Page 1 of 3
Fischella's NBA Mock Draft 2017
Posted: Sat Sep 3, 2016 10:53 am
by No-Man
Re: Fischella's NBA Mock Draft 2017
Posted: Sat Sep 3, 2016 3:06 pm
by NYCLaker
If the Lakers get first pick, I think we are going to go for Fultz or DSJ. Ideally, if Giles was fit and healthy it be him as our future smallball center though.
Even though Jackson is a combo wingplayer, Fultz has better length than him as a PG.
A Fultz-Russell backcourt is what I envision for the Lakers.
Re: Fischella's NBA Mock Draft 2017
Posted: Sat Sep 3, 2016 4:06 pm
by reanimator
OG top 4? Miles Bridges lottery? I'm not the biggest Tatum fan but c'mon and Isaac/Mushidi will be a riser.
Re: Fischella's NBA Mock Draft 2017
Posted: Sat Sep 3, 2016 4:24 pm
by No-Man
reanimator wrote:OG top 4? Miles Bridges lottery? I'm not the biggest Tatum fan but c'mon and Isaac/Mushidi will be a riser.
I value defensive upside a ton, Anuboby has versatility and exactly what I am looking for in a Forward nowadays, his position carries value as well, although we have tons of Combo-Forwards in the league and in this class for that matter so that's going to go downwards a bit in the future.
I am a big fan of both Bridges, Miles needs to develop his shooting but he is an athletic strong combo that can playmake and rebound the ball, he plays hard too, I expect him to have a superb freshmen year.
I just dont like Tatum chances, he has a great midrange game, but his shooting is iffy and he doesnt pass much, nearly 0 two-way potential kills his value too, figures to be ball-dominant and not good enough to warrant it, likely gonna be a Combo-Forward and not a pure wing player in the future, that lowers his value as well.
Havent seen enough of Isaac, you could've something there, I need to check more tape, I am not a big fan of Mushidi, he is strong but basically plays bully ball, has not good mechanics and doesnt pass, big candidate to drop lower for me, he is going to put up numbers for Mega of course, but dunno about his long-term potential, at least Trier can shoot it for example.
Re: Fischella's NBA Mock Draft 2017
Posted: Mon Sep 5, 2016 7:22 pm
by skywalker33
Can't see the Nuggets selecting Bridges over Tatum or Isaac, just doesn't fit their needs IMO. Bridges reminds me of Barton so your choice creates redundancy
Re: Fischella's NBA Mock Draft 2017
Posted: Tue Sep 6, 2016 9:33 am
by No-Man
skywalker33 wrote:Can't see the Nuggets selecting Bridges over Tatum or Isaac, just doesn't fit their needs IMO. Bridges reminds me of Barton so your choice creates redundancy
How so? and even if he did, Barton is likely going to be shopped before his contract runs out.
Tatum is a worse athlete than Bridges with less defensive upside, Denver can use a combo-forward of the future to pair with what they have since Gallo might leave or get traded and Chandler is injured all the time.
Isaac is more of a pure PF, might be an option but I like Juancho a lot and he just got drafted.
Bridges is underrated I dont see how you see him similar to Barton other than both are high energy guys, Miles is a better passer and much stronger, Barton is a pure wing and Miles is more of a smallball 4, in my mind he projects to be a high level defensive player with versatility and passing, that can attack the basket and rebound, he is going to rise.
Re: Fischella's NBA Mock Draft 2017
Posted: Tue Sep 6, 2016 3:09 pm
by reanimator
Bridges is strong and a powerful leaper but I'm not seeing a a plus passer whatsoever. Also has a primitive handle and will measure between 6'4 and 6'6 with average length. I'm thinking PJ Tucker and I don't see that as lottery this year.
Re: Fischella's NBA Mock Draft 2017
Posted: Tue Sep 6, 2016 5:17 pm
by No-Man
reanimator wrote:Bridges is strong and a powerful leaper but I'm not seeing a a plus passer whatsoever. Also has a primitive handle and will measure between 6'4 and 6'6 with average length. I'm thinking PJ Tucker and I don't see that as lottery this year.
length could be an issue, but he is intriguing with his size, athleticism, speed and rebounding, hopefully passing and shooting will go upwards, he defends also, he is not as a long nor the athlete Winslow is, but they have similar body types.
I do like him as a lotto pick, not enough combo-forwards with upside, I like him better than Tatum.
Re: Fischella's NBA Mock Draft 2017
Posted: Thu Sep 8, 2016 7:59 pm
by skywalker33
Gotta agree with reanimator here, what you are projecting/predicting isn't proven and may/may not ever come true. Tatum is more of a proven scorer less of a defender but I like his ceiling more. Just have to disagree on that one.
Re: Fischella's NBA Mock Draft 2017
Posted: Mon Oct 17, 2016 2:55 am
by damecurry
Bam Abedayo and DeAron Fox dropping to the 20s would be... surprising, though as a Blazer fan I would have no complaint with either getting the 23rd pick or having him drop to us there. Sounds like an ideal situation to me

