Gold Dragon's 2016 Mock
Moderators: Duke4life831, Marcus
Gold Dragon's 2016 Mock
- Gold Dragon
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 4,019
- And1: 4,598
- Joined: Jul 02, 2006
- Location: Oz
-
Gold Dragon's 2016 Mock
http://basketball.realgm.com/nba/draft/draft_simulator/view/161310/
This ranking is based more on talent and risk, focusing on those players I think will most likely be successful in the NBA. Sometimes that meant taking the safe low upside player over the boom-bust types. Team needs were not emphasized as much so some of the fits may not be great but many seemed to fit really well.
This ranking is based more on talent and risk, focusing on those players I think will most likely be successful in the NBA. Sometimes that meant taking the safe low upside player over the boom-bust types. Team needs were not emphasized as much so some of the fits may not be great but many seemed to fit really well.
Re: Gold Dragon's March 9 Mock
-
- Nuggets Forum Mock Draft Champ
- Posts: 14,085
- And1: 5,443
- Joined: Jun 02, 2014
-
Re: Gold Dragon's March 9 Mock
If the Nuggets are selecting Hield at #7, no need to pick Allen at #18 with Harris and Barton already on board. I'd take Baldwin there.
Texas Chuck wrote:I'd like to see Utah, and Denver lose
Exactly as I've been saying all along !!
Re: Gold Dragon's March 9 Mock
- Gold Dragon
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 4,019
- And1: 4,598
- Joined: Jul 02, 2006
- Location: Oz
-
Re: Gold Dragon's March 9 Mock
skywalker33 wrote:If the Nuggets are selecting Hield at #7, no need to pick Allen at #18 with Harris and Barton already on board. I'd take Baldwin there.
I agree. I tried not to give too much attention to fit and depth charts, but focused more who I felt was most likely to be a productive and useful NBA player. I figured the draft order will likely change quite a bit between now and then.
Re: Gold Dragon's March 9 Mock
-
- Freshman
- Posts: 95
- And1: 61
- Joined: Jan 26, 2016
-
Re: Gold Dragon's March 9 Mock
Gold Dragon wrote:http://basketball.realgm.com/nba/draft/draft_simulator/view/161310/
This ranking is based more on talent and risk, focusing on those players I think will most likely be successful in the NBA. Sometimes that meant taking the safe low upside player over the boom-bust types. Team needs were not emphasized as much so some of the fits may not be great but many seemed to fit really well.
Suns won't take Murray at 3.
Knight, Booker, Goodwin and (possibly) Bogdanovic can play the 2.
Off course, there could be trades, but I don't see them selling low on Knight og casting of the new face of the franchise.
Re: Gold Dragon's March 9 Mock
- Gold Dragon
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 4,019
- And1: 4,598
- Joined: Jul 02, 2006
- Location: Oz
-
Re: Gold Dragon's March 9 Mock
Bjorpa wrote:Gold Dragon wrote:http://basketball.realgm.com/nba/draft/draft_simulator/view/161310/
This ranking is based more on talent and risk, focusing on those players I think will most likely be successful in the NBA. Sometimes that meant taking the safe low upside player over the boom-bust types. Team needs were not emphasized as much so some of the fits may not be great but many seemed to fit really well.
Suns won't take Murray at 3.
Knight, Booker, Goodwin and (possibly) Bogdanovic can play the 2.
Off course, there could be trades, but I don't see them selling low on Knight og casting of the new face of the franchise.
I agree the Suns are unlikely to take Murray. They are currently third and Murray is the guy I see as the third most likely to be a highly successful NBA player in this class. As I said, fit was not my priority since the draft order is likely to be different when all is said and done. Ceilings of players and likelihood of hitting that ceiling were my priorities. Sometimes that also led to a good fit but many times it did not.
Re: Gold Dragon's March 9 Mock
-
- Nuggets Forum Mock Draft Champ
- Posts: 14,085
- And1: 5,443
- Joined: Jun 02, 2014
-
Re: Gold Dragon's March 9 Mock
With March Madness coming, I'm interested in seeing what that'll have on your rankings for the draft
Texas Chuck wrote:I'd like to see Utah, and Denver lose
Exactly as I've been saying all along !!
