prime1time wrote:There's something deeply wrong with an organization where a player they can draft can do everything that is expected of him. *I'm not talking about the moving goalposts that his detractors have instituted to ensure their argumentative high ground* but rather the goals that were laid out when he was first drafted and the team just up and move on from him.
Here's a fact -- On his career so far, Rui has played 5654 regular-season minutes, almost all of them at the 4.
Here's another fact -- over those 4 years Rui has averaged 18.6 points per 40 minutes -- almost exactly the average of all NBA 4s.
Here's another fact -- over those 4 years Rui has averaged a Total Scoring Percentage of .552 -- meaningfully below the average of all NBA 4s.
Here's another fact -- over those 4 years Rui has averaged 6 defensive boards per 40 minutes -- meaningfully fewer than the average of all NBA 4s.
Here's another fact -- over those 4 years Rui has averaged just under 1.5 offensive boards per 40 minutes -- meaningfully below the average of all NBA 4s.
Here's another fact -- over those 4 years Rui has averaged just under 2 assists -- meaningfully fewer than the average of all NBA 4s.
Here's another fact -- over those 4 years Rui has averaged 1.5 turnovers per 40 minutes -- meaningfully
better than the average of all NBA 4s.
Here's another fact -- over those 4 years Rui has averaged .33 blocks -- -- meaningfully fewer than the average of all NBA 4s.
Here's another fact -- over those 4 years Rui has averaged 2.5 fouls per 40 minutes -- meaningfully
better than the average of all NBA 4s.
Now, those basketball activities may not represent everything significant about a player (Rui or any other player), in which case I'd be happy to hear what other activities matter & what Rui's numbers were in those activities. But, to the degree that these number do matter -- that scoring, rebounding, assists, turnovers & fouls matter in judging an NBA player -- the only conclusion to be drawn is that Rui has been well below average overall as an NBA player at his position.
Now, neither in that conclusion nor in the numbers behind that judgement will you find any "anti-Rui" prejudice or any "hate." I have used those exact activities in looking at every player I've ever assessed. Good, bad, & indifferent. Nor did Rui's numbers show any continuity of improvement overall from year to year -- with the exception of Rui's 3 pt. % which improved somewhat his 2d year & then a whole lot his 3d year before falling significantly in his 4th year.
If we look at those same numbers for Rui's 700+ regular season minutes as a Laker, we will find that they are more or less at his career average except for rebounding which went up -- with the effect that overall his regular season numbers as a Laker were a little better than his career average numbers. Thus, in that stretch he was a better player than his career average. Not up to average overall, but better all the same.
In the playoffs, on the other hand, Rui had a very good stretch scoring the ball. I don't think his other numbers varied much from career averages, at least not overall, but his scoring did.
That's important, & it's good. & it'll definitely be something to follow as we pay attention to Rui next year.
But, that's all it is. I.e., it's not some secret metaphysical key to how good Rui is independent of his numbers compared t the numbers of any other NBA player at his position.
It wouldn't be that for any other player, & it isn't that for Rui either.