Stillwater's 2018 1st round mock 2.0
Posted: Sun Jun 10, 2018 10:54 pm
made some changes based on current buzz , subject to change again before the draft. https://basketball.realgm.com/nba/draft/draft_simulator/view/499598/
Sports is our Business
https://forums.realgm.com/boards/
https://forums.realgm.com/boards/viewtopic.php?f=38&t=1713795
Threezus wrote:Still why do you hate me broYou had 6 other players to choose from i would have been atleast somewhat happy with and gave us the 1 dude i would consider the draft a failure if we picked him at 3. Bagley, Ayton, and Doncic should be guaranteed locks to us if we stay at 3. Those are the elite tier 1 guys we need to come away with now if we go with Jackson we should trade to 7 or 8 and go from there while getting a ton of picks/players back. If we trade to 4 5 or 6 then i go Porter, Bamba as my tier 2 guys and Young as my tier 2.5 guy with JJJ starting tier 3.
Stillwater wrote:Threezus wrote:Still why do you hate me broYou had 6 other players to choose from i would have been atleast somewhat happy with and gave us the 1 dude i would consider the draft a failure if we picked him at 3. Bagley, Ayton, and Doncic should be guaranteed locks to us if we stay at 3. Those are the elite tier 1 guys we need to come away with now if we go with Jackson we should trade to 7 or 8 and go from there while getting a ton of picks/players back. If we trade to 4 5 or 6 then i go Porter, Bamba as my tier 2 guys and Young as my tier 2.5 guy with JJJ starting tier 3.
Jackson is having some of the best workouts of any of the bigs in the top 10 and could easily go #2 overall, I don't think ATL should pass on him, unless they feel Bagley's offense and motor are too good to pass up. not sure why you think so lowly of JJJ. He has the most complete 2-way package of any of the bigs despite not being elite at 1 or the other yet, is projecting to be just that at both. If JJJ goes 2nd Doncic and Bagley are there for the taking if that's ATL's goal. But yeah JJJ is a longer term prospect pick offensively than Ayton and Bagley despite being better defensively already and doesn't have the same elite length as Bamba but a better IQ and a better rim protector as a result.
dms269 wrote:Stillwater wrote:Threezus wrote:Still why do you hate me broYou had 6 other players to choose from i would have been atleast somewhat happy with and gave us the 1 dude i would consider the draft a failure if we picked him at 3. Bagley, Ayton, and Doncic should be guaranteed locks to us if we stay at 3. Those are the elite tier 1 guys we need to come away with now if we go with Jackson we should trade to 7 or 8 and go from there while getting a ton of picks/players back. If we trade to 4 5 or 6 then i go Porter, Bamba as my tier 2 guys and Young as my tier 2.5 guy with JJJ starting tier 3.
Jackson is having some of the best workouts of any of the bigs in the top 10 and could easily go #2 overall, I don't think ATL should pass on him, unless they feel Bagley's offense and motor are too good to pass up. not sure why you think so lowly of JJJ. He has the most complete 2-way package of any of the bigs despite not being elite at 1 or the other yet, is projecting to be just that at both. If JJJ goes 2nd Doncic and Bagley are there for the taking if that's ATL's goal. But yeah JJJ is a longer term prospect pick offensively than Ayton and Bagley despite being better defensively already and doesn't have the same elite length as Bamba but a better IQ and a better rim protector as a result.
I think most Atlanta fans dislike the pick because he isn't flashy. He isn't the stud offensive weapon that is going to be a 20 ppg scorer. He seems like a good 10-15 ppg glue piece whof can play defense and score some. I think most mocks love the idea of JJJ to the Hawks because of "fit" instead of giving them the most talented player overall.
I would rather gamble on a guy who could be a stud then take the safe "bet".