Re: Gold Dragon's March 9 Mock
- Gold Dragon
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 4,019
- And1: 4,598
- Joined: Jul 02, 2006
- Location: Oz
-
Re: Gold Dragon's March 9 Mock
Pre-tournament rankings
Tier 1
Brandon Ingram
Ben Simmons
Tier 2
Jamal Murray
Kris Dunn
Jaylen Brown
Dragan Bender
Jakob Poeltl
Tier 3
Buddy Hield
Timothe Luwawu
Denzel Valentine
Tier 4
Marquese Chriss - if declares
Dejounte Murray - if declares
Deyonta Davis
Ivan Rabb
Demetrius Jackson
Henry Ellenson
Tier 5
Skal Labissiere
Damian Jones
Grayson Allen
Taurean Prince
Melo Trimble
Furkan Korkmaz
Wade Baldwin IV
Isaia Cordinier
Malik Beasley
Tyler Ulis
Juan Hernangomez
Tier 6
Damantas Sabonis
Stephen Zimmerman
Diamond Stone
Jonathan Jeanne
Jarrod Uthoff
Caris LeVert
Tier 1
Brandon Ingram
Ben Simmons
Tier 2
Jamal Murray
Kris Dunn
Jaylen Brown
Dragan Bender
Jakob Poeltl
Tier 3
Buddy Hield
Timothe Luwawu
Denzel Valentine
Tier 4
Marquese Chriss - if declares
Dejounte Murray - if declares
Deyonta Davis
Ivan Rabb
Demetrius Jackson
Henry Ellenson
Tier 5
Skal Labissiere
Damian Jones
Grayson Allen
Taurean Prince
Melo Trimble
Furkan Korkmaz
Wade Baldwin IV
Isaia Cordinier
Malik Beasley
Tyler Ulis
Juan Hernangomez
Tier 6
Damantas Sabonis
Stephen Zimmerman
Diamond Stone
Jonathan Jeanne
Jarrod Uthoff
Caris LeVert
Re: Gold Dragon's March 9 Mock
- Gold Dragon
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 4,019
- And1: 4,598
- Joined: Jul 02, 2006
- Location: Oz
-
Re: Gold Dragon's March 9 Mock
My mid tourney big board. Not a mock draft as team needs did not factor into the picks. My priorities were NBA ceilings and floors and likelihood of reaching those ceilings and floors.
http://basketball.realgm.com/nba/draft/draft_simulator/view/165142/
Bender and Brown will probably move up from here during the pre-draft process. Probably Skal as well.
http://basketball.realgm.com/nba/draft/draft_simulator/view/165142/
Bender and Brown will probably move up from here during the pre-draft process. Probably Skal as well.
Re: Gold Dragon's 2016 Big Board
-
- Junior
- Posts: 272
- And1: 50
- Joined: Jul 16, 2015
-
Re: Gold Dragon's 2016 Big Board
Gold Dragon wrote:Pre-tournament rankings
Tier 1
Brandon Ingram
Ben Simmons
Tier 2
Jamal Murray
Kris Dunn
Jaylen Brown
Dragan Bender
Jakob Poeltl
Tier 3
Buddy Hield
Timothe Luwawu
Denzel Valentine
Tier 4
Marquese Chriss - if declares
Dejounte Murray - if declares
Deyonta Davis
Ivan Rabb
Demetrius Jackson
Henry Ellenson
Tier 5
Skal Labissiere
Damian Jones
Grayson Allen
Taurean Prince
Melo Trimble
Furkan Korkmaz
Wade Baldwin IV
Isaia Cordinier
Malik Beasley
Tyler Ulis
Juan Hernangomez
Tier 6
Damantas Sabonis
Stephen Zimmerman
Diamond Stone
Jonathan Jeanne
Jarrod Uthoff
Caris LeVert
Deyonta Davis - if declares
Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums
Re: Gold Dragon's 2016 Big Board
- Gold Dragon
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 4,019
- And1: 4,598
- Joined: Jul 02, 2006
- Location: Oz
-
Re: Gold Dragon's 2016 Big Board
Final four big board
Tier 1
Ingram
Simmons
Hield
Tier 2
Murray
Dunn
Bender
Brown
Poeltl
Tier 3
Luwawu
Chriss
Valentine
Dejounte Murray
Demetrius Jackson
Prince
Tier 4
Skal
Deyonta Davis - if declares
Rabb
Furkan
Grayson Allen
Ellenson
Sabonis
Tier 5
Bentil
Trimble
Ulis
Brice Johnson
Bembry
Cordinier
Malik Beasley
Damian jones
Wade Baldwin
Tier 6
