Gilbert Arenas as a "pure PG"
Posted: Tue Jun 2, 2009 4:10 am
I have REALLY wanted to say something about this for a while but sadly, my procrastinating self has been upstaged by this:
http://www.bulletsforever.com/2009/6/1/ ... a#comments
Still, I really feel it has to be said, because this misconception has been perpetuated by many well meaning watchers of the Wizards - that the Wizards' problems stem from anything on the offensive side of the ball, that is, that Gilbert Arenas is not a "pure PG".
The article already discusses how we were an elite offensive team with our "not pure PG" every year he was healthy, including #3 in offensive effiiency. But let's add some other tibits of information:
Gilbert Arenas TS%
2004-05: .565
2005-06: .581
2006-07: .565
For reference:
Kobe Bryant TS%
2004-05 .563
2005-06 .559
2006-07 .580
Dwayne Wade TS%
2004-05 .583
2006-07 .583
2008-09 .574
Lebron James TS%
04: .552
05: .568
06: .552
This immediately puts the lie to the notion that Gilbert Arenas is not as good a scorer as the elite players in the NBA.
He also brings comparable win shares (despite having one glaring weakness on the other end), and comparable on/off numbers.
So why are we asking him to NOT be what he's always been - a top 3-5 offensive player in the NBA? Because he plays "PG".
Now, the argument goes "but scoring PGs have never won a title"
Well, let's look at "scoring PGs". I'm going to assume for the purposes of the discussion that one is referring to players like Iverson, Marbury, Francis, and Baron Davis, to list a few.
Iverson's .519 TS% speaks for itself. He's barely more efficient than Eric Snow. Gil has never posted below 540 in a healthy season.
Marbury? .528%.
Baron Davis? .502%.
Franchise posted respectable TS%, but nothing too spectactular. He also never really had a great team around him (did he ever play with Yao?)
Ultimately, more assists and better shot selection from Gilbert would be nice, but nearly every superstar has the same problem. If he could average 28/5/8, that would be amazing. But to argue that Gil not being more like Chris Paul (who gets schooled by elite PGs on a consistent basis) is simply flawed.
"if it ain't broke don't fix it"
"gil's OFFENSIVE game ain't broke"
http://www.bulletsforever.com/2009/6/1/ ... a#comments
Still, I really feel it has to be said, because this misconception has been perpetuated by many well meaning watchers of the Wizards - that the Wizards' problems stem from anything on the offensive side of the ball, that is, that Gilbert Arenas is not a "pure PG".
The article already discusses how we were an elite offensive team with our "not pure PG" every year he was healthy, including #3 in offensive effiiency. But let's add some other tibits of information:
Gilbert Arenas TS%
2004-05: .565
2005-06: .581
2006-07: .565
For reference:
Kobe Bryant TS%
2004-05 .563
2005-06 .559
2006-07 .580
Dwayne Wade TS%
2004-05 .583
2006-07 .583
2008-09 .574
Lebron James TS%
04: .552
05: .568
06: .552
This immediately puts the lie to the notion that Gilbert Arenas is not as good a scorer as the elite players in the NBA.
He also brings comparable win shares (despite having one glaring weakness on the other end), and comparable on/off numbers.
So why are we asking him to NOT be what he's always been - a top 3-5 offensive player in the NBA? Because he plays "PG".
Now, the argument goes "but scoring PGs have never won a title"
Well, let's look at "scoring PGs". I'm going to assume for the purposes of the discussion that one is referring to players like Iverson, Marbury, Francis, and Baron Davis, to list a few.
Iverson's .519 TS% speaks for itself. He's barely more efficient than Eric Snow. Gil has never posted below 540 in a healthy season.
Marbury? .528%.
Baron Davis? .502%.
Franchise posted respectable TS%, but nothing too spectactular. He also never really had a great team around him (did he ever play with Yao?)
Ultimately, more assists and better shot selection from Gilbert would be nice, but nearly every superstar has the same problem. If he could average 28/5/8, that would be amazing. But to argue that Gil not being more like Chris Paul (who gets schooled by elite PGs on a consistent basis) is simply flawed.
"if it ain't broke don't fix it"
"gil's OFFENSIVE game ain't broke"