The Wizards tank survived a 14 point 4th quarter from AJ & lost by 3 at home to the Nets.
Heat have won their last 4 games. Their last win over Philly was by 23 points.
Wizards need a Heat victory.

Moderators: nate33, montestewart, LyricalRico
dobrojim wrote:UTA 16-59
WSH 16-58
CHA 18-55
NOP 20-54
I forget who it was but someone posted that if we (us and UTA) both lose
out, the number one position would go to us.
Note that our odds of a top 4 would be the same but in the event
that neither team is selected in the lottery (top 4), we win the tiebreaker
and would pick before them based on head to head and point dif in those games.
That said, Tankathon (yeah I know) says a random drawing determines the
order for teams with identical records.
In any case, we could end up tied with UTA and also CHA isn't that far out of the picture.
According to my understanding, our most likely pick is 5th or 6th (neither UTA nor us 'win'
a top 4 slot). If we lose out on a top 4, we cannot fall below 6th.
The NCAA Final Four has not had all four # 1 seeds since 2008.nate33 wrote:dobrojim wrote:UTA 16-59
WSH 16-58
CHA 18-55
NOP 20-54
I forget who it was but someone posted that if we (us and UTA) both lose
out, the number one position would go to us.
Note that our odds of a top 4 would be the same but in the event
that neither team is selected in the lottery (top 4), we win the tiebreaker
and would pick before them based on head to head and point dif in those games.
That said, Tankathon (yeah I know) says a random drawing determines the
order for teams with identical records.
In any case, we could end up tied with UTA and also CHA isn't that far out of the picture.
According to my understanding, our most likely pick is 5th or 6th (neither UTA nor us 'win'
a top 4 slot). If we lose out on a top 4, we cannot fall below 6th.
My daily reminder not to worry too much about the distinction between worst, second-worst and third-worst. They all give us the exact same odds at Flagg, Harper, Bailey and whomever you like best at #4 (probably Edgecombe).
If we fall to second-worst, our pick situation is exactly the same as the team with the worst record in 80% of the scenarios. In that final 20% scenario, we are only talking about a fall of one place from #5 to #6, and historically speaking, the lottery is much more of a crapshoot outside of the top 4 anyhow.
Since the revamped lottery odds 7 years ago, the worst-place finish team has never gotten the #1 pick.
Sarr is young Javale McGee with a three-point shot and good handles.penbeast0 wrote:With all due respect, at this point in his career, it seems every big we face owns Sarr (and Vucevic most likely too). He's a shotblocker but not competent as a man defender yet. Fortunately, we can still hope that as young as he is, he will learn.
Chocolate City Jordanaire wrote:Sarr is young Javale McGee with a three-point shot and good handles.penbeast0 wrote:With all due respect, at this point in his career, it seems every big we face owns Sarr (and Vucevic most likely too). He's a shotblocker but not competent as a man defender yet. Fortunately, we can still hope that as young as he is, he will learn.