ImageImageImageImageImage

Mitch Lawrence: Gil's deal is already done.

Moderators: montestewart, LyricalRico, nate33

fishercob
RealGM
Posts: 13,922
And1: 1,571
Joined: Apr 25, 2002
Location: Tenleytown, DC

Mitch Lawrence: Gil's deal is already done. 

Post#1 » by fishercob » Mon Jun 23, 2008 12:19 am

Mod's, merge if you like, but I thought this deserved it's own thread:

Gilbert Arenas isn't leaving Washington, despite opting out of the last year of his contract, which would have paid him around $13 million next season. Arenas and the Wizards have secretly agreed on a new multi-year deal, according to a GM friend of Washington executive Ernie Grunfeld. ...
"Some people have a way with words....some people....not have way."
— Steve Martin
FreeBalling
Starter
Posts: 2,486
And1: 218
Joined: Jan 30, 2007
 

Re: Mitch Lawrence: Gil's deal is already done. 

Post#2 » by FreeBalling » Mon Jun 23, 2008 12:45 am

fishercob wrote:Mod's, merge if you like, but I thought this deserved it's own thread:

Gilbert Arenas isn't leaving Washington, despite opting out of the last year of his contract, which would have paid him around $13 million next season. Arenas and the Wizards have secretly agreed on a new multi-year deal, according to a GM friend of Washington executive Ernie Grunfeld. ...


That's great news, I see 55 wins next year. Now if we can only draft Roy Hibbert, I'm going to be real happy.
FINAL UPDATE
With full military honors, Master Sgt. James W Holt was laid to rest at Arlington National Cemetery today. May 15
You Are Not Forgotten
RIP Master Sergent Holt :usa:

The ultimate sacrifice http://taskforceomegainc.org/H061.html
dobrojim
RealGM
Posts: 16,671
And1: 3,936
Joined: Sep 16, 2004

Re: Mitch Lawrence: Gil's deal is already done. 

Post#3 » by dobrojim » Mon Jun 23, 2008 1:07 am

Ditto the above

that is except if it turns out that they violated league rules and it ends
up costing us a draft pick or worse.

AFAIK, such a secret deal could indeed be a violation. I'm not sure
what would specifically constitute such a violation. I have my doubts
that GMEG would be a party to an actual violation. The other wild card
is the possible involvement of AJ in such an "understanding" if we are
to believe GA when he stated that AJ should be "taken care of first".
Of course that statement didn't really jive (that well) with his original statement
that he wanted a MAX deal.

All that said, I expect both to be in Wiz unis next season.
A lot of what we call 'thought' is just mental activity

When you are accustomed to privilege, equality feels like oppression

Those who are convinced of absurdities, can be convinced to commit atrocities
User avatar
tsvqt
Veteran
Posts: 2,937
And1: 38
Joined: Jun 03, 2002
Location: Waldorf, Maryland
         

Re: Mitch Lawrence: Gil's deal is already done. 

Post#4 » by tsvqt » Mon Jun 23, 2008 1:20 am

fishercob wrote:Mod's, merge if you like, but I thought this deserved it's own thread:

Gilbert Arenas isn't leaving Washington, despite opting out of the last year of his contract, which would have paid him around $13 million next season. Arenas and the Wizards have secretly agreed on a new multi-year deal, according to a GM friend of Washington executive Ernie Grunfeld. ...


All it tells me is that we will have the exact same team we had last season, although a healthier version....minus RMJr and adding our #18 and VV.

PG - ARENAS, Daniels
SG - STEVENSON, Young
SF- BUTLER, McGuire, #18
PF - JAMISON, Blatche, Songaila, VV
C - HAYWOOD, THOMAS, Pecherov

VV being a D-League'r and Pech being IR/Inactive or #18 going to D-League with VV.

We all do our best GM'n job and put forth our two cents with these elaborate trade ideas, but when the rubber hits the road in Oct/Nov 2009, the above is what you'll likely be looking at.
Retired Air Force
rook6980
Ballboy
Posts: 10
And1: 0
Joined: Jun 21, 2008

Re: Mitch Lawrence: Gil's deal is already done. 

