trading Porter, for various reasons, is most likely they course of action the organization will take. It was pretty obvious the moment he signed that max contract that he wouldn't be finishing the deal out in DC.. in terms of the optics, it's just too much money for the "third/sometimes fourth"-wheel kinda player that he is currently. Otto is a very good role player, but his salary is hard to justify if he never elevates his role on the team.
There are plenty of deals to be made, a lot of teams could out there could desperately use Porter's length + shooting and don't have better uses for that salary. Essentially you'd be looking for expiring contracts + young player/pick. Look at Denver for instance, I see a lot of potential trades there. For instance
Porter + 2nd for Chandler + Faried + J Hernangomez + DEN protected 1st.
Chandler and Faried deals expire and lower Washington's tax bill after 2019. The Wiz also get the Den 1st rounder to add another cheap replacement wing prospect in the draft, and Hernangomez who is young and somewhat intriguing. For Denver, they have no starting-caliber SF and Otto would fit like a glove next to Jokic longterm. This locks them into a Murray/Harris/Porter/Lyles/Jokic core which is pretty killer and almost has GSW-esque upside offensively.
Basically for any team that needs desperately needs wing shooting and has expirings + a young prospect/future picks, you could probably try to work a Porter trade.
Why though? That doesn’t make us better now or in the future? How is paying your best player a max contract the problem as opposed to paying a non superstar a Supermax?
In that deal we are trading away Porter and a draft pick for essentially a protected 1st from Denver. Why in the hell would we ever do that?
Illmatic12 wrote:NatP4 wrote:Illmatic12 wrote:If I had to guess, Porter will be traded within ~12 months. I see people discussing trading Wall but that is pretty obviously not going to be something the Wizards consider. Trading Porter, for various reasons, is most likely they course of action the organization will take. It was pretty obvious the moment he signed that max contract that he wouldn't be finishing the deal out in DC.. in terms of the optics, it's just too much money for the "third/sometimes fourth"-wheel kinda player that he is currently. Otto is a very good role player, but his salary is hard to justify if he never elevates his role on the team.
There are plenty of deals to be made, a lot of teams could out there could desperately use Porter's length + shooting and don't have better uses for that salary. Essentially you'd be looking for expiring contracts + young player/pick. Look at Denver for instance, I see a lot of potential trades there. For instance
Porter + 2nd for Chandler + Faried + J Hernangomez + DEN protected 1st.
Chandler and Faried deals expire and lower Washington's tax bill after 2019. The Wiz also get the Den 1st rounder to add another cheap replacement wing prospect in the draft, and Hernangomez who is young and somewhat intriguing. For Denver, they have no starting-caliber SF and Otto would fit like a glove next to Jokic longterm. This locks them into a Murray/Harris/Porter/Lyles/Jokic core which is pretty killer and almost has GSW-esque upside offensively.
Basically for any team that needs desperately needs wing shooting and has expirings + a young prospect/future picks, you could probably try to work a Porter trade.
Why though? That doesn’t make us better now or in the future? How is paying your best player a max contract the problem as opposed to paying a non superstar a Supermax?
In that deal we are trading away Porter and a draft pick for essentially a protected 1st from Denver. Why in the hell would we ever do that?
Why? Because the Wizards ownership won't want to pay the repeater tax and moving Porter's deal is going to be the easiest move they can make, with the least moving parts involved.
And look at how the best teams in the league are set up. Overpaying for high-end players (ie the type of guys who can carry you in a playoff series) is absolutely not as detrimental to a team as overpaying for role players. Look at how the best teams in the league are set up.. the Celtics have 3 max All-Stars, and everyone else making under $6 million. You simply can't avoid overpaying for stars in the NBA, the market sets their value. But you can avoid overpaying for players like Porter.
NatP4 wrote:Illmatic12 wrote:NatP4 wrote:
Why though? That doesn’t make us better now or in the future? How is paying your best player a max contract the problem as opposed to paying a non superstar a Supermax?