Stone
Zubac
Jeanne
Thomas Bryant
Hernangomez
Zimmerman
Brogdon
Selden
Levert
Utoff
Hayes
Tier 1
Ingram
Simmons
Hield
Tier 2
Murray
Dunn
Bender
Brown
Poeltl
Tier 3
Luwawu
Chriss
Valentine
Dejounte Murray
Demetrius Jackson
Prince
Tier 4
Skal
Deyonta Davis - if declares
Rabb
Furkan
Grayson Allen
Ellenson
Sabonis
Tier 5
Bentil
Trimble
Ulis
Brice Johnson
Bembry
Cordinier
Malik Beasley
Damian jones
Wade Baldwin
Tier 6
Stone
Zubac
Jeanne
Thomas Bryant
Hernangomez
Zimmerman
Brogdon
Selden
Levert
Utoff
Hayes
Re: Gold Dragon's 2016 Big Board
- Gold Dragon
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 4,019
- And1: 4,598
- Joined: Jul 02, 2006
- Location: Oz
-
Re: Gold Dragon's 2016 Big Board
An actual Mock where I tried to consider team needs and fit.
http://basketball.realgm.com/nba/draft/draft_simulator/view/170510/
Compared to my big board, Bender went up, Poeltl fell and Ulis went higher because of fit. Otherwise most this followed my big board. The Bentil and Baldwin picks were not great fits consider players picked ahead of them but I felt the teams might want to have 2 gos at addressing a percieved need and they were next on my board.
http://basketball.realgm.com/nba/draft/draft_simulator/view/170510/
Compared to my big board, Bender went up, Poeltl fell and Ulis went higher because of fit. Otherwise most this followed my big board. The Bentil and Baldwin picks were not great fits consider players picked ahead of them but I felt the teams might want to have 2 gos at addressing a percieved need and they were next on my board.
Re: Gold Dragon's 2016 Big Board
- wildvikeswolves
- Starter
- Posts: 2,025
- And1: 577
- Joined: Feb 12, 2009
-
Re: Gold Dragon's 2016 Big Board
Gold Dragon wrote:An actual Mock where I tried to consider team needs and fit.
http://basketball.realgm.com/nba/draft/draft_simulator/view/170510/
Compared to my big board, Bender went up, Poeltl fell and Ulis went higher because of fit. Otherwise most this followed my big board. The Bentil and Baldwin picks were not great fits consider players picked ahead of them but I felt the teams might want to have 2 gos at addressing a percieved need and they were next on my board.
Jamaal Murray over Dunn for Wolves
Re: Gold Dragon's 2016 Big Board
- Gold Dragon
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 4,019
- And1: 4,598
- Joined: Jul 02, 2006
- Location: Oz
-
Re: Gold Dragon's 2016 Big Board
wildvikeswolves wrote:Gold Dragon wrote:An actual Mock where I tried to consider team needs and fit.
http://basketball.realgm.com/nba/draft/draft_simulator/view/170510/
Compared to my big board, Bender went up, Poeltl fell and Ulis went higher because of fit. Otherwise most this followed my big board. The Bentil and Baldwin picks were not great fits consider players picked ahead of them but I felt the teams might want to have 2 gos at addressing a percieved need and they were next on my board.
Jamaal Murray over Dunn for Wolves
Yeah, I was having a hard time with that choice. I was trying to decide if the organization was sold enough on Lavine or Rubio going forward and decided that Rubio was the one they would want to move on from.
Is that not the case? Is Lavine still too much of a wildcard?
I just think with a lineup of Lavine, Wiggins and Kat, who are more finishers than creators, you would need more of a true PG like Dunn than Murray.