Re: Fischella's NBA Mock Draft 2017
Posted: Fri Oct 21, 2016 12:23 am
by No-Man
Gonna release a much improved version with new standings projections tomorrow
Re: Fischella's NBA Mock Draft 2017
Posted: Fri Oct 28, 2016 3:14 am
by skywalker33
Fischella wrote:Gonna release a much improved version with new standings projections tomorrow
We must have different definitions of "tomorrow". Know it takes a while to do one, look forward to see what you got next

Re: Fischella's NBA Mock Draft 2017
Posted: Mon Nov 14, 2016 4:51 pm
by No-Man
skywalker33 wrote:Fischella wrote:Gonna release a much improved version with new standings projections tomorrow
We must have different definitions of "tomorrow". Know it takes a while to do one, look forward to see what you got next

I know sorry about that, got derailed like crazy but I promise I'd be back with a board this week
Re: Fischella's NBA Mock Draft 2017
Posted: Thu Dec 1, 2016 1:36 pm
by PerkinsFor3
We must have different definitions of "this week". Know it takes a while to do one, look forward to see what you got next

Re: Fischella's NBA Mock Draft 2017
Posted: Thu Dec 1, 2016 4:41 pm
by No-Man
PerkinsFor3 wrote:We must have different definitions of "this week". Know it takes a while to do one, look forward to see what you got next

Nah it doesnt haha it just a mix between my computer been a trainwreck lately and me starting a new pod based on the draft, havent really had the time to put together a mock or board just forums related and I constantly changed stuff with the start of the season.
Re: Fischella's NBA Mock Draft 2017
Posted: Thu Dec 1, 2016 6:32 pm
by PerkinsFor3
Pulling your leg mate. Already posted this in another topic, but if you would rank players by tiers, who would be in the upper tier?
Re: Fischella's NBA Mock Draft 2017
Posted: Sun Dec 4, 2016 6:09 am
by dorkestra
Fischella wrote:PerkinsFor3 wrote:We must have different definitions of "this week". Know it takes a while to do one, look forward to see what you got next

Nah it doesnt haha it just a mix between my computer been a trainwreck lately and me starting a new pod based on the draft, havent really had the time to put together a mock or board just forums related and I constantly changed stuff with the start of the season.
Link me to your pod if you don't mind
Re: Fischella's NBA Mock Draft 2017
Posted: Mon Dec 5, 2016 8:46 pm
by No-Man
dorkestra wrote:Fischella wrote:PerkinsFor3 wrote:We must have different definitions of "this week". Know it takes a while to do one, look forward to see what you got next

Nah it doesnt haha it just a mix between my computer been a trainwreck lately and me starting a new pod based on the draft, havent really had the time to put together a mock or board just forums related and I constantly changed stuff with the start of the season.
Link me to your pod if you don't mind
fresh out of the oven
https://twitter.com/WhatsOnDraftPodyou can follow up updates there
Re: Fischella's NBA Mock Draft 2017
Posted: Tue Dec 6, 2016 1:18 am
by Mulhollanddrive
There's actual jobs involved in doing internet scouting?
Re: Fischella's NBA Mock Draft 2017
Posted: Sun Dec 11, 2016 5:19 pm
by darrendaye
Really a shame Ray Smith had to give up playing due to injury. I am late to the dance, but, agree with you that Josh Hart will go MUCH higher than most mocks predict, even at this point.