18 team 9 cat roto 3 player keeper league
Team A has boozer, nelson, Deng, Robin lopez, Jason Thompson, Wilson Chandler, and KG as potential keepers
Team A has no shot at winning this year
The trade
Team A trades KG
Team B trades Tyrus Thomas
Team B is contending and has a stacked team where KG may not get off the bench and a 0 chance to keep KG.
Should this trade be veto'd?
should this be veto'd?
Moderators: floppymoose, Curtis Lemansky
should this be veto'd?
-
- Rookie
- Posts: 1,136
- And1: 216
- Joined: Dec 16, 2009
Re: should this be veto'd?
-
- Freshman
- Posts: 86
- And1: 6
- Joined: May 21, 2005
- Location: Canada
Re: should this be veto'd?
It doesn't really make any sense, so yeah I would probably veto. KG may be on the decline, but as a keeper I would take him over TT.
Re: should this be veto'd?
-
- Rookie
- Posts: 1,136
- And1: 216
- Joined: Dec 16, 2009
Re: should this be veto'd?
havlat wrote:It doesn't really make any sense, so yeah I would probably veto. KG may be on the decline, but as a keeper I would take him over TT.
you would keep KG over nelson boozer and deng? If not whats the point of KG, whereas TT probably wont be kept either but there is a chance he's traded to a good situation and becomes a keeper (on team A's team), so what do you have to lose by trading KG?
The trade was veto'd.
Re: should this be veto'd?
-
- Freshman
- Posts: 86
- And1: 6
- Joined: May 21, 2005
- Location: Canada
Re: should this be veto'd?
I would consider keeping KG over Nelson. He's certainly a better bet than TT, even if people love him around here.
Now, whether it should be vetoed really depends on the people in the league. Based on what you're saying it shouldn't have been vetoed, but if that trade went down in my league I wouldn't like it.
Now, whether it should be vetoed really depends on the people in the league. Based on what you're saying it shouldn't have been vetoed, but if that trade went down in my league I wouldn't like it.
Re: should this be veto'd?
-
- Sophomore
- Posts: 159
- And1: 0
- Joined: Oct 06, 2009
- Location: Toronto
- Contact:
Re: should this be veto'd?
No shouldnt be vetoed
KG is getting old, Tyrus has tons of upside, HUGE GAMBLE but a legit deal for a manger looking 2-3 years ahead
KG is getting old, Tyrus has tons of upside, HUGE GAMBLE but a legit deal for a manger looking 2-3 years ahead
Re: should this be veto'd?
- DeShaunRed
- Pro Prospect
- Posts: 845
- And1: 0
- Joined: Aug 20, 2004
- Location: PH
-
Re: should this be veto'd?
I would veto it, especially if it's going to give you an upperhand and we're in the same league. 