Post#5 » by rook6980 » Mon Jun 23, 2008 1:38 am

I think we're more likely to see:

PG - ARENAS, Daniels, #47 (big combo guard with PG handle)
SG - STEVENSON, Young
SF- BUTLER, McGuire,
PF - JAMISON, Blatche, Songaila, Pecherov
C - HAYWOOD, THOMAS, #18 (Hopefully Hibbert)

And VV back in Russia for another year. Based on what I've seen of his stats, he's not exactly tearing up the Russian leagues; and they're a step below the Euro Leagues at that...
User avatar
tsvqt
Veteran
Posts: 2,937
And1: 38
Joined: Jun 03, 2002
Location: Waldorf, Maryland
         

Re: Mitch Lawrence: Gil's deal is already done. 

Post#6 » by tsvqt » Mon Jun 23, 2008 1:55 am

rook6980 wrote:I think we're more likely to see:

PG - ARENAS, Daniels, #47 (big combo guard with PG handle)
SG - STEVENSON, Young
SF- BUTLER, McGuire,
PF - JAMISON, Blatche, Songaila, Pecherov
C - HAYWOOD, THOMAS, #18 (Hopefully Hibbert)

And VV back in Russia for another year. Based on what I've seen of his stats, he's not exactly tearing up the Russian leagues; and they're a step below the Euro Leagues at that...


Summer League will tell us more on this subject. Summer League helped fool us with Pech right? Why not VV as well?..........
p.s. Please tell me how you divide up the minutes for the 7 big men you have listed. Is Hibbert a D-leaguer or what?
Retired Air Force
User avatar
mohammed10
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,857
And1: 155
Joined: May 26, 2007
Location: Playoffs? Playoffs? Yes, playoffs dammit
 

Re: Mitch Lawrence: Gil's deal is already done. 

Post#7 » by mohammed10 » Mon Jun 23, 2008 2:34 am

A few random thoughts:

If Lawrence's report is accurate, I can't help but think the Commish's office will come calling (remember Joe Smith and Minny?). If that back room deal cost the Wolves, what 3 #1's, I wince to think at what it would cost this franchise, especially after the Minnesota punishment was to serve as a warning to the rest of the league.

If this turns out to be nothing more than a verbal agreement (gulp!), then I'm on board with giving GA far less than the max deal he originally sought (similar to what nate and others have stated in other posts). Final numbers will tell the tale.
If you can fill the unforgiving minute
With sixty seconds’ worth of distance run,
Yours is the Earth and everything that’s in it,
And—which is more—you’ll be a Man, my son!

'If' - by Rudyard Kipling
User avatar
tsvqt
Veteran
Posts: 2,937
And1: 38
Joined: Jun 03, 2002
Location: Waldorf, Maryland
         

Re: Mitch Lawrence: Gil's deal is already done. 

Post#8 » by tsvqt » Mon Jun 23, 2008 2:40 am

mohammed10 wrote:A few random thoughts:

If Lawrence's report is accurate, I can't help but think the Commish's office will come calling (remember Joe Smith and Minny?). If that back room deal cost the Wolves, what 3 #1's, I wince to think at what it would cost this franchise, especially after the Minnesota punishment was to serve as a warning to the rest of the league.

If this turns out to be nothing more than a verbal agreement (gulp!), then I'm on board with giving GA far less than the max deal he originally sought (similar to what nate and others have stated in other posts). Final numbers will tell the tale.


I don't get it....I'm lost in the sauce somewhere. I was under the belief that Gil is now a Free Agent and can sign with anyone for any amount, basically. So if we have got a deal done, then what's the shadyness you guys are speaking of??? Just because Gil and EG didn't put their finances out in public for all to see, what's the problem?
Retired Air Force
User avatar
mohammed10
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,857
And1: 155
Joined: May 26, 2007
Location: Playoffs? Playoffs? Yes, playoffs dammit
 

Re: Mitch Lawrence: Gil's deal is already done. 

Post#9 » by mohammed10 » Mon Jun 23, 2008 2:43 am

Unless I am incorrect, FA doesn't start until July 1st. No FA or someone who has declared for FA can sign before that time. OTW, it is considered a violation of the CBA.

