Sunday Game Thread

Moderator: bwgood77

panacea
Veteran
Posts: 2,837
And1: 0
Joined: Feb 02, 2007

Sunday Game Thread 

Post#1 » by panacea » Sun Mar 30, 2008 7:58 pm

Anyone watching?

Memphis looks impressive right now. Looking forward to the 2nd game.
Polynice4Pippen
RealGM
Posts: 46,625
And1: 13,149
Joined: May 12, 2006
Location: Planet Earth. With more questions than answers.
     

 

Post#2 » by Polynice4Pippen » Sun Mar 30, 2008 8:45 pm

That Rose/Augustin matchup was pretty one-sided, huh.
Jerry Reinsdorf; the undisputed king of allowing his GM's to run amok with unchecked power and ego. :king:
panacea
Veteran
Posts: 2,837
And1: 0
Joined: Feb 02, 2007

 

Post#3 » by panacea » Sun Mar 30, 2008 9:08 pm

Davidson coming out w/ lots of energy.

Never noticed that the benches were below the court.
panacea
Veteran
Posts: 2,837
And1: 0
Joined: Feb 02, 2007

 

Post#4 » by panacea » Sun Mar 30, 2008 9:21 pm

Davidson on a 7-0 run.
User avatar
wilt
Analyst
Posts: 3,460
And1: 147
Joined: Dec 01, 2003

 

Post#5 » by wilt » Sun Mar 30, 2008 10:10 pm

panacea wrote:Davidson coming out w/ lots of energy.

Never noticed that the benches were below the court.


yeah, that must be kind of weird, i mean with the whole setup of a basketball court build onto a football field with that much space around you.

No matter the end result, this first half of Davidson was just inspired. Kansas is so damn clearly the more talented team but Davidson just ignores that fact. I mean, on the offensive end guys like Sanders and Lovedale are their 3rd/4th best players and they have absolutely no chance 1:1 against any of the players guarding them. But still they and every other of those kids just plays their hearts out and cherishes good plays and just ignore it when they get outplayed.
And it
Image

"Toughness is not just hard fouls and being willing to fight people. Toughness is being 10 down and continuing to do what your coach wants you to do."
Blame Rasho
On Leave
Posts: 42,059
And1: 9,736
Joined: Apr 25, 2002

 

Post#6 » by Blame Rasho » Sun Mar 30, 2008 10:45 pm

46-45 Davidson....
Blame Rasho
On Leave
Posts: 42,059
And1: 9,736
Joined: Apr 25, 2002

 

Post#7 » by Blame Rasho » Sun Mar 30, 2008 10:46 pm

49-45 Davidson... 3-3 for some no name guy...lol
Blame Rasho
On Leave
Posts: 42,059
And1: 9,736
Joined: Apr 25, 2002

 

Post#8 » by Blame Rasho » Sun Mar 30, 2008 10:47 pm

Kansas needs to milk Sasha...

Curry another make... 51-47
panacea
Veteran
Posts: 2,837
And1: 0
Joined: Feb 02, 2007

 

Post#9 » by panacea » Sun Mar 30, 2008 11:04 pm

Looks like the wheels are starting to fall off.
Blame Rasho
On Leave
Posts: 42,059
And1: 9,736
Joined: Apr 25, 2002

 

Post#10 » by Blame Rasho » Sun Mar 30, 2008 11:09 pm

59-57.... 54sec left KU
panacea
Veteran
Posts: 2,837
And1: 0
Joined: Feb 02, 2007

 

Post#11 » by panacea » Sun Mar 30, 2008 11:10 pm

....just kidding
panacea
Veteran
Posts: 2,837
And1: 0
Joined: Feb 02, 2007

 

Post#12 » by panacea » Sun Mar 30, 2008 11:12 pm

Davidson has 17 seconds to make history.
Blame Rasho
On Leave
Posts: 42,059
And1: 9,736
Joined: Apr 25, 2002

 

Post#13 » by Blame Rasho » Sun Mar 30, 2008 11:13 pm

Davidson ball with 17 sec left... 2 point game...
panacea
Veteran
Posts: 2,837
And1: 0
Joined: Feb 02, 2007

 

Post#14 » by panacea » Sun Mar 30, 2008 11:15 pm

What a TERRIBLE play to end the game. What's Curry thinking?
Blame Rasho
On Leave
Posts: 42,059
And1: 9,736
Joined: Apr 25, 2002

 

Post#15 » by Blame Rasho » Sun Mar 30, 2008 11:16 pm

Well that shows all of us that he more of a shooting guard than point guard...
Raptor_Guy
General Manager
Posts: 8,730
And1: 3,184
Joined: Feb 20, 2005
Location: Toronto
       

 

Post#16 » by Raptor_Guy » Sun Mar 30, 2008 11:19 pm

Whats with the plays out of Davidson timeouts? First they commit a horrible turnover out of a timeout, then that horrible play..
User avatar
wilt
Analyst
Posts: 3,460
And1: 147
Joined: Dec 01, 2003

 

Post#17 » by wilt » Sun Mar 30, 2008 11:27 pm

all it showed is that he made a mistake. If anyone seriously starts talking about that one play i
Image



"Toughness is not just hard fouls and being willing to fight people. Toughness is being 10 down and continuing to do what your coach wants you to do."
writerman
Banned User
Posts: 6,836
And1: 5
Joined: Sep 02, 2002

Four Number One Seeds 

Post#18 » by writerman » Mon Mar 31, 2008 2:32 am

This is exactly why I pay little or no attention to college ball.

