What do we have in the tank?
Moderators: LyricalRico, nate33, montestewart
What do we have in the tank?
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 21,958
- And1: 7,874
- Joined: May 02, 2012
- Location: On the Atlantic
What do we have in the tank?
I'm not sure we are likely to gain much via a tank... am I wrong? Do you think differently? Is there usually a much better player available at, say, the 9th spot than at the 12th? What do you think?
If not... why tank?
If not... why tank?
Breaking News: In a shocking development, Wizards owner Ted Leonsis has sold the NBA franchise to a consortium of participants in a discussion board devoted to the team on realgm.com. Details to follow....
Re: What do we have in the tank?
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 21,958
- And1: 7,874
- Joined: May 02, 2012
- Location: On the Atlantic
Re: What do we have in the tank?
Btw, I think the ping pong balls will give the #1 pick to the Lakers somehow (i.e. that the league will).
Do you think so too?
Do you think so too?
Breaking News: In a shocking development, Wizards owner Ted Leonsis has sold the NBA franchise to a consortium of participants in a discussion board devoted to the team on realgm.com. Details to follow....
Re: What do we have in the tank?
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 21,958
- And1: 7,874
- Joined: May 02, 2012
- Location: On the Atlantic
Re: What do we have in the tank?
You knew this was coming... ...so don't bother.
Spoiler:
Breaking News: In a shocking development, Wizards owner Ted Leonsis has sold the NBA franchise to a consortium of participants in a discussion board devoted to the team on realgm.com. Details to follow....
Re: What do we have in the tank?
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 21,958
- And1: 7,874
- Joined: May 02, 2012
- Location: On the Atlantic
Re: What do we have in the tank?
double...
Breaking News: In a shocking development, Wizards owner Ted Leonsis has sold the NBA franchise to a consortium of participants in a discussion board devoted to the team on realgm.com. Details to follow....
Re: What do we have in the tank?
- AFM
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,880
- And1: 6,161
- Joined: May 25, 2012
Re: What do we have in the tank?
PIF containment thread. Nate please rename.
Re: What do we have in the tank?
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 21,958
- And1: 7,874
- Joined: May 02, 2012
- Location: On the Atlantic
Re: What do we have in the tank?
I'll fix it -- no worries.
Breaking News: In a shocking development, Wizards owner Ted Leonsis has sold the NBA franchise to a consortium of participants in a discussion board devoted to the team on realgm.com. Details to follow....
Re: What do we have in the tank?
- doclinkin
- RealGM
- Posts: 13,228
- And1: 5,364
- Joined: Jul 26, 2004
- Location: .wizuds.
Re: What do we have in the tank?
The tank is never about improving the position at the back end of the lottery. The tank is about shaving %'s in your favor for the top end. Yes the odds have flattened out, but the difference between the 9th pick and the 12th pick is: 17% chance of a top 4 pick, vs 9% chance of a top 4 pick.
If you had an 8% greater chance at the next LeBron, would it be worth a few more losses in a forgettable year? Is the distance between say Chet Holmgren and Tari Eason significant enough to waste a few games?
We are 3 games in the loss column behind the 7th worst record and our current 11th worst record. That is a cluster of 4 teams all neck and neck in the tankstakes. (San Antonio, New Orleans, New York, Portland). We probably won't leap them, but that is the difference between a 9% chance and a 32% chance at a top 4 pick if we could. If that cluster of teams had a cupcake schedule to finish the year, and we didn't catch hot late as we commonly do.
With few notable exceptions (selections of Giannis, Kawhi) true championship contending teams are built with top end talent. Yes you can make the argument for building a better team with more picks lower down. Trading smart, etc. But those top picks even recruit better offers from teams looking to trade up. If you want to make your stat discussion again, pull out your Pelton chart and discuss the difference between the top 4 and the 12th pick, not the 9th and 12th.
If you had an 8% greater chance at the next LeBron, would it be worth a few more losses in a forgettable year? Is the distance between say Chet Holmgren and Tari Eason significant enough to waste a few games?
We are 3 games in the loss column behind the 7th worst record and our current 11th worst record. That is a cluster of 4 teams all neck and neck in the tankstakes. (San Antonio, New Orleans, New York, Portland). We probably won't leap them, but that is the difference between a 9% chance and a 32% chance at a top 4 pick if we could. If that cluster of teams had a cupcake schedule to finish the year, and we didn't catch hot late as we commonly do.
