Page 2 of 2

Re: Calipari: Good Coach or Good Recruiter?

Posted: Sun Feb 12, 2017 12:38 am
by jrob23
He's a great recruiter and that actually hinders him as a coach. It hurts him because he gets some of the top talent but he only gets about 7 months to even work with them. Because he gets so many great/top recruits he loses out on the next tier of guys because they want playing time and he can't give it to them. So his teams end up being filled out with mostly average or extremely raw players after those top 1 and dones. How is he supposed to coach kids up? Plus, these top recruits are used to doing things their own ways and aren't as receptive to coaching in lots of cases. The one time Calipari had recruits (not top though) and years together with them was at Umass. Being from Western MA that time was magical for me and my friends. But they didn't win and he got severely outcoached in both those elimination games. After all is said and done, he has gotten arguably the best players for most of his career and has what? One championship? imo if he was half the coach he is a recruiter he'd have more titles despite whatever defense he can receive because of the one and done dynamic he helped create.

Re: Calipari: Good Coach or Good Recruiter?

Posted: Thu Feb 16, 2017 3:10 pm
by bwgood77
Read on Twitter

Re: Calipari: Good Coach or Good Recruiter?

Posted: Sat Feb 18, 2017 3:38 pm
by DubCeeSwag
Duke4life831 wrote:If Cal was getting just solid recruiting classes, he wouldn't be talked about as an elite coach which is why I think a NBA team paying big bucks for him would be a huge mistake.


He might catch an owner's eye or something, but there's not a market for his "talents" in the NBA. Donovan and Hoiberg were considered good coaches in college, and they're getting exposed for their lack of X's and O's. Neither are good coaches, but both are better than Calipari.

They've all embraced analytics fairly recently but none are true analytics coaches. Of the 3 FH has the best chance to be "that" kind of coach.

Of the 3 coaches listed Hoiberg is probably the brightest. Even still he's barely above average. I doubt very much Cal could do simple algebra, and Donovan isn't much brighter if he is at all. IIRC Hoiberg did his own analytics, while the other two had to hire assistants that could actually do HS level math. I've also heard Cal doesn't listen to his.

The used car salesman trait that both BD and JC share does them well in college where recruiting is the key to success. In the NBA, it helps them very little. Look at all the really good NBA coaches. They're intelligent, not sly, and slimy.

Fwiw - Ha, I found a quip about Tom Crean ... while seeing if two dumbies like JC and BD use advanced metrics. I also heard him say this in a short interview. He's an idiot. As far as I know, there is no possible way to find weakness in opposing +/-. It's a stupid stat designed to see output of lineups, but it's also dependent on who the opponents opposing lineups have been and other things.. too many things..

What a useless stat, what a useless coach. Talking to hear himself speak and sounding like he doesn't understand a damn thing.

Indiana's Tom Crean is another coach who didn't quite crack the list you see below of analytics-friendly coaches, but he utilizes advanced metrics more and more each season. He said he relies on the plus-minus of opposing lineups to attack certain weaknesses.

Re: Calipari: Good Coach or Good Recruiter?

Posted: Tue Mar 7, 2017 1:48 pm
by ProPlaya98
Coach Cal is a great recruiter, and a solid coach.

Re: Calipari: Good Coach or Good Recruiter?

Posted: Sat Apr 8, 2017 4:41 pm
by sp6r=underrated
oceanlife wrote:Phenomenal recruiter. Good coach, but X's and O's don't matter as much when you have the talent he routinely puts out.

I admire him for not guilt tripping his players into staying instead of going pro. For example: I remember watching Maryland basketball late 90's early 2000's and Gary Williams convinced potential lottery picks like Terrance Morris to stay in school. This was in no way in the players best interest (Morris ended up a second rounder two years later). Gary Williams just wanted to win games and made no secret of that fact.

It helped Gary Williams short term, but he was never able to build up a great reputation of getting kids into the NBA so he never got great recruiting classes.

Enter Calipari. He doesn't like calling his players student athletes, he pushed his players to declare for the draft when he thought they were ready. He built up a reputation with prospects for A) Being upfront with players and B) putting his players first. I even heard it said he cares more about getting kids drafted than winning championships.

