ImageImageImageImageImage

Why Have We Gotten Better?

Moderators: LyricalRico, nate33, montestewart

payitforward
RealGM
Posts: 24,555
And1: 9,076
Joined: May 02, 2012
Location: On the Atlantic

Why Have We Gotten Better? 

Post#1 » by payitforward » Wed Jan 23, 2019 4:56 pm

After winning the first 3 games in December (2 of the wins were over Atlanta & the Knicks), we proceeded to go 2-6 in our next 8.

Since then we have gone 7-4. Why? The question is particularly interesting in that game by game over the last several weeks, Jeff Green has been returning to his average level of production. I.e. getting less productive.

I imagine there'll be some who point to the departure of Kelly Oubre & the arrival of Trevor Ariza -- having Ariza on the floor taking Oubre's minutes.

But, that's not the answer. Overall, Ariza hasn't played particularly better than Oubre. Which is to say that he hasn't played well. Yes, Ariza does get more assists Oubre. But Oubre shot way way better & on significantly higher usage as well (as a Wizard, Trevor has shot 45.7% on 2's & 31% on 3's -- that's awful, obviously). And Oubre also rebounded better than Trevor & blocked way more shots.

Still, although he hasn't played well, Trevor has improved us.

How? Because he plays way way mpg than Oubre did. & those minutes would have been played by far worse players than Ariza.

At first, those minutes were coming from time that, expect that he was injured, Otto Porter would have played. Taking minutes from Otto doesn't help the Wizards. Which is why we lost 5 of the first 6 games Trevor played. In fact our only win in that run was against the worst team in the league & it took us 3 overtimes to get it!

Yet, as I say, we are 7-4 since then. What happened?

It's simple: Austin Rivers is gone, & Markieff Morris has been out. Two really bad players.

Ariza has picked up some of Kieff's minutes (in addition to replacing Oubre's PT, I mean). Dekker has taken most of the rest, & he has been terrific. & Bryant's minutes have risen as well. Another good thing. Mahinmi's playing better as well.

But, above all, Satoransky -- who got very few minutes towards the start of the season -- is eating up Rivers' minutes & is now 4th in minutes on the team behind Wall, Green & Beal. He'll pass Wall a couple of games from now. He may pass Jeff Green as well, if the downward trend I mentioned above continues.

In short, aside from Beal & Porter, virtually every single one of Ernie's considered, hand-picked choices over the last decade is either gone, not playing much if at all (Mahinmi, Brown), or else injured -- & even Otto has been injured a bunch.

The R2 picks, cast-offs, afterthoughts & whats-his-names that somehow wound up here as Ernie made moves to bury his mistakes -- those are the guys (along with Beal & Otto, now that he's back) are the reason this team has gone 7-4 in our last 11 games.

In short, even when we get better, the big thing we learn from the fact is what an incompetent, conceited jackass is our long-tenured GM!!

Consider this:

Not a single Washington Wizard playing in our next game is either a guy we picked or traded for since the 2013 draft (almost 6 years ago) -- nor even a guy we got by trading one of those guys! -- with the sole exception of Trevor Ariza, who is an expiring end-of-career rental.

What an indictment!!
NatP4
RealGM
Posts: 14,779
And1: 6,010
Joined: Jul 24, 2016
         

Re: Why Have We Gotten Better? 

Post#2 » by NatP4 » Wed Jan 23, 2019 6:34 pm

Aaron White is coming, just you wait.
Ruzious
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 47,909
And1: 11,582
Joined: Jul 17, 2001
       

Re: Why Have We Gotten Better? 

Post#3 » by Ruzious » Wed Jan 23, 2019 6:39 pm

It does bother me that Ariza is a rental and without him - we don't compete for a playoff spot. So, while he's a consumate professional doing a great job - what's the benefit - considering he won't be here next season? If all this is just to get swept in the first round of the playoffs, what have we gained? Well, they are a lot more fun to watch - winning 7 of their last 10.
"A common mistake that people make when trying to design something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools." - Douglas Adams
Illmatic12
RealGM
Posts: 10,161
And1: 8,459
Joined: Dec 20, 2013
 

Re: Why Have We Gotten Better? 

Post#4 » by Illmatic12 » Wed Jan 23, 2019 7:52 pm

In short, aside from Beal & Porter, virtually every single one of Ernie's considered, hand-picked choices over the last decade is either gone, not playing much if at all (Mahinmi, Brown), or else injured -- & even Otto has been injured a bunch.

I generally agree with you but, Grunfeld does deserve some credit for Thomas Bryant to be fair
payitforward
RealGM
Posts: 24,555
And1: 9,076
Joined: May 02, 2012
Location: On the Atlantic

Re: Why Have We Gotten Better? 

