RealGM

Food/beverage prices over at the VERIZON CENTER are INSANE!!!!!

Have you ever tried to sneak in food or beverages into the VERIZON CENTER before?

How successful or unsuccessful were you?

I remember when they used to let you bring food in; we'd stop at Clydes and my wife would buy a sandwich, and we'd bring a couple of waters in too. Too bad they stopped doing that. My wife still buys some of their junk food, but I only occasionally get a water; I can't stand paying so much for food and water. They check all bags, but if you wear a loose coat open with big pockets, you could probably bring a sandwich or bottled water in, as long as the bulge isn't obvious and the president isn't attending the game.

I have family members who would rather stay home and watch CAPITALS games in HD on our huge 73" television screen than pay the OUTRAGEOUS food and beverage prices over at the VERIZON CENTER. After watching a recent hockey game in HD on the same 73" television screen I do not blame them one bit. Staying home and watching the game in HD on television is by far the best choice.

I live near Verizon Center, so we often eat dinner at home before we go. I've got a partial season package, and wouldn't do a full season, because sometimes we just like to watch the game on TV, get multiple vantage points and replays, and save a lot of money.

What do you expect? Concessions sales are the primary driver of profit for most arenas' business model. From what I understand, venues would barely break even if they had to rely on ticket sales revenue alone. Movie theaters operate under the same model.

So, would folks rather see a 20% hike in ticket prices + reasonably priced refreshments, or the current model? At least under the current system, a cost-conscious fan can decide to go hungry or get cheaper snacks (e.g., water instead of beer) and still see a live game.

keynote wrote:What do you expect? Concessions sales are the primary driver of profit for most arenas' business model. From what I understand, venues would barely break even if they had to rely on ticket sales revenue alone. Movie theaters operate under the same model.

That is exactly what I expect. I also expect sports leagues, owners, and even player's associations to lobby, bribe, and schmooze politicians into handing over vast public subsidies for a private, non-essential industry. Since many (possibly most) taxpayers are already subsidizing athletes salaries and owners profits, I may as well enjoy the game where I can, but I try to eat at home, to save some money for my tax bill and my tickets.

I've gotten Chipotle burritos in. Granted it was the middle of winter and I had a huge coat on.

Though unplanned, I once I had a single Cheetoh in my coat pocket - it got through with no problems. Stale though.

The 1980s and 1990s NBA product was far more enjoyable than what is going on right now.

The ticket prices and food/beverage prices were cheaper back then too.

nice sig hoopa, lol

Wes_Tiny_Abe_ wrote:The 1980s and 1990s NBA product was far more enjoyable than what is going on right now.

The ticket prices and food/beverage prices were cheaper back then too.

"That's the way it was and we LIKED it!"

I don't get to go to too-many of the games and when I do I eat-out at one of the spots. The alternate is that I'll eat before and then just buy a couple of beers at Verizon. I admit to bringing a powerbar, but it is on my person, so I don't consider that to be sneaking.

sneaking something small in shouldn't be too hard.

The thing I object to was that the change from being allowed
to bring in outside food to not being allowed was presented
as something that was being done for our safety. Balderdash.
Be honest about it.

FWIW, I will often pour a beer into a plastic cup and drink
it from where I park in my free parking spot, the location
of which is a closely held secret.

Once recently, I tried to sneak in a banana. Being somewhat endowed for a white, Jewish boy, I thought to strategically hide it in the front of my underwear (briefs) and that no one would notice the difference. I had no problem fooling the female security guards, but there was one particular male guard near the F Street entrance who kept looking at me funny and insisted on searching me all over behind a partition....

Tiny Too wrote:Once recently, I tried to sneak in a banana. Being somewhat endowed for a white, Jewish boy, I thought to strategically hide it in the front of my underwear (briefs) and that no one would notice the difference. I had no problem fooling the female security guards, but there was one particular male guard near the F Street entrance who kept looking at me funny and insisted on searching me all over behind a partition....

Come on man, some of us are still eating lunch.

montestewart wrote:

keynote wrote:What do you expect? Concessions sales are the primary driver of profit for most arenas' business model. From what I understand, venues would barely break even if they had to rely on ticket sales revenue alone. Movie theaters operate under the same model.

That is exactly what I expect. I also expect sports leagues, owners, and even player's associations to lobby, bribe, and schmooze politicians into handing over vast public subsidies for a private, non-essential industry. Since many (possibly most) taxpayers are already subsidizing athletes salaries and owners profits, I may as well enjoy the game where I can, but I try to eat at home, to save some money for my tax bill and my tickets.

The issue is complex; agreed. But while an arena like the Verizon Center is technically non-essential, it has certainly made a measurable positive economic impact on the surrounding neighborhood. No one would advocate sneaking food into all of the new restaurants and bars that have popped up around Fun Street - especially considering that, from all reports, the Verizon Center was funded almost exclusively by Pollin's company.

Now, it doesn't always work. I'm sure there are municipalities who have gambled and invested huge amounts of public funds in a new arena without seeing a desired return in the form of increased business presence and economic activity. But, from what I understand, it certainly worked out in DC.

I'm not saying that I'm guilt-free: I've smuggled snacks into movie theaters, etc., before. But I know that it's not really justifiable. It's like going to a restaurant and stiffing the staff on the tip to save money: If you gotta do that, then you can't really afford that restaurant. Which kinda sucks; but then again, certain restaurants - like Wizards games - are non-essential, as you said. No shame in staying home instead.

When they first banned bringing food or drink in from outside, the stated reasons sounded so preposterous, and I snuck some waters in, but that's kind of a hassle, and I can spring for a water.

I believe Pollin did fund the arena largely by himself, which makes the Wizards organization exceptional in that regard, and I have no particular interest in stiffing him, even if he is charging ridiculous rates for lousy food. I would have no problem doing so at a Nationals and very little at a Redskins game.

PS: Stiffing a waiter on a tip is a lot different, A WHOLE LOT DIFFERENT, than sneaking a water into a Nationals game; taxpayers subsidized that lousy team coming here. How much more can they want? With the Redskins, it's different; I don't even like football, but I hate the Cowboys, and I hate Snyder. If I was offered a Redskins ticket, I might go just to sneak in some food. One less dollar for him to waste on some over-the-hill free agent.

oh, let's highjack this thread immediately to complain about the ridiculous pay structure of the food service industry. the tip fad came and went in europe. are americans just inherently too stubborn?

pancakes3 wrote:oh, let's highjack this thread immediately to complain about the ridiculous pay structure of the food service industry. the tip fad came and went in europe. are americans just inherently too stubborn?

Yes. Plus restaurants can pay waiters half of minimum wage.