Good article on him:

http://www.nydailynews.com/opinion/john-calipari-ncaa-honest-man-article-1.1055394

But a much more compelling case could be made that Calipari is a wolf in a land of foxes. Why? Because he’s honest about the realities of a very corrupt collegiate system that uses terms like “amateurism” as a cover for an operation that generates billions on the backs of unpaid teenagers.

The NCAA’s 14-year Final Four contract with CBS alone is worth $10.8 billion.

The Calipari way relies on recruiting star high schoolers to make a run at a championship before, at age 19 or 20, taking their talents to the NBA. He makes no claim that he is coaching “student-athletes” — a terminology that, much to the NCAA’s chagrin, he refuses to use.

He calls his a “players-first program” and has written that “when the season is over, when our TEAM is done playing, my job is to help them make the best decisions, with the best information I can give them, for them and their families. I’m not trying to convince them to come back if that’s not in their best interest. Likewise, I’m never trying to shove anybody out the door.”


I didn't know this about Cal. My respect for the man went up. The NCAA is a disgrace. At least he acknowledges it.

Re: Calipari: Good Coach or Good Recruiter?

Posted: Mon May 1, 2017 3:39 am
by nolang1
I think Calipari is just as good at talent evaluation as he is at recruiting. Even at Kentucky you can't just handpick the best of the best recruits every year, and it's not like many players outside the top 5-10 in a high school class are especially likely to be one-and-done. You can go through the McDonald's All-American rosters every year and find people who never pan out, yet Kentucky has done quite well in finding those guys like Tyler Ulis and Willie Cauley-Stein who aren't headliners but end up leaving early and playing well enough to stick around in the league.

Re: Calipari: Good Coach or Good Recruiter?

Posted: Sun Oct 15, 2017 9:09 am
by Lalouie
Great recruiter, great communicator with kids and egos, mediocre coach. You realize of course that calipari has never made a final four without a #1 cpoy. All that talent and he still needs a #1 player. There was e even an article, since deleted, of an NBA scout saying his players come in ill prepared for the NBA.

Re: Calipari: Good Coach or Good Recruiter?

Posted: Tue Oct 24, 2017 6:01 pm
by Hoopz Afrik
good coach, great recruiter, phenomenal player advocate

Re: Calipari: Good Coach or Good Recruiter?

Posted: Wed Oct 25, 2017 12:33 am
by Justwar
Lalouie wrote:Great recruiter, great communicator with kids and egos, mediocre coach. You realize of course that calipari has never made a final four without a #1 cpoy. All that talent and he still needs a #1 player. There was e even an article, since deleted, of an NBA scout saying his players come in ill prepared for the NBA.



You make Camby a pair of solid Puerto Rican backcourt, a decent Dana dingle then put yourself in the position to win it all? Yep very good. His defenses always rank high even now because he gets great players to actually play defense as a team. A scout calling his players not prepared probably got fired or it was Jeff goodman

Re: Calipari: Good Coach or Good Recruiter?

Posted: Wed Oct 25, 2017 4:29 am
by Lalouie
Justwar wrote:
Lalouie wrote:Great recruiter, great communicator with kids and egos, mediocre coach. You realize of course that calipari has never made a final four without a #1 cpoy. All that talent and he still needs a #1 player. There was e even an article, since deleted, of an NBA scout saying his players come in ill prepared for the NBA.




You make Camby a pair of solid Puerto Rican backcourt, a decent Dana dingle then put yourself in the position to win it all? Yep very good. His defenses always rank high even now because he gets great players to actually play defense as a team. A scout calling his players not prepared probably got fired or it was Jeff goodman


You recruit athletes they better play good D in college. Cal is 1up on the opposition before the jump ball and everybody knows he just rolls the ball on court..... Please

Oh geeez, you're from ky.... Nevermind

Re: Calipari: Good Coach or Good Recruiter?

Posted: Wed Oct 25, 2017 3:33 pm
by Justwar
So top twenty, and often top 5 defenses are just supposed to happen with freshmen?

Sent from my SM-G900V using RealGM mobile app

Re: Calipari: Good Coach or Good Recruiter?

