bsilver wrote:Leonsis and Sheppard know exactly what they’ve done, or at least what they believe is the future of the Wizards for the next few years. ——- being the 10th best EC team (give or take a few) with no hope for anything better ———. They're smart enough and have enough basketball knowledge (Sheppard, anyway) to not believe otherwise.
What would scare the crap out of me the very possible rapid decline of Beal. He was not very good last year. Being generous, maybe in the top 100 in the league. IMO there was not a single valid explanation. So, it’s either an unexplainable one off, or that how good he’s actually become, or worse, the start of a continuing decline. Or a leveling off for a year or two and then the expected early 30s decline.
How can you take the risk of paying 50M a year for 5 years for a mediocre player? Given, that’s the worst case, but the best case - a good Beal - brings you the great reward of 10th in the East.
Actually, given the constraints of our payroll and the odds that we'd not be drafting high for the next few years assuming Brad stays sharp/healthy, isn't the BEST outcome is that Brad declines rapidly? At least then we'd be drafting high and we'd presumably be FORCED to rebuild during the remainder of Brad's contract, which is what we all truly want.