In that deal we are trading away Porter and a draft pick for essentially a protected 1st from Denver. Why in the hell would we ever do that?
Why? Because the Wizards ownership won't want to pay the repeater tax and moving Porter's deal is going to be the easiest move they can make, with the least moving parts involved.
And look at how the best teams in the league are set up. Overpaying for high-end players (ie the type of guys who can carry you in a playoff series) is absolutely not as detrimental to a team as overpaying for role players. Look at how the best teams in the league are set up.. the Celtics have 3 max All-Stars, and everyone else making under $6 million. You simply can't avoid overpaying for stars in the NBA, the market sets their value. But you can avoid overpaying for players like Porter.
Where does that come from though? What evidence do we have of Wall carrying us in a playoff series? How is Wall more valuable than Porter? If we were talking about Kyrie Irving or Steph Curry sure, Wall isn’t a superstar. You can’t get away with paying a 2nd tier Point guard 46 million. This team is showing you that you can plug in a similar player to Otto Porter at point guard and be successful. Who is the Otto Porter guard version out there? Gary Harris? If you plugged him in alongside Beal instead of Wall at a regular max contract price, which team would be better?
I’m not saying I have the answers, but look at what the current team is doing, are you sure you aren’t overstating Walls impact? If he was some prime time playoff performer this is a different conversation. The 15 million dollar gap between Walls deal and a regular max contract is killer. Otto Porter is an elite player
I mean really, pay Wall 40 million and trade Porter for a protected late 1st??
Illmatic12 wrote:NatP4 wrote:Illmatic12 wrote:Why? Because the Wizards ownership won't want to pay the repeater tax and moving Porter's deal is going to be the easiest move they can make, with the least moving parts involved.
And look at how the best teams in the league are set up. Overpaying for high-end players (ie the type of guys who can carry you in a playoff series) is absolutely not as detrimental to a team as overpaying for role players. Look at how the best teams in the league are set up.. the Celtics have 3 max All-Stars, and everyone else making under $6 million. You simply can't avoid overpaying for stars in the NBA, the market sets their value. But you can avoid overpaying for players like Porter.
Where does that come from though? What evidence do we have of Wall carrying us in a playoff series? How is Wall more valuable than Porter? If we were talking about Kyrie Irving or Steph Curry sure, Wall isn’t a superstar. You can’t get away with paying a 2nd tier Point guard 46 million. This team is showing you that you can plug in a similar player to Otto Porter at point guard and be successful. Who is the Otto Porter guard version out there? Gary Harris? If you plugged him in alongside Beal instead of Wall at a regular max contract price, which team would be better?
I’m not saying I have the answers, but look at what the current team is doing, are you sure you aren’t overstating Walls impact? If he was some prime time playoff performer this is a different conversation. The 15 million dollar gap between Walls deal and a regular max contract is killer. Otto Porter is an elite player
I mean really, pay Wall 40 million and trade Porter for a protected late 1st??
"What evidence do we have of Wall carrying us in a playoff series?" .. this is what I'm talking about lol, you expect people to assume you're serious and not trolling?
"This team is showing you that you can plug in a similar player to Otto Porter at point guard and be successful."
So which East team are the Wizards beating in a playoff series starting Satoransky at point guard? Maybe let's not get too excited over a couple regular seasons games..
Wall averaged 27/10/4/stls/1blk last postseason and was one of the top performers in the 2017 playoffs. Otto Porter is a good player but he is NOT elite. He's never going to be the best player on the floor in a series. He averaged 10ppg vs Atlanta and was outplayed by Taurean Prince a rookie. In the NBA you ideally want to pay max money only to players with proven star talent ie Wall, Beal.. not players like Porter.
Look Otto doesn't have the worst contract in the league or anything, but with the salary constraints Wash is going to face he will be the most expendable of our high salary players. I wish we could keep the Wall/Beal/Porter/Oubre core and still add more around them, but unfortunately the salary cap is a thing, and Grunfeld has handicapped us into the situation we're in now.