With few notable exceptions (selections of Giannis, Kawhi) true championship contending teams are built with top end talent. Yes you can make the argument for building a better team with more picks lower down. Trading smart, etc. But those top picks even recruit better offers from teams looking to trade up. If you want to make your stat discussion again, pull out your Pelton chart and discuss the difference between the top 4 and the 12th pick, not the 9th and 12th.
Re: What do we have in the tank?
-
- Rookie
- Posts: 1,122
- And1: 837
- Joined: Mar 28, 2021
Re: What do we have in the tank?
Lots of articles on this but here is a recent one from the Ringer on expected value at each pick -
https://www.theringer.com/2021/7/28/22597310/nba-draft-expectations
Yes, on average, better players are picked higher in the draft, even when considering 9 vs 12.
https://www.theringer.com/2021/7/28/22597310/nba-draft-expectations
Yes, on average, better players are picked higher in the draft, even when considering 9 vs 12.
Can't say I do. Who else gonna shoot?
Re: What do we have in the tank?
- FAH1223
- RealGM
- Posts: 15,875
- And1: 6,970
- Joined: Nov 01, 2005
- Location: Laurel, MD
Re: What do we have in the tank?
We just gotta catch San Antonio, Portland, NOLA and New York. I think we can do it!!!
Re: What do we have in the tank?
- nate33
- Forum Mod - Wizards
- Posts: 67,030
- And1: 19,344
- Joined: Oct 28, 2002
Re: What do we have in the tank?
9 and 20 wrote:Lots of articles on this but here is a recent one from the Ringer on expected value at each pick -
https://www.theringer.com/2021/7/28/22597310/nba-draft-expectations
Yes, on average, better players are picked higher in the draft, even when considering 9 vs 12.
LOL
Ladies and gentlemen, I give you, the brilliant drafting skills of the Washington Wizards:
So the Wizards were the 26th best team in drafting over the past two decades. And they only fared that well because their most successful pick was a no-brainer #1 overall selection. Also, Cleveland is bound to leapfrog us if you update that chart to include the 2021 draft and Evan Mobley. The Kings will probably leapfrog us too with Haliburton. So we are the 3rd worst drafting team of the last two decades.
It's a good thing Ted kept Ernie around so long for "continuity".
Re: What do we have in the tank?
- long suffrin' boulez fan
- General Manager
- Posts: 7,621
- And1: 3,465
- Joined: Nov 18, 2005
- Location: Just above Ted's double bottom line
Re: What do we have in the tank?
nate33 wrote:9 and 20 wrote:Lots of articles on this but here is a recent one from the Ringer on expected value at each pick -
https://www.theringer.com/2021/7/28/22597310/nba-draft-expectations
Yes, on average, better players are picked higher in the draft, even when considering 9 vs 12.
LOL
Ladies and gentlemen, I give you, the brilliant drafting skills of the Washington Wizards:
So the Wizards were the 26th best team in drafting over the past two decades. And they only fared that well because their most successful pick was a no-brainer #1 overall selection. Also, Cleveland is bound to leapfrog us if you update that chart to include the 2021 draft and Evan Mobley. The Kings will probably leapfrog us too with Haliburton. So we are the 3rd worst drafting team of the last two decades.
It's a good thing Ted kept Ernie around so long for "continuity".
Then replaced him with his protege.
In Rizzo we trust
Re: What do we have in the tank?
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 13,841
- And1: 5,316
- Joined: Jul 24, 2016
Re: What do we have in the tank?
Yeah pretty much what Doc said. I’d like to tank even if it just slightly bumps our % chance of landing someone like Holmgren, who is one of the greatest prospects in the history of basketball.
Re: What do we have in the tank?
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 47,909
- And1: 11,579
- Joined: Jul 17, 2001
Re: What do we have in the tank?
NatP4 wrote:Yeah pretty much what Doc said. I’d like to tank even if it just slightly bumps our % chance of landing someone like Holmgren, who is one of the greatest prospects in the history of basketball.
He certainly has skills that nobody his height has ever had. But even if we just move up 3 or 4 in the tank, it could be the difference between getting Keegan Murray or getting someone like Patrick Baldwin Jr. - with the Wiz braintrust picking.
"A common mistake that people make when trying to design something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools." - Douglas Adams
Re: What do we have in the tank?
