ImageImageImageImageImage

Official Trade Thread -- Part XXXVIII

Moderators: nate33, montestewart, LyricalRico

100proof
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,604
And1: 854
Joined: Jul 25, 2019
 

Re: Official Trade Thread -- Part XXXVIII 

Post#1981 » by 100proof » Wed Sep 16, 2020 9:08 pm

pcbothwel wrote:
100proof wrote:
pcbothwel wrote:
No on value. No on fit. And not financially possible.... soooo


Technically it is financially possible.

Fit, to me seems good. A team friendly player who cam defend, shoot and handle the ball would be a good add for your team.

And on value, well thats why I asked and didnt presume.


Explain how an over the cap team can just add 20M in payroll?



You are not over the cap in the offseason.
payitforward
RealGM
Posts: 14,121
And1: 4,355
Joined: May 02, 2012
Location: On the Atlantic

Re: Official Trade Thread -- Part XXXVIII 

Post#1982 » by payitforward » Wed Sep 16, 2020 9:41 pm

100proof wrote:
TGW wrote:
100proof wrote:What would the cost be for a team to get Thomas Bryant from the Wiz?

What is it your team would be looking to improve at? Not necessarily a celtic, but just in regards to overall talent upgrade for your roster?

...It's hard to say what we'd want in return without knowing what the offer is. What did you have in mind?


Not sure. Celtics have pieces that could add up, give a little youth to you as well.

Kanter, and either Edward, Poirier and #26
or
Kanter and Romeo Langford and a second work salary wise.

Don't you have a rusty old car you could add to that? :)

Kanter is of no interest, Poirer is of no interest, Edwards is of no interest. Langford? Your R2 pick is #47.

Tell me, would you trade Bryant for this platter of nullitude?
Remember -- if you don't like the post above: blame Doc not me.
payitforward
RealGM
Posts: 14,121
And1: 4,355
Joined: May 02, 2012
Location: On the Atlantic

Re: Official Trade Thread -- Part XXXVIII 

Post#1983 » by payitforward » Wed Sep 16, 2020 9:44 pm

100proof wrote:Or maybe a larger deal of :

Hayward and #26/edwards, poirier, kanter
for
Bryant, Brown Jr and #9

Good heavens man! Now you want the #9 & Brown too if we take Hayward off your hands?

Please suggest some significant assets in return for Bryant, who is a significant asset.
Remember -- if you don't like the post above: blame Doc not me.
dckingsfan
RealGM
Posts: 19,679
And1: 7,092
Joined: May 28, 2010

Re: Official Trade Thread -- Part XXXVIII 

Post#1984 » by dckingsfan » Wed Sep 16, 2020 9:53 pm

Feels like that is how Danny makes trade offers as well :D

And how did we get to 100 pages that fast?
pcbothwel
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,211
And1: 1,537
Joined: Jun 12, 2010
     

Re: Official Trade Thread -- Part XXXVIII 

Post#1985 » by pcbothwel » Wed Sep 16, 2020 10:10 pm

100proof wrote:
pcbothwel wrote:
100proof wrote:
Technically it is financially possible.

Fit, to me seems good. A team friendly player who cam defend, shoot and handle the ball would be a good add for your team.

And on value, well thats why I asked and didnt presume.


Explain how an over the cap team can just add 20M in payroll?



You are not over the cap in the offseason.


I am not anything in the offseason. The Wizards organization otoh, has 11 players under contract for 103M. With a cap number of about 110M, that would leave us about 7M under the cap with no draft pick, no MLE, no BAE, and no Bertans.

So yeah... the wiz are not able to make that trade, nor would they given the assets they give up and the opportunity cost.
The MLE could be gold in an offseason where with a cap crunch.
So its Hayward + 26 for:
Bryant, Brown, 9, Bertans, and two FAs (Nerlens Noel/WCS + Denzel Valentine/Pat Connaughton)

Easy pass
100proof
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,604
And1: 854
Joined: Jul 25, 2019
 

Re: Official Trade Thread -- Part XXXVIII 

Post#1986 » by 100proof » Wed Sep 16, 2020 10:39 pm

pcbothwel wrote:
100proof wrote:
pcbothwel wrote:
Explain how an over the cap team can just add 20M in payroll?



You are not over the cap in the offseason.


I am not anything in the offseason. The Wizards organization otoh, has 11 players under contract for 103M. With a cap number of about 110M, that would leave us about 7M under the cap with no draft pick, no MLE, no BAE, and no Bertans.

So yeah... the wiz are not able to make that trade, nor would they given the assets they give up and the opportunity cost.
The MLE could be gold in an offseason where with a cap crunch.
So its Hayward + 26 for:
Bryant, Brown, 9, Bertans, and two FAs (Nerlens Noel/WCS + Denzel Valentine/Pat Connaughton)

Easy pass


100 mill salary.
115 mill cap.
You wont get mle unles you are already over 115.
dckingsfan
RealGM
Posts: 19,679
And1: 7,092
Joined: May 28, 2010

Re: Official Trade Thread -- Part XXXVIII 

Post#1987 » by dckingsfan » Wed Sep 16, 2020 11:11 pm

100proof wrote:
pcbothwel wrote:
100proof wrote:You are not over the cap in the offseason.

I am not anything in the offseason. The Wizards organization otoh, has 11 players under contract for 103M. With a cap number of about 110M, that would leave us about 7M under the cap with no draft pick, no MLE, no BAE, and no Bertans.

So yeah... the wiz are not able to make that trade, nor would they given the assets they give up and the opportunity cost.
The MLE could be gold in an offseason where with a cap crunch.
So its Hayward + 26 for:
Bryant, Brown, 9, Bertans, and two FAs (Nerlens Noel/WCS + Denzel Valentine/Pat Connaughton)

Easy pass

100 mill salary.
115 mill cap.
You wont get mle unles you are already over 115.

So you agree it is a horrible trade but we could do it... so, is that an easy pass or a hard pass?
montestewart
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 13,503
And1: 6,143
Joined: Feb 25, 2009

Re: Official Trade Thread -- Part XXXVIII 

Post#1988 » by montestewart » Thu Sep 17, 2020 5:22 am

Continued here

Return to Washington Wizards