Any other experts out there can verify?
If you can fill the unforgiving minute
With sixty seconds’ worth of distance run,
Yours is the Earth and everything that’s in it,
And—which is more—you’ll be a Man, my son!

'If' - by Rudyard Kipling
80sballboy
RealGM
Posts: 24,116
And1: 5,822
Joined: Jul 15, 2006
       

Re: Mitch Lawrence: Gil's deal is already done. 

Post#10 » by 80sballboy » Mon Jun 23, 2008 2:44 am

I'll believe it when I see it, but if it's true, I'm not jumping for joy. Even with a healthy Gil, we still don't have enough defense to get past the Celts or current Pistons in the playoffs. If it's true, I'm sure Eddie's thrilled though. :wink:
User avatar
mohammed10
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,857
And1: 155
Joined: May 26, 2007
Location: Playoffs? Playoffs? Yes, playoffs dammit
 

Re: Mitch Lawrence: Gil's deal is already done. 

Post#11 » by mohammed10 » Mon Jun 23, 2008 2:47 am

80sballboy wrote:I'll believe it when I see it, but if it's true, I'm not jumping for joy. Even with a healthy Gil, we still don't have enough defense to get past the Celts or current Pistons in the playoffs. If it's true, I'm sure Eddie's thrilled though. :wink:


Couldn't agree more, 80sballboy.
:-?
If you can fill the unforgiving minute
With sixty seconds’ worth of distance run,
Yours is the Earth and everything that’s in it,
And—which is more—you’ll be a Man, my son!

'If' - by Rudyard Kipling
yungal07
Banned User
Posts: 7,161
And1: 2
Joined: Feb 23, 2007
Location: The DMV

Re: Mitch Lawrence: Gil's deal is already done. 

Post#12 » by yungal07 » Mon Jun 23, 2008 2:55 am

80sballboy wrote:I'll believe it when I see it, but if it's true, I'm not jumping for joy. Even with a healthy Gil, we still don't have enough defense to get past the Celts or current Pistons in the playoffs. If it's true, I'm sure Eddie's thrilled though. :wink:


we couldn't beat the celtics or pistons if we lost arenas for nothing, so you wouldn't be jumping for joy regardless of what happened.

i'm just glad the tough part is over with. maybe now the FO can consider moving jamison without the threat of arenas leaving.
miller31time
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 27,575
And1: 2,141
Joined: Jul 25, 2005
Location: Baltimore, MD
     

Re: Mitch Lawrence: Gil's deal is already done. 

Post#13 » by miller31time » Mon Jun 23, 2008 3:11 am

If true, then I'm quasi-relieved the deal is done, but still left wondering how much it's for.

I mean, was there really that much doubt that Arenas would be in a Wizards uniform next season? It would have been awfully unlikely for anything but him signing a new contract with us to happen.

What we've all been worrying about isn't if he'd sign, but for how much. Let's just hope it's a slight increase in pay with the main point being longterm security....heck, with his last injured season (and considering we still payed him millions of dollars to not play basketball in a Wizards uniform) I'm having a hard time trying to tell myself it's fair to even ask for a raise.
User avatar
tsvqt
Veteran
Posts: 2,937
And1: 38
Joined: Jun 03, 2002
Location: Waldorf, Maryland
         

Re: Mitch Lawrence: Gil's deal is already done. 

Post#14 » by tsvqt » Mon Jun 23, 2008 3:12 am

mohammed10 wrote:Unless I am incorrect, FA doesn't start until July 1st. No FA or someone who has declared for FA can sign before that time. OTW, it is considered a violation of the CBA.

Any other experts out there can verify?


OK, true...true....that I know of though, you can have a deal in place. That has happened plenty of times before. You just wait until the witching-hour to actually lay the contract down for a signature. I'm sure EG hasn't done anything shady. Not sure why it's even being discussed.
EG's not S T U P I D.
Retired Air Force
User avatar
Kanyewest
RealGM
Posts: 10,281
And1: 2,684
Joined: Jul 05, 2004

Re: Mitch Lawrence: Gil's deal is already done. 