Post#5 » by payitforward » Wed Jan 23, 2019 8:26 pm

Illmatic12 wrote:
In short, aside from Beal & Porter, virtually every single one of Ernie's considered, hand-picked choices over the last decade is either gone, not playing much if at all (Mahinmi, Brown), or else injured -- & even Otto has been injured a bunch.

I generally agree with you but, Grunfeld does deserve some credit for Thomas Bryant to be fair

Here's how we got Thomas Bryant:

1.Rob Pelinka figured out that he wasn't going to be able to keep Thomas Bryant this year.
2. Pelinka knew that Bryant was a very talented prospect.
3. For that reason, Pelinka didn't want to see him in the Western Conference. In fact, he wanted him as far away as possible.
4. Pelinka called Ernie & said "I've got something for you. But, if you like it & follow up, you have to agree that you owe me one."
5. Ernie said, "OK."
6. Pelinka explained points 1-3 above to Ernie, then said: "I'm going to waive Bryant today at x pm. Be ready to pick him up immediately."
7. Ernie said, "Ok."

Note that in this sequence of events, Ernie was required to say "Ok" not just once but twice. So, you are right: Ernie gets some credit for Thomas Bryant.

In a similar way, but less demanding & more wasteful, Ernie also deserves credit for Sam Dekker. Sam went #18 in the 2015 draft. All it cost Ernie to acquire him was the 19th pick that year, 3 or 4 R2 picks, & paying for 2 FA mistakes for a while (Meeks & Smith).

Outstanding work, really -- just terrific.
Wizardspride
RealGM
Posts: 17,235
And1: 11,426
Joined: Nov 05, 2004
Location: Olney, MD/Kailua/Kaneohe, HI
       

Re: Why Have We Gotten Better? 

Post#6 » by Wizardspride » Wed Jan 23, 2019 8:55 pm

NatP4 wrote:Aaron White is coming, just you wait.



:lol:

President Donald Trump referred to African countries, Haiti and El Salvador as "shithole" nations during a meeting Thursday and asked why the U.S. can't have more immigrants from Norway.
trast66
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,319
And1: 703
Joined: Oct 20, 2017
 

Re: Why Have We Gotten Better? 

Post#7 » by trast66 » Wed Jan 23, 2019 9:20 pm

I think its regression toward the mean. In the predict the record thread I went 42 wins and 7th seed. Will probably end up short of that, but its not like they were ever going to end up with 32 or 52 wins.
User avatar
long suffrin' boulez fan
General Manager
Posts: 7,830
And1: 3,621
Joined: Nov 18, 2005
Location: Just above Ted's double bottom line
       

Re: Why Have We Gotten Better? 

Post#8 » by long suffrin' boulez fan » Wed Jan 23, 2019 9:21 pm

Perhaps this is a John Wall effect that even Kevin can believe in.
In Rizzo we trust
80sballboy
RealGM
Posts: 24,116
And1: 5,822
Joined: Jul 15, 2006
       

Re: Why Have We Gotten Better? 

Post#9 » by 80sballboy » Fri Jan 25, 2019 4:26 am

Let's face it, some of it is good fortune. Playing Milwaukee without Greek Freak, Detroit without Drummond, Knicks even without Kanter and a fortunate finish in London. But they showed me against Toronto that they can more just compete and had a nice display against the Warriors tonight. Ariza is absolutely playing lights-out. He started off poorly but dude is balling.

Sato, Bryant, Green, all solid. Otto finally healthy. Yes, Wiz are better because they are defending. Playing Sato more helps but addition of Ariza is the key.
leswizards
Pro Prospect
Posts: 934
And1: 255
Joined: Jun 09, 2010

Re: Why Have We Gotten Better? 

Post#10 » by leswizards » Fri Jan 25, 2019 1:42 pm

John wall has been awful this season, but is now injured. Austin rivers, markieff morris, Kelly oubre, and Jason Smith are all awful and are now gone or injured . That is a lot of unproductive minutes being replaced, and probably explains why the Wizards have gotten better.
Viva le tank! At this pace, it will never end.
User avatar
long suffrin' boulez fan
General Manager
Posts: 7,830
And1: 3,621
Joined: Nov 18, 2005
Location: Just above Ted's double bottom line
       

Re: Why Have We Gotten Better? 

Post#11 » by long suffrin' boulez fan » Fri Jan 25, 2019 4:49 pm

I believe the title of this thread has changed from PIF's original leading question "Have we gotten better?"

Next, we should change what's been attributed to PIF to something like, "I'm so dang happy we've gotten better that I've started to change my mind about Ernie."
In Rizzo we trust
User avatar
long suffrin' boulez fan
General Manager
Posts: 7,830
And1: 3,621
Joined: Nov 18, 2005
Location: Just above Ted's double bottom line
       

Re: Why Have We Gotten Better? 

