Are the Celtics better without KG?
Posted: Fri Feb 1, 2008 3:44 am
They just beat the MAVS!!!
Discuss
Discuss
RealGM
Sports is our Business
https://forums.realgm.com/boards/
Are the Celtics better without KG?
https://forums.realgm.com/boards/viewtopic.php?f=35&t=756536
Page 1 of 1
Posted: Fri Feb 1, 2008 3:57 am
Is the shark better when jumped?
Posted: Fri Feb 1, 2008 4:00 am
now everyone can see how ridiculous the BWOG (better without Gil) talk is...
Posted: Fri Feb 1, 2008 11:06 am
The REAL question is: "Are the Mavs worse with Juwan Howard?"
Posted: Fri Feb 1, 2008 11:19 am
We better see a measurable jump in this team's record when Gil returns, or this whole Q will erupt big time.
Posted: Fri Feb 1, 2008 11:27 am
This question is dumber then "are the Wiz better w/out Arenas"
NO TEAM is better without their best player...2nd best player... 3rd best player... teams are best at full health... or when Etan Thomas is out
NO TEAM is better without their best player...2nd best player... 3rd best player... teams are best at full health... or when Etan Thomas is out
Posted: Fri Feb 1, 2008 11:31 am
^^^
that only holds true if Arenas plays defense when he comes back
that is the only reason the Wizards are playing better, and for some reason Haywood decided to show why he was a lottery pick.
that only holds true if Arenas plays defense when he comes back
that is the only reason the Wizards are playing better, and for some reason Haywood decided to show why he was a lottery pick.
Posted: Fri Feb 1, 2008 11:55 am
All team are better w/o their All-Star player(s). The Wizards are better w/o any All-Stars playing.
I can't believe you even asked this question.
I can't believe you even asked this question.
Posted: Fri Feb 1, 2008 12:17 pm
OK, you got me on this one. I should have read a few more posts.
Why anyone would think a team is better w/o their best player is crazy.
All teams are better with their all-star play(s).
Some people can't see the forest through the trees.
Why anyone would think a team is better w/o their best player is crazy.
All teams are better with their all-star play(s).
Some people can't see the forest through the trees.
Posted: Fri Feb 1, 2008 4:55 pm
FreeBalling wrote:Some people can't see the forest through the trees.
... I can't see your post for your avatar!!!!
Posted: Fri Feb 1, 2008 5:47 pm
Jemini80 wrote:^^^
that only holds true if Arenas plays defense when he comes back
that is the only reason the Wizards are playing better, and for some reason Haywood decided to show why he was a lottery pick.
Brendan Haywood was drafted at #20 in 2001. He was not a lottery pick.
Posted: Fri Feb 1, 2008 7:27 pm
[quote="Jemini80"]^^^
that only holds true if Arenas plays defense when he comes back
quote]
Does Daniels play better defense than Arenas?
that only holds true if Arenas plays defense when he comes back
quote]
Does Daniels play better defense than Arenas?
Posted: Sat Feb 2, 2008 12:36 am
OMG, someone put this thread out of its misery.