is this veto-worth?

trick · Post #1 » by **trick** » Wed Oct 22, 2008 4:21 pm

Team A trades:
Andrea Bargnani
Manu Ginobili

for

Team B trades
Luis Scola
Carl Landry
Brook Lopez

???

First thing that pops into my head is that Team A loses this trade indefinitely. But does he lose out so much that it should be vetoed? And FWIW, Team A tried to trade those two players for Turiaf,Radmanovic,Willie Green,Maurice Evans until it was vetoed so him hastily getting rid of Ginobili due to injury plays a role in this IMO.

pdxblazers92087 · Post #2 » by **pdxblazers92087** » Wed Oct 22, 2008 5:12 pm

I'd rather have Manu i mean hes only out for a month to two tops. Thats not bad considering hes going to be a top easy 60 player afterwards.

EJay33 · Post #3 » by **EJay33** » Wed Oct 22, 2008 7:05 pm

This trade is pretty bad. Ginobilli is clearly, far and away the best player in the trade. Bargs and Landry are about even. Lopez might do something this season but expectations should be modest. Scola is not even worth owning unless this is a very, very deep league. I'd actually consider voting against the trade, and def. wouldn't invite this guy to play in the league next year since he doesn't seem to understand that dumping Manu is a bad idea.

cokekong · Post #4 » by **cokekong** » Wed Oct 22, 2008 9:33 pm

i wouldn't veto the trade since it kinda sets a bad precedent to free trading and stuff. obviously like the posters above me said, i think that team A can get more for Manu, but given that he's injured, it's not absolutely ludicrous if team A is looking for production NOW.

robertjanssen007 · Post #5 » by **robertjanssen007** » Fri Oct 24, 2008 12:22 am

adding lopez in the deal gives an easy win to B but not veto-worthy.