CobraCommander wrote:TGW wrote:What's weird is that they were better off just waiving Wall instead of trading him and a first for Westbrook. They're litterally going to end up with an overpaid Kuzma, a bum (Todd) and a possible loss of a first round pick in this whole fiasco.
I think in hindsight trading wall for Westbrook worked out….
But everything after?
Looks like the wiz are still one of The worse led front office in nba. Kuz KP and Beal should be in different uniforms today
Respectfully, Westbrook for KCP, Kuz, & Trez was a great trade!
In effect, we had turned Wall's contract into 3 tradable assets w/ non-trivial value plus a R1 pick, all at the additional cost of a heavily-protected R1 pick.
The problem was that we didn't trade those assets right away & begin to rebuild based on youth, a new generation. Tommy's mistake was in thinking that a tear-down was a rebuild -- all in that one move (plus signing Spencer Dinwiddie).
I imagine it was that thought which moved him to trade for Aaron Holiday as a backup, defense-oriented PG. That's where we actually lost a R1 pick. The one that came in the Westbrook for 3 lakers trade.
To tell the truth, that was more or less what we all thought! That we had done it & were gonna be really good. I had us figured for 45 wins based on historical performances by all the players on the roster. More fool I. & then, when we started off gang busters, it looked like Tommy had done the job.
Wrong. We'd have been much better off had we traded Kuzma immediately. Harrell was a very solid back up Center (as he showed with excellent play through much of the season), but we already had Gafford for that role. Moving him immediately would also have been wise. Ditto KCP. Of course, the trade for them was so complex in itself that involving other teams as destinations for those guys might have been unachievable, & by the time of the trade deadline everything had already fallen apart.
As to signing Dinwiddie, although our locker room seems to have turned into quite a mess, they loved him Dallas for good reason, & Brooklyn was happy to get him back. He's a terrific player, & signing him as a FA was a terrific decision even though it went South. It happens.
Everyone here is so down on Tommy now that there's no interest in giving him credit for the several outstanding moves he's made. Not that anyone could argue for the draft record of his FO team.
Yet, the core problem is elsewhere. The core problem is that we didn't trade Bradley Beal & begin to rebuild. At the time, I mean, when we could have gotten a lot for him. & that decision was Ted's. Period. For that matter, not many on this Board wanted to do it either (a few did -- I was one of them).
But, what we wanted is irrelevant. We weren't making decisions. Ted didn't want to trade him. The mess we are in flows entirely from that failure. From Ted, IOW, not Tommy.
Now... had he drafted well in 2019 (winding up with Clarke & Kendall Johnson -- or more!), 2020 (winding up with Tyrese Haliburton, Desmond Bane & Kenyon Martin) & 2022 (winding up with Tari Eason & at least one other prospect) -- along w/ using that #22 in '21 on, say Isaiah Jackson rather than throwing it away for Holiday -- we'd be a lot better off. Hence, for mismanaging 4 drafts in a row, to a greater or lesser degree, Tommy does get the blame.