Re: Gold Dragon's 2016 Big Board
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 38,750
- And1: 22,816
- Joined: Oct 08, 2013
-
Re: Gold Dragon's 2016 Big Board
Gold Dragon wrote:An actual Mock where I tried to consider team needs and fit.
http://basketball.realgm.com/nba/draft/draft_simulator/view/170510/
Compared to my big board, Bender went up, Poeltl fell and Ulis went higher because of fit. Otherwise most this followed my big board. The Bentil and Baldwin picks were not great fits consider players picked ahead of them but I felt the teams might want to have 2 gos at addressing a percieved need and they were next on my board.
Please let us get Skal that late
Re: Gold Dragon's 2016 Big Board
- Gold Dragon
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 4,019
- And1: 4,598
- Joined: Jul 02, 2006
- Location: Oz
-
Re: Gold Dragon's 2016 Big Board
MotownMadness wrote:Gold Dragon wrote:An actual Mock where I tried to consider team needs and fit.
http://basketball.realgm.com/nba/draft/draft_simulator/view/170510/
Compared to my big board, Bender went up, Poeltl fell and Ulis went higher because of fit. Otherwise most this followed my big board. The Bentil and Baldwin picks were not great fits consider players picked ahead of them but I felt the teams might want to have 2 gos at addressing a percieved need and they were next on my board.
Please let us get Skal that late
Picks 15-20 will be a run on all the PF/C that don't belong in the lottery with A PG, likely Ulis, going to Utah.
I'm not really sure how teams will look at these guys and could see Boston, Denver or Indiana taking him before the Pistons pick. But he easily has the highest bust potential of the group. Drummond might be able to mask some of his deficiencies long term making it a worthwhile risk for them.
Re: Gold Dragon's 2016 Big Board
-
- Starter
- Posts: 2,293
- And1: 820
- Joined: Aug 02, 2006
-
Re: Gold Dragon's 2016 Big Board
If Skal goes before our pick, maybe the Pistons can draft Thon Maker
Re: Gold Dragon's 2016 Big Board
- Gold Dragon
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 4,019
- And1: 4,598
- Joined: Jul 02, 2006
- Location: Oz
-
Re: Gold Dragon's 2016 Big Board
SAKURABA216 wrote:If Skal goes before our pick, maybe the Pistons can draft Thon Maker
I think after pick 20 there are no wrong picks. Sure Thon may be a good gamble there. Personally I don't think he is worth the risk until the early second round but everyone after pick 20 is a pretty significant gamble especially with Grayson Allen out of the picture. I'm not sure going back will be a good move for Grayson. I guess we'll see.
Re: Gold Dragon's 2016 Big Board
- wildvikeswolves
- Starter
- Posts: 2,025
- And1: 577
- Joined: Feb 12, 2009
-
Re: Gold Dragon's 2016 Big Board
Gold Dragon wrote:wildvikeswolves wrote:Gold Dragon wrote:An actual Mock where I tried to consider team needs and fit.
http://basketball.realgm.com/nba/draft/draft_simulator/view/170510/
Compared to my big board, Bender went up, Poeltl fell and Ulis went higher because of fit. Otherwise most this followed my big board. The Bentil and Baldwin picks were not great fits consider players picked ahead of them but I felt the teams might want to have 2 gos at addressing a percieved need and they were next on my board.
Jamaal Murray over Dunn for Wolves
Yeah, I was having a hard time with that choice. I was trying to decide if the organization was sold enough on Lavine or Rubio going forward and decided that Rubio was the one they would want to move on from.
Is that not the case? Is Lavine still too much of a wildcard?
I just think with a lineup of Lavine, Wiggins and Kat, who are more finishers than creators, you would need more of a true PG like Dunn than Murray.
Our needs are 3 point shooting and PF. Dunns inability to shoot really draws me away. Murray provides the shooting and the ability to run a little PG if need be
Re: Gold Dragon's 2016 Big Board
- Gold Dragon
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 4,019
- And1: 4,598
- Joined: Jul 02, 2006
- Location: Oz
-
Re: Gold Dragon's 2016 Big Board
- Gold Dragon
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 4,019
- And1: 4,598
- Joined: Jul 02, 2006
- Location: Oz
-
Re: Gold Dragon's 2016 Big Board
Post coin flip mock if Brown and Rabb return.
http://basketball.realgm.com/nba/draft/draft_simulator/view/178286/
http://basketball.realgm.com/nba/draft/draft_simulator/view/178286/