Post#15 » by Kanyewest » Mon Jun 23, 2008 3:13 am

The Joe Smith scandal is much worse than this. Courtesy of Wiki

"Following the 1999-2000 season, it was discovered that Smith was involved in a salary cap-tampering scandal involving Timberwolves executive Kevin McHale. Smith was allegedly promised a future multi-million dollar deal if he signed with the team for below market value, allowing the team to make some additional player moves in the short term. The league later found out about this violation and voided the last year of the contract, also severely punishing the Timberwolves by taking away five first-round draft picks (though two of the picks were ultimately returned) and fining the team $3.5 million.[1]The move hurt the Timberwolves in the long run, as while the team still found success, the lack of draft picks set the team up for their eventual failure in the mid-2000s."
User avatar
mohammed10
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,857
And1: 155
Joined: May 26, 2007
Location: Playoffs? Playoffs? Yes, playoffs dammit
 

Re: Mitch Lawrence: Gil's deal is already done. 

Post#16 » by mohammed10 » Mon Jun 23, 2008 3:15 am

Thanks kanyewest - that's even worse than I originally thought - 5 1st round picks.

tsqvt - no worries. I hope EG isn't that stupid!
If you can fill the unforgiving minute
With sixty seconds’ worth of distance run,
Yours is the Earth and everything that’s in it,
And—which is more—you’ll be a Man, my son!

'If' - by Rudyard Kipling
User avatar
MJG
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,403
And1: 151
Joined: Aug 14, 2004
Location: Northern Virginia

Re: Mitch Lawrence: Gil's deal is already done. 

Post#17 » by MJG » Mon Jun 23, 2008 4:15 am

With the rumors of Philly making a run at Jamison coming up, it makes me a little curious about this whole thing. I mean, we're all aware that Arenas said he is willing to take on less money if that's what it takes to bring Jamison back. How is that possible though, if he's already secretly agreed to a deal? Is it so low, that the team feels it can bring Jamison back no matter what? Is he just assuming that Jamison will come back at no more than a certain price, and bargained based around that number? Was he just talking out of his ass earlier, and decided not to worry about Jamison and just get his?

Of course, that's all assuming this secret deal is true.
Wizardspride
RealGM
Posts: 17,035
And1: 11,240
Joined: Nov 05, 2004
Location: Olney, MD/Kailua/Kaneohe, HI
       

Re: Mitch Lawrence: Gil's deal is already done. 

Post#18 » by Wizardspride » Mon Jun 23, 2008 4:20 am

MJG wrote:With the rumors of Philly making a run at Jamison coming up, it makes me a little curious about this whole thing. I mean, we're all aware that Arenas said he is willing to take on less money if that's what it takes to bring Jamison back. How is that possible though, if he's already secretly agreed to a deal? Is it so low, that the team feels it can bring Jamison back no matter what? Is he just assuming that Jamison will come back at no more than a certain price, and bargained based around that number? Was he just talking out of his ass earlier, and decided not to worry about Jamison and just get his?

Of course, that's all assuming this secret deal is true.

Or could the Wiz be moving on without Jamison and be in the process of making a big move?
President Trump told two senior Russian officials in a 2017 Oval Office meeting that he was unconcerned about Moscow’s interference in the 2016 U.S. presidential election because the United States did the same in other countries
User avatar
RickRoll_inDC
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,549
And1: 0
Joined: Jun 16, 2005
Location: The 'Loo, Iowa

Re: Mitch Lawrence: Gil's deal is already done. 

Post#19 » by RickRoll_inDC » Mon Jun 23, 2008 4:50 am

or maybe they've 'worked out' deals with both Arenas AND Jamison, and they only found out about Gil's.

I'm not at all concerned that Jamison won't be back next year. We'll have- most likely- remotely the same roster as last year with maybe a small little trade getting a certain poet out of town with a new Big guy in town (or, a new big guy REMAINING in town, if you know what i mean :D )
19-13 on game threads
Skins 2008
Ballboy
Posts: 47
And1: 0
Joined: Jun 22, 2008

Re: Mitch Lawrence: Gil's deal is already done. 

Post#20 » by Skins 2008 » Mon Jun 23, 2008 5:01 am

If no rules were broken then this very good news it is great that Gilbert is coming back.I didn't think
he was going to leave anyways because the Wizards can pay him the most money.

Return to Washington Wizards