Post#12 » by long suffrin' boulez fan » Fri Jan 25, 2019 4:49 pm

^ Or maybe just "Four more years! Four more years!"
In Rizzo we trust
dckingsfan
RealGM
Posts: 34,556
And1: 20,211
Joined: May 28, 2010

Re: Why Have We Gotten Better? 

Post#13 » by dckingsfan » Fri Jan 25, 2019 6:27 pm

leswizards wrote:John wall has been awful this season, but is now injured. Austin rivers, markieff morris, Kelly oubre, and Jason Smith are all awful and are now gone or injured . That is a lot of unproductive minutes being replaced, and probably explains why the Wizards have gotten better.

I think you hit the nail on the head - unproductive minutes replaced with reasonably productive minutes.
User avatar
gtn130
Analyst
Posts: 3,512
And1: 2,740
Joined: Mar 18, 2009

Re: Why Have We Gotten Better? 

Post#14 » by gtn130 » Fri Jan 25, 2019 6:35 pm

payitforward wrote:
Illmatic12 wrote:
In short, aside from Beal & Porter, virtually every single one of Ernie's considered, hand-picked choices over the last decade is either gone, not playing much if at all (Mahinmi, Brown), or else injured -- & even Otto has been injured a bunch.

I generally agree with you but, Grunfeld does deserve some credit for Thomas Bryant to be fair

Here's how we got Thomas Bryant:

1.Rob Pelinka figured out that he wasn't going to be able to keep Thomas Bryant this year.
2. Pelinka knew that Bryant was a very talented prospect.
3. For that reason, Pelinka didn't want to see him in the Western Conference. In fact, he wanted him as far away as possible.
4. Pelinka called Ernie & said "I've got something for you. But, if you like it & follow up, you have to agree that you owe me one."
5. Ernie said, "OK."
6. Pelinka explained points 1-3 above to Ernie, then said: "I'm going to waive Bryant today at x pm. Be ready to pick him up immediately."
7. Ernie said, "Ok."

Note that in this sequence of events, Ernie was required to say "Ok" not just once but twice. So, you are right: Ernie gets some credit for Thomas Bryant.

In a similar way, but less demanding & more wasteful, Ernie also deserves credit for Sam Dekker. Sam went #18 in the 2015 draft. All it cost Ernie to acquire him was the 19th pick that year, 3 or 4 R2 picks, & paying for 2 FA mistakes for a while (Meeks & Smith).

Outstanding work, really -- just terrific.


I see no reason to get excited about Bryant since we can't actually resign him.
NatP4
RealGM
Posts: 14,779
And1: 6,010
Joined: Jul 24, 2016
         

Re: Why Have We Gotten Better? 

Post#15 » by NatP4 » Fri Jan 25, 2019 7:49 pm

gtn130 wrote:
payitforward wrote:
Illmatic12 wrote:I generally agree with you but, Grunfeld does deserve some credit for Thomas Bryant to be fair

Here's how we got Thomas Bryant:

1.Rob Pelinka figured out that he wasn't going to be able to keep Thomas Bryant this year.
2. Pelinka knew that Bryant was a very talented prospect.
3. For that reason, Pelinka didn't want to see him in the Western Conference. In fact, he wanted him as far away as possible.
4. Pelinka called Ernie & said "I've got something for you. But, if you like it & follow up, you have to agree that you owe me one."
5. Ernie said, "OK."
6. Pelinka explained points 1-3 above to Ernie, then said: "I'm going to waive Bryant today at x pm. Be ready to pick him up immediately."
7. Ernie said, "Ok."

Note that in this sequence of events, Ernie was required to say "Ok" not just once but twice. So, you are right: Ernie gets some credit for Thomas Bryant.

In a similar way, but less demanding & more wasteful, Ernie also deserves credit for Sam Dekker. Sam went #18 in the 2015 draft. All it cost Ernie to acquire him was the 19th pick that year, 3 or 4 R2 picks, & paying for 2 FA mistakes for a while (Meeks & Smith).

Outstanding work, really -- just terrific.


I see no reason to get excited about Bryant since we can't actually resign him.


We can re sign him though. With the cap increase, it shouldn’t be a problem. Assuming they continue to suppress his value
Ruzious
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 47,909
And1: 11,582
Joined: Jul 17, 2001
       

Re: Why Have We Gotten Better? 

Post#16 » by Ruzious » Fri Jan 25, 2019 9:23 pm

NatP4 wrote:
gtn130 wrote:
payitforward wrote:Here's how we got Thomas Bryant:

1.Rob Pelinka figured out that he wasn't going to be able to keep Thomas Bryant this year.
2. Pelinka knew that Bryant was a very talented prospect.
3. For that reason, Pelinka didn't want to see him in the Western Conference. In fact, he wanted him as far away as possible.
4. Pelinka called Ernie & said "I've got something for you. But, if you like it & follow up, you have to agree that you owe me one."
5. Ernie said, "OK."
6. Pelinka explained points 1-3 above to Ernie, then said: "I'm going to waive Bryant today at x pm. Be ready to pick him up immediately."
7. Ernie said, "Ok."