Ruzious wrote:Oubre and our 1st rounder to either Memphis, Chicago, Phoenix, Cleveland (Brooklyn), Sacramento, Atlanta, Dallas for their 1st pick - trying to get in top 7 or 8.
Some random troll wrote:Not to sound negative, but this team is owned by an arrogant cheapskate, managed by a moron and coached by an idiot. Recipe for disaster.
NatP4 wrote:Illmatic12 wrote:NatP4 wrote:
Where does that come from though? What evidence do we have of Wall carrying us in a playoff series? How is Wall more valuable than Porter? If we were talking about Kyrie Irving or Steph Curry sure, Wall isn’t a superstar. You can’t get away with paying a 2nd tier Point guard 46 million. This team is showing you that you can plug in a similar player to Otto Porter at point guard and be successful. Who is the Otto Porter guard version out there? Gary Harris? If you plugged him in alongside Beal instead of Wall at a regular max contract price, which team would be better?
I’m not saying I have the answers, but look at what the current team is doing, are you sure you aren’t overstating Walls impact? If he was some prime time playoff performer this is a different conversation. The 15 million dollar gap between Walls deal and a regular max contract is killer. Otto Porter is an elite player
I mean really, pay Wall 40 million and trade Porter for a protected late 1st??
"What evidence do we have of Wall carrying us in a playoff series?" .. this is what I'm talking about lol, you expect people to assume you're serious and not trolling?
"This team is showing you that you can plug in a similar player to Otto Porter at point guard and be successful."
So which East team are the Wizards beating in a playoff series starting Satoransky at point guard? Maybe let's not get too excited over a couple regular seasons games..
Wall averaged 27/10/4/stls/1blk last postseason and was one of the top performers in the 2017 playoffs. Otto Porter is a good player but he is NOT elite. He's never going to be the best player on the floor in a series. He averaged 10ppg vs Atlanta and was outplayed by Taurean Prince a rookie. In the NBA you ideally want to pay max money only to players with proven star talent ie Wall, Beal.. not players like Porter.
Look Otto doesn't have the worst contract in the league or anything, but with the salary constraints Wash is going to face he will be the most expendable of our high salary players. I wish we could keep the Wall/Beal/Porter/Oubre core and still add more around them, but unfortunately the salary cap is a thing, and Grunfeld has handicapped us into the situation we're in now.
I see where you’re coming from, but again, I think you are massively understating Otto’s impact and overstating Walls. Why didn’t you post Walls stats from the Boston series where the worst defender in the nba “shut him down” I guess by simply letting wall beat himself. A first round series against Atlanta matches up against Dennis Schroeder? That’s your evidence?
Trading Otto for nothing and paying Oubre would put us right back in the same spot minus an elite player. Atleast there is some evidence in my claim about the team without Wall. 6-2 with record level assists as a team, there’s something there. I’m not saying Sato>Wall at all, I’m saying moving Wall for draft picks(which can be used to draft another PG like Doncic) and saving 200 million(which can be used to sign a Wall replacement) is better than trading Otto for a protected 1st
I’m all for waiting and seeing what the core of Wall Beal Oubre Porter and Sato can do this postseason though. If we see the same Wall we’ve seen all this year and post trade deadline last year+a 2nd round exit, then what?
Illmatic12 wrote:NatP4 wrote:Illmatic12 wrote:"What evidence do we have of Wall carrying us in a playoff series?" .. this is what I'm talking about lol, you expect people to assume you're serious and not trolling?
"This team is showing you that you can plug in a similar player to Otto Porter at point guard and be successful."
So which East team are the Wizards beating in a playoff series starting Satoransky at point guard? Maybe let's not get too excited over a couple regular seasons games..
Wall averaged 27/10/4/stls/1blk last postseason and was one of the top performers in the 2017 playoffs. Otto Porter is a good player but he is NOT elite. He's never going to be the best player on the floor in a series. He averaged 10ppg vs Atlanta and was outplayed by Taurean Prince a rookie. In the NBA you ideally want to pay max money only to players with proven star talent ie Wall, Beal.. not players like Porter.
