DCZards wrote:payitforward wrote:We are 13-6 in our last 19 games. Kuz was not a significant factor in a single one of those wins.
Nonsense.
An overstatement on my part:
He was pretty good in the first win vs. the Suns, actually.
He was very good indeed vs. Sac'to!
He went 4-13 against Philly & had 4 turnovers.
(I guess one issue would be -- does someone think that a player can post those numbers in a game & still "help his team win"?
For a person who answers that question "yes, he can," the words "help his team win" simply mean something different from "help his team end the game with more points than the opponent.")Kuz didn't do much in the 2d phoenix game
5 boards & 8 TOs at Orlando.
5-16 plus 5 TOs in the win over Milwaukee
Didn't produce much vs. the Bulls
Not bad not good vs. Knicks
Mediocre in 2d Orlando game (a game we won by 20)
Reasonably good shooting vs. Dallas -- but 5 boards 3 TOs
(I would be more likely to describe him as almost costing us that game than as helping us win it)Pretty good vs. Houston
4 for 13 vs. Pels
Bad vs. SA -- meh, low volume shooting; 6 boards & 5 turnovers.
So that's 1 very good game, 2 pretty good game, 5 mediocre games, & 6 bad ones.
Nobody's obliged to agree with me, of course!
But, if it's interesting to know what exactly I mean, then the Dallas game is a great illustration. Here's the box score:
https://www.espn.com/nba/boxscore/_/gameId/4014688721. Kuz scored 30 points that night, but he was not good. He did not play well overall.
2. Deni only scored 15 points that night, half as many as Kuz. But, he was absolutely terrific.
3. Delon Wright only played 22 minutes, & he only scored 10 points. But, he was even better than Deni.
We won a 1-point game, because those 2 guys played at an incredibly high level. Yet, a casual fan will see a 1-point win & 30 points from Kuzma, & conclude that he carried us -- rather than virtually giving the game away.