Posted: Mon Nov 13, 2017 2:07 pm
by ProfessorJM
His transformation of the UMass program is one of the most impressive rises I have ever seen from a coach at any level in any sport. There is also no doubt he is an elite recruiter. I think he is a good, but not great coach when you consider everything.

Re: Calipari: Good Coach or Good Recruiter?

Posted: Thu Jan 18, 2018 9:38 pm
by macNcheese3
bit of both

Re: Calipari: Good Coach or Good Recruiter?

Posted: Sun Feb 4, 2018 3:44 pm
by ahartleyvu
It’s tough to coach freshmen to a championship. As a UK fan, I want to complain about it and wish he would recruit a couple players other than 1 and done players.... but then I realize I’m crazy for hoping he will recruit worse players lol.

Maybe if he grabbed a JUCO player more often, might help?

He does a good job dealing with their egos. He kept Boogie Cousins in check for the most part.

Re: Calipari: Good Coach or Good Recruiter?

Posted: Fri Mar 23, 2018 10:07 am
by miltk
IS THERE ANYTHING LEFT TO SAY?

well, yes. was there ever a smoother paved road to the FF? no, but as i said, cal has never gone far if he didn't have the #1 player in the draft/poy. if the faves hadn't been bounced so early, ky would have been a second round exit. oh wait, that would have been sean miller's zona, yet another underachiever.

Re: Calipari: Good Coach or Good Recruiter?

Posted: Fri Mar 23, 2018 1:01 pm
by DoubleEagle4
miltk wrote:IS THERE ANYTHING LEFT TO SAY?

well, yes. was there ever a smoother paved road to the FF? no, but as i said, cal has never gone far if he didn't have the #1 player in the draft/poy. if the faves hadn't been bounced so early, ky would have been a second round exit. oh wait, that would have been sean miller's zona, yet another underachiever.


A 70% FT shooter went 8-20 from the FT line and UK lost by 3. That's not on the coach. He put them in a position to win the game and they couldn't finish it off. What a horribly officiated game.. over 50 fouls called in a 40 minute game is sickening.

Re: Calipari: Good Coach or Good Recruiter?

Posted: Fri Mar 23, 2018 7:42 pm
by miltk
Pacers__Talk wrote:
miltk wrote:IS THERE ANYTHING LEFT TO SAY?

well, yes. was there ever a smoother paved road to the FF? no, but as i said, cal has never gone far if he didn't have the #1 player in the draft/poy. if the faves hadn't been bounced so early, ky would have been a second round exit. oh wait, that would have been sean miller's zona, yet another underachiever.


A 70% FT shooter went 8-20 from the FT line and UK lost by 3. That's not on the coach. He put them in a position to win the game and they couldn't finish it off. What a horribly officiated game.. over 50 fouls called in a 40 minute game is sickening.


except that i'm talking about cal's HISTORY, so there's a body of work involved. SMITH, ROSE, WALL, AND DAVIS, and so on down the line. the correlation cannot be overstated or overlooked

Re: Calipari: Good Coach or Good Recruiter?

Posted: Sat Mar 24, 2018 10:16 pm
by KidPistol
Recruiter. A bit overrated. This Kentucky season proved it. Give Jay Wright a bunch of top talent one and done recruits and he’d have 3 national championships by now going on potentially 4.

Re: Calipari: Good Coach or Good Recruiter?

Posted: Mon Mar 26, 2018 7:25 am
by whocurrz
miltk wrote:IS THERE ANYTHING LEFT TO SAY?

well, yes. was there ever a smoother paved road to the FF? no, but as i said, cal has never gone far if he didn't have the #1 player in the draft/poy. if the faves hadn't been bounced so early, ky would have been a second round exit. oh wait, that would have been sean miller's zona, yet another underachiever.


UK made the championship game in 2014 with No number 1 pick or college POY. Randle was one of the finalists for the Naismith award in a top 10 pick.

Re: Calipari: Good Coach or Good Recruiter?

Posted: Sun Apr 1, 2018 5:11 pm
by MachoMan
good coach, better recruiter, great duffel bag dropper