Look Otto doesn't have the worst contract in the league or anything, but with the salary constraints Wash is going to face he will be the most expendable of our high salary players. I wish we could keep the Wall/Beal/Porter/Oubre core and still add more around them, but unfortunately the salary cap is a thing, and Grunfeld has handicapped us into the situation we're in now.
I see where you’re coming from, but again, I think you are massively understating Otto’s impact and overstating Walls. Why didn’t you post Walls stats from the Boston series where the worst defender in the nba “shut him down” I guess by simply letting wall beat himself. A first round series against Atlanta matches up against Dennis Schroeder? That’s your evidence?
Wall's stats in the Boston series? 25/10/3/2blks/2stls.
And the "worst defender in the NBA" ie Isaiah Thomas didn't defend Wall, you know who he was guarding in that series? Otto Porter. Just to clarify, you're arguing that Porter is elite while asking for evidence for why a 5x All-Star coming off an All-NBA season is an elite player. The fact that John had two of the league's best G defenders, Smart and Bradley rotating on him at all times.. is proof that he's eliteTrading Otto for nothing and paying Oubre would put us right back in the same spot minus an elite player. Atleast there is some evidence in my claim about the team without Wall. 6-2 with record level assists as a team, there’s something there. I’m not saying Sato>Wall at all, I’m saying moving Wall for draft picks(which can be used to draft another PG like Doncic) and saving 200 million(which can be used to sign a Wall replacement) is better than trading Otto for a protected 1st
I’m all for waiting and seeing what the core of Wall Beal Oubre Porter and Sato can do this postseason though. If we see the same Wall we’ve seen all this year and post trade deadline last year+a 2nd round exit, then what?
Who proposed trading Otto for nothing? IF it comes down to trading Porter to avoid repeater tax, I think WAS could get a reasonable return which would include $25+ million of cap relief, at least 1 cheap young prospect and a FRP.. which is not nothing. And not because I hate Otto, but bc his role on the team is simply more replaceable relative to his salary. If the Wizards can somehow manage to dump Mahinmi and land Oubre/Satoransky on bargain contracts, then hopefully we can keep everyone and it doesn't come to that.
Wall just had an All-NBA season and was elite in the playoffs, obviously this year he's struggling with injuries but we've seen what he can do. What if we see the same Otto we saw post trade deadline last year who looked like he needed a hip replacement? And the same Otto who scored zero points in a playoff game, yet now being paid more per year than Bradley Beal? Then what? I'd say he has a lot more to prove than John does.. out of our "big three" his position is the least safe.
NatP4 wrote:Those aren’t even Walls stats against Boston lol. Did you just round everything up? 2 blocks 2 steals???? What? The guy shot 39% and averaged 4 turnovers per game. He shot sub 40% in 4/7 games and was a minus 4/7 games.
I’ll give you the Atlanta series against a team we were obviously favored against, matched up against Schroder. Other than that, he shot 36% in 2014, 38% in 2015 and 39% against Boston in 2017 (on a ridiculous 23 FGA per game) 14 missed shots and 4 turnovers per game from your point guard is pretty tough to overcome, no? Especially when he couldn’t guard anyone on the other end, we were literally trying to hide him on Jae Crowder and Avery Bradley. Yeah I know “he was fatigued from carrying the team all year”
I know right, I’m such a hater for pointing out numbers. You really gonna call Wall a playoff performer based on all that? Trade Otto for Denver’s 1st round pick protected and pay Wall 46 million as a 31 year old? I’m a hater for disagreeing with that?
I’m a huge believer in the core of this team also, I’m hoping Wall plays like his pre trade deadline 2016 self and they go to the finals this year and Ernie has a good draft over anything else, but I’m not a hater for wanting to trade Wall if he doesn’t change his game. He needs to be a good defender again and more unselfish offensively