NatP4 wrote:That’s not really the question though. The questions are more like: does he have good hands? Is he physical? Does he have a motor? Does he have good understanding of defensive schemes/concepts? Does he have a good understanding of offensive spacing and good shots vs bad shots? Does he have good vision/natural playmaking ability? Does he have the “it” factor or competitiveness? Does he play unselfishly for the win or for personal success?
You can read as many articles or watch YouTube highlight videos, but that doesn’t compare to watching actual full games. The Warriors play basically every single game on National TV. Wiseman has serious shortcomings. He is borderline unplayable. There is a reason that non casual Warrior fans are already debating bust/no bust.
Yes he’s 19, he didn’t play college basketball because he was suspended. How many players develop feel for the game in college basketball? How many unplayable rookies with massively negative on/off numbers, go on to be “stars”
Marvin Bagley, Mo Bamba, Jaxson Hayes, Marquess Chris all had the physical tools. None of them are NBA players.
It's been 12 games.
Just to show you there is hope:
Jermaine O'Neal barely got off the bench for his first 4 seasons in Portland and he ended up becoming a perennial All-star in the NBA.
Tony Parker had plenty of doubters, including Popovich, and San Antonio came really close to replacing him at different points.
Dirk Nowitzki had a supremely disappointing rookie year and everyone was screaming bust and tearing Don Nelson a new one.
Andrew Bynum started off real, real slow, but made the All-star team at 24 and then his knee gave out.
Sure, Wiseman could be the next Kwame Brown or Darko Milicic, but this is the risk in choosing really raw prospects.