It's all fixed to assure the rich get richer, and it's as predictable as tornado waether in July. Every year, it's the same names, the same teams, the same everything.

Oh sure, every once in a while the big boys will slip up and let in an upstart, like Gonzaga or this year, Davidson.

But they never win. They never get the brass ring.

You can count on every year hearing that annoying jerk Dick Vitale endlessly gushing about which one out of the couple dozen or so elect programs has their turn this year in the finals.

It all fixed--the RPI thing, all based on totally subjective evaluations that reward the rich and assures they will stay rich and/or get richer. The elect conferences get 6 or more teams, while the midmajors are lucky if the gods of the NCAA grant them more than one. The elite programs--calcified by the system into elite status--even get to essentially play on their home courts, as I understand the Tarheels got to this year. Nauseating.

And you know what's really irritating? I strongly suspect way back when somewhere all today's biggies were cheats, were dirty. That's how they got big. And I also suspect there's still plenty of dirt going on on their parts right now--they just have the money and power to sweep it under the rug, or have perfected the process of cheating to the point they never get caught. Only the upstarts do. Every few years that useless-arse NCAA carts some hapless midmajor up to the gallows to keep the peasants in their place. Never happens to the big guys.

That's why I like the NBA. There's the lottery and the draft, and because of that the have nots have the chance to catch the brass ring that just isn't there in college ball. The athletes are better too. In college, with so many underclassmen doing the sensible thing and going pro, you essentially today have a bunch of sub-par professionals pretending to be "student athletes." :roll:

And most of all, in the pros the money is up front, not under the table.
Polynice4Pippen
RealGM
Posts: 46,625
And1: 13,149
Joined: May 12, 2006
Location: Planet Earth. With more questions than answers.
     

Re: Four Number One Seeds 

Post#19 » by Polynice4Pippen » Mon Mar 31, 2008 5:34 am

writerman wrote:This is exactly why I pay little or no attention to college ball.

It's all fixed to assure the rich get richer, and it's as predictable as tornado waether in July. Every year, it's the same names, the same teams, the same everything.

Oh sure, every once in a while the big boys will slip up and let in an upstart, like Gonzaga or this year, Davidson.

But they never win. They never get the brass ring.

You can count on every year hearing that annoying jerk Dick Vitale endlessly gushing about which one out of the couple dozen or so elect programs has their turn this year in the finals.

It all fixed--the RPI thing, all based on totally subjective evaluations that reward the rich and assures they will stay rich and/or get richer. The elect conferences get 6 or more teams, while the midmajors are lucky if the gods of the NCAA grant them more than one. The elite programs--calcified by the system into elite status--even get to essentially play on their home courts, as I understand the Tarheels got to this year. Nauseating.

And you know what's really irritating? I strongly suspect way back when somewhere all today's biggies were cheats, were dirty. That's how they got big. And I also suspect there's still plenty of dirt going on on their parts right now--they just have the money and power to sweep it under the rug, or have perfected the process of cheating to the point they never get caught. Only the upstarts do. Every few years that useless-arse NCAA carts some hapless midmajor up to the gallows to keep the peasants in their place. Never happens to the big guys.

That's why I like the NBA. There's the lottery and the draft, and because of that the have nots have the chance to catch the brass ring that just isn't there in college ball. The athletes are better too. In college, with so many underclassmen doing the sensible thing and going pro, you essentially today have a bunch of sub-par professionals pretending to be "student athletes." :roll:

And most of all, in the pros the money is up front, not under the table.


Most people who don't like mushrooms don't eat mushrooms. Likewise, most people who don't like college basketball don't make long winded posts in college basketball threads. Life is short. I suggest you try something you'd find a little more enjoyable than posting on college basketball message boards.
Jerry Reinsdorf; the undisputed king of allowing his GM's to run amok with unchecked power and ego. :king:
CircleCitysportsfan
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,868
And1: 81
Joined: Dec 07, 2004
Location: Hamilton County
Contact:
     

 

Post#20 » by CircleCitysportsfan » Mon Mar 31, 2008 7:22 am

Curry should of not have had the ball to begin with. He's a catch and shoot player, he should of been coming off screens for that shot.

Return to NCAA Basketball