Final Four: Memphis vs UCLA

Moderator: bwgood77

Who Wins?

UCLA
18
50%
Memphis
18
50%
 
Total votes: 36

User avatar
UrbanLegendMD
General Manager
Posts: 8,716
And1: 11
Joined: Jul 30, 2004
Location: Pilsen

 

Post#41 » by UrbanLegendMD » Sun Apr 6, 2008 12:51 am

The Love/Hansbrough comparisons are basically apples and oranges. Love is far more skilled. Hansbrough is a flat out grunt, tougher and more athletic. A worker bee so to speak. Love is younger, a better passer, shooter, ball handler and has better post skills. They put up similar numbers and were just dominant. But in the end they are vastly different players.


I didn't compare their skills, but their draft position. Love has the skills of a point forward, but I don't think he has the athleticism or scoring ability to put the pressure on the defense at the next level. Basically, he will be relegated to the role player and as a result he will not be allowed to display creativity and his feel for the game. Hansborough on the other hand has everything you need from a hustle player, so you can make an argument he is a better prospect than Love considering the role the two will play at the next level.
First the federal government borrowed money; then gave the money to Bank of America; then I borrowed some of that money from Bank of America and gave it to the federal government; then the federal government gave the money back to Bank of America.
Polynice4Pippen
RealGM
Posts: 46,624
And1: 13,149
Joined: May 12, 2006
Location: Planet Earth. With more questions than answers.
     

 

Post#42 » by Polynice4Pippen » Sun Apr 6, 2008 1:15 am

NurbekIL wrote:
The Love/Hansbrough comparisons are basically apples and oranges. Love is far more skilled. Hansbrough is a flat out grunt, tougher and more athletic. A worker bee so to speak. Love is younger, a better passer, shooter, ball handler and has better post skills. They put up similar numbers and were just dominant. But in the end they are vastly different players.


I didn't compare their skills, but their draft position. Love has the skills of a point forward, but I don't think he has the athleticism or scoring ability to put the pressure on the defense at the next level. Basically, he will be relegated to the role player and as a result he will not be allowed to display creativity and his feel for the game. Hansborough on the other hand has everything you need from a hustle player, so you can make an argument he is a better prospect than Love considering the role the two will play at the next level.


Good point. If I had a late lottery pick and both were on the board though I'd take Love. I think he can do a lot of the things guys like Scola and Oberto and Vlade Divac before them did. Hansbrough reminds me a lot of Paul Millsapp and Jason Maxiell, both pretty good players. Just a matter of taste really.
Jerry Reinsdorf; the undisputed king of allowing his GM's to run amok with unchecked power and ego. :king:
User avatar
evildallas
General Manager
Posts: 9,412
And1: 0
Joined: Aug 11, 2005
Location: in the land of weak ownership
Contact:

 

Post#43 » by evildallas » Sun Apr 6, 2008 4:49 am

Well, I'm sad because UCLA could have given me my pool, but Memphis dominated and deserved it. On draft stock, Joey Dorsey had to go up. I know he's 24, but Joey Dorsey should be a late first round pick and contribute minutes instantly as an NBA PF. So much for my hopes of Atlanta acquiring a 2nd rounder draft night and stealing him.

Kevin Love has some good skills, but I think his stock had to take a hit because today showed how athletic big men can affect his game. They're quite a few of those in the NBA.
Going to donkey punch a leprechaun!
User avatar
commadoor 64
Starter
Posts: 2,298
And1: 26
Joined: Jan 30, 2007

 

Post#44 » by commadoor 64 » Sun Apr 6, 2008 6:51 am

UGA Hayes
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 27,537
And1: 16,070
Joined: Jan 05, 2004
Location: real gm

 

Post#45 » by UGA Hayes » Sun Apr 6, 2008 3:18 pm

I don't know how you can blame Love for not doing anything in the second half. He basically got no touches (for once Billy Packer was right).

Its amazing how protected many college coaches are. If Doc Rivers ever made some of the coaching decisions Ben Howland made yesterday I would be screaming for his head. How hard was it to see that collison was completely overmatched on both ends. Was it really that hard to figure how much better UCLA was playing with Westbrook at the point. Could you got Love at least one touch? How about throwing in a zone every once in a while to mix things up against a team that was slashing the hell out of you. Sheesh.
Doctor MJ
Senior Mod
Senior Mod
Posts: 50,790
And1: 19,485
Joined: Mar 10, 2005
Location: Cali
     

 

Post#46 » by Doctor MJ » Sun Apr 6, 2008 9:00 pm

UGA Hayes wrote:I don't know how you can blame Love for not doing anything in the second half. He basically got no touches (for once Billy Packer was right).

Its amazing how protected many college coaches are. If Doc Rivers ever made some of the coaching decisions Ben Howland made yesterday I would be screaming for his head. How hard was it to see that collison was completely overmatched on both ends. Was it really that hard to figure how much better UCLA was playing with Westbrook at the point. Could you got Love at least one touch? How about throwing in a zone every once in a while to mix things up against a team that was slashing the hell out of you. Sheesh.


I could certainly be wrong, but my feeling was that Howland didn't see having a ton of choice. If Collison's in the game, he's going to be overmatched by whoever he faces, and if Collison's not in the game you either have to go big or have to put in somehow of much lower caliber. The former of course would play right in to the problems UCLA was having with the interior being too crowded for Love to operate in. The latter has obvious problems, you really going to put your season on the line with a player who scored 15 points all year over a guy who averages that in a game?

To me the lesson here one that's no surprise: If you've only got 3 perimeter players, you're incredibly vulnerable to a team that can mismatch you there.
Getting ready for the RealGM 100 on the PC Board

Come join the WNBA Board if you're a fan!
Lord Ashram
Sophomore
Posts: 141
And1: 0
Joined: Jan 21, 2007

 

Post#47 » by Lord Ashram » Mon Apr 7, 2008 12:44 am

Love will be just fine in the NBA. He has good vision and a nice touch.

I think Rose will be a STUD, after he wins a title of course.

And Tyler from UNC will be a perfectly acceptable NBA player. He might not be an all-star, but I think he'll be a 8 and 6 type, which every team needs.
UGA Hayes
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 27,537
And1: 16,070
Joined: Jan 05, 2004
Location: real gm

 

Post#48 » by UGA Hayes » Mon Apr 7, 2008 9:19 pm

Doctor MJ wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



I could certainly be wrong, but my feeling was that Howland didn't see having a ton of choice. If Collison's in the game, he's going to be overmatched by whoever he faces, and if Collison's not in the game you either have to go big or have to put in somehow of much lower caliber. The former of course would play right in to the problems UCLA was having with the interior being too crowded for Love to operate in. The latter has obvious problems, you really going to put your season on the line with a player who scored 15 points all year over a guy who averages that in a game?

To me the lesson here one that's no surprise: If you've only got 3 perimeter players, you're incredibly vulnerable to a team that can mismatch you there.


I would have switched westbrook to the one, Ship 2, Moute 3, Keefe/aboye 4 , Love 5. Memphis had a huge size advantage on the perimeter otherwise. Plus Howland actually had to use such a lineup and did so with success for chunks of the regular season, so its not like it was a completely out of the blue lineup. Also the refusal to isolate all the Memphis guys with 3 fouls early really irked me.

Return to NCAA Basketball