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,903
- And1: 2,572
- Joined: Jun 12, 2010
Re: What do we have in the tank?
Ruzious wrote:NatP4 wrote:Yeah pretty much what Doc said. I’d like to tank even if it just slightly bumps our % chance of landing someone like Holmgren, who is one of the greatest prospects in the history of basketball.
He certainly has skills that nobody his height has ever had. But even if we just move up 3 or 4 in the tank, it could be the difference between getting Keegan Murray or getting someone like Patrick Baldwin Jr. - with the Wiz braintrust picking.
Cant state this enough. Its top 8 for me. Look at last year 3-8: Mobley, Barnes, Suggs, Giddey, Kuminga, and Wagner..... then look at the rest of the 1st round. Sorry, its not close.
Duarte, Sengun, Kispert... Im sure all will be really good players for a long time, but there is a clear drop off.
Kings and NYK are cooked, but I see SAS, NOP, and LAL as having legit shots on winning some games down the stretch and getting us to ~9 where we at least have a 15-20% shot at the top 4... or at the very least a hope that someone around 6-8 grabs, Davis, TyTy, or Duren.
Re: What do we have in the tank?
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 13,841
- And1: 5,316
- Joined: Jul 24, 2016
Re: What do we have in the tank?
Yep, and last year, Wagner and Giddey were still sitting in the 12-15 range in most mocks right up until draft night. Most of the year, Giddey was in the 20s actually. I highly doubt a guy like Keegan Murray or even Kendall Brown is going to drop down to 12-15. We need to get into that 7-10 range.
Re: What do we have in the tank?
- FAH1223
- RealGM
- Posts: 15,875
- And1: 6,970
- Joined: Nov 01, 2005
- Location: Laurel, MD
Re: What do we have in the tank?
2019
The Grizzlies won one more game than the Wizards.
Grizz moved up 6 spots.
Wiz moved down 3 spots.
Smh
The Grizzlies won one more game than the Wizards.
Grizz moved up 6 spots.
Wiz moved down 3 spots.
Smh
Re: What do we have in the tank?
- Chocolate City Jordanaire
- RealGM
- Posts: 52,634
- And1: 8,994
- Joined: Aug 05, 2001
Re: What do we have in the tank?
How do you rate Kessler?NatP4 wrote:Yep, and last year, Wagner and Giddey were still sitting in the 12-15 range in most mocks right up until draft night. Most of the year, Giddey was in the 20s actually. I highly doubt a guy like Keegan Murray or even Kendall Brown is going to drop down to 12-15. We need to get into that 7-10 range.
Bye bye Beal.
Re: What do we have in the tank?
- Chocolate City Jordanaire
- RealGM
- Posts: 52,634
- And1: 8,994
- Joined: Aug 05, 2001
Re: What do we have in the tank?
I kinda disagree on the top 8.pcbothwel wrote:Ruzious wrote:NatP4 wrote:Yeah pretty much what Doc said. I’d like to tank even if it just slightly bumps our % chance of landing someone like Holmgren, who is one of the greatest prospects in the history of basketball.
He certainly has skills that nobody his height has ever had. But even if we just move up 3 or 4 in the tank, it could be the difference between getting Keegan Murray or getting someone like Patrick Baldwin Jr. - with the Wiz braintrust picking.
Cant state this enough. Its top 8 for me. Look at last year 3-8: Mobley, Barnes, Suggs, Giddey, Kuminga, and Wagner..... then look at the rest of the 1st round. Sorry, its not close.
Duarte, Sengun, Kispert... Im sure all will be really good players for a long time, but there is a clear drop off.
Kings and NYK are cooked, but I see SAS, NOP, and LAL as having legit shots on winning some games down the stretch and getting us to ~9 where we at least have a 15-20% shot at the top 4... or at the very least a hope that someone around 6-8 grabs, Davis, TyTy, or Duren.
https://www.basketball-reference.com/draft/NBA_2021.html
Isaiah Jackson is an absolute stud. I wanted the Wizards to draft him, but others on this board thought he'd be another Gafford.
Tre Mann might have a decent career.
Like Mann, Cam Thomas can definitely score (but sucks on defense as well).
Day'Ron Sharpe, Herb Jones, and Ayo Dosunmu are STUDS drafted way low.
Aaron Wiggins is not much worse if at all than Kispert.
Bye bye Beal.