Note that in this sequence of events, Ernie was required to say "Ok" not just once but twice. So, you are right: Ernie gets some credit for Thomas Bryant.

In a similar way, but less demanding & more wasteful, Ernie also deserves credit for Sam Dekker. Sam went #18 in the 2015 draft. All it cost Ernie to acquire him was the 19th pick that year, 3 or 4 R2 picks, & paying for 2 FA mistakes for a while (Meeks & Smith).

Outstanding work, really -- just terrific.


I see no reason to get excited about Bryant since we can't actually resign him.


We can re sign him though. With the cap increase, it shouldn’t be a problem. Assuming they continue to suppress his value

They pretty much have to re-up both Bryant and Sato, and they are both RFA's to be, so the Wiz can and will match if someone else signs them.

Probably. :)
"A common mistake that people make when trying to design something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools." - Douglas Adams
dckingsfan
RealGM
Posts: 34,556
And1: 20,211
Joined: May 28, 2010

Re: Why Have We Gotten Better? 

Post#17 » by dckingsfan » Fri Jan 25, 2019 11:39 pm

Ruzious wrote:
NatP4 wrote:
gtn130 wrote:
I see no reason to get excited about Bryant since we can't actually resign him.


We can re sign him though. With the cap increase, it shouldn’t be a problem. Assuming they continue to suppress his value

They pretty much have to re-up both Bryant and Sato, and they are both RFA's to be, so the Wiz can and will match if someone else signs them.

Probably. :)

Two hypothetical yes/no questions:
1) If you had to trade Porter to keep Satoransky, Dekker, Bryant and Randle, do you do it?

2) If you had to trade Porter to keep Satoransky, Dekker, Bryant and Randle + another young talent and a pair of 2nd round picks, do you do it?
NatP4
RealGM
Posts: 14,779
And1: 6,010
Joined: Jul 24, 2016
         

Re: Why Have We Gotten Better? 

Post#18 » by NatP4 » Sat Jan 26, 2019 12:06 am

Why would we ever face either of those scenarios? Keep Otto, Sato, and Bryant and trade the real problem, John walls contract. There’s no need to re sign Dekker even, play Troy Brown Jr. build around that Sato-Beal-Otto-Brown Jr-Bryant core and keep making draft picks.
payitforward
RealGM
Posts: 24,555
And1: 9,076
Joined: May 02, 2012
Location: On the Atlantic

Re: Why Have We Gotten Better? 

Post#19 » by payitforward » Sat Jan 26, 2019 12:08 am

Not this:
80sballboy wrote:...the addition of Ariza is the key.


This:
leswizards wrote:John wall ...Austin rivers, markieff morris, Kelly oubre, and Jason Smith are all ...gone or injured . That is a lot of unproductive minutes being replaced, and probably explains why the Wizards have gotten better.


(Although Wall was fairly productive the first 6-7 weeks of the season, then he slid in a hurry -- b/c of injury presumably. & it's true that Ariza played well vs. the Warriors -- a loss, however.)
Dat2U
RealGM
Posts: 24,143
And1: 7,905
Joined: Jun 23, 2001
Location: Columbus, OH
       

Re: Why Have We Gotten Better? 

Post#20 » by Dat2U » Sat Jan 26, 2019 12:22 am

dckingsfan wrote:
Ruzious wrote:
NatP4 wrote:
We can re sign him though. With the cap increase, it shouldn’t be a problem. Assuming they continue to suppress his value

They pretty much have to re-up both Bryant and Sato, and they are both RFA's to be, so the Wiz can and will match if someone else signs them.

Probably. :)

Two hypothetical yes/no questions:
1) If you had to trade Porter to keep Satoransky, Dekker, Bryant and Randle, do you do it?

2) If you had to trade Porter to keep Satoransky, Dekker, Bryant and Randle + another young talent and a pair of 2nd round picks, do you do it?


I don't think were at the point where we should be making financial decisions based on keeping Dekker & Randle. Lots of guys overseas and in the NBDL can put up decent stretches of play.

Bryant shouldn't be expensive. There's a glut of guys capable of playing C now around the league as teams go smaller and smaller. The restricted status helps as well. I don't see many places that would pay him big money to be a starting C. The bigger issue will be Ernie. Lets hope he doesn't kioverpay in a crowded market for bigs.

If the Wizards are smart, they'd get Sato wrapped up now. He's someone that would have value if he hit the market IMO.

I think were fine for now without moving Porter.

Return to Washington Wizards