Kanyewest wrote:DelMonte West wrote:Kanyewest wrote:You have to remember the Celtics PR machine is playing up Walker because they lost a proven veteran savvy player in Posey. If the price was right, the Celtics would much rather have Posey than Miles and Walker.
Although Celtics fans are well aware of Posey's contributions, our team came disturbingly close to losing in the first round against freaking
Atlanta because we lacked athleticism off the bench, as well as offense off the bench outside of setup 3 pointers. Nobody attacked the rim consistently outside of Pierce, and our offense stagnated when the jumpshots weren't falling.
I'm not saying I'm not upset Posey's left, but our team has become much more athletic and offensively diverse this offseason, and Bill Walker's a big reason why. I remember most of us on the Boston forum wanted him at #30, but considered it a crapshoot since Detroit was rumored to snag him with their 1st (and many thought he had the potential to be taken earlier).
I'd have loved it if Posey returned, but the Celtics would have been insane if they'd offered the full MLE over 4-5 years like he was looking for. I doubt it's just the PR spinning you're making it out to be since Ainge's track record with young talent (regardless of positioning in the mocks) is very good...
But ask yourself this. Do the Celtics win game 4 of the NBA Finals with Walker and Miles instead of James Posey (I think not). While picking up Walker and Miles helps them against certain matchups (like the Hawks), it hurts them in others (like the Lakers, Pistons, and Cavs)
I don't really see how it hurts them as much against the Lakers or Cavs, since Ray Allen/Paul Pierce were primarily responsible for guarding Kobe/LeBron.
Besides, playing the hypotheticals game isn't a viable way of swaying an arguement one way or another. If Scott Pollard doesn't get injured, we don't get PJ Brown, and if he doesn't hit a clutch shot against Cleveland during Game 7 with a minute left, do we even get the chance to make it to the Finals, etc. It helps for one side of the arguement, but is basically a straw man debate.
I'm not trying to troll or anything, nor am I implying Walker will be an all-star, all-rookie 1st teamer, but the way people try to make James Posey a revelation that Boston will be rueing for years to come (despite his very average production, by his standards) seems a wee bit overboard. Yes, he's a fine player, but we still lacked athleticism and offense off the bench. We already know Walker's athletic, and we already know he has the tools to score and defend. Nobody's telling him to replace James Posey; that will be done by committee.
JMO.