Veto or No Veto? Durant for Billups+KevMart?

CableKC · Post #1 » by **CableKC** » Fri Nov 5, 2010 6:53 pm

I'm in a Standard Yahoo H2H 12 GM League and there is a Pending Trade of:

Durant for Billups+Kevin Martin

Is this a "Veto" or "No Veto" type of trade?

My thoughts are that it is a "Veto" on my end....but I wanted to get a greater sense of what most of you think.

Starkiller · Post #2 » by **Starkiller** » Fri Nov 5, 2010 7:01 pm

I would veto, but it's not that bad, but once Kevin Martin gets hurt then it just turned into a robbery.

CableKC · Post #3 » by **CableKC** » Fri Nov 5, 2010 7:06 pm

Thanks. Given that the GM that has Durant is a noob....I was going to suggest one of the following that would be more fair:

Josh Smith + AK47
Durant + Ben Wallace

or

Manu + AK47 + James Jones
Durant + Ben + Barbosa

Which one seems a more fair in terms of value for both Teams?

AlciG · Post #4 » by **AlciG** » Fri Nov 5, 2010 7:40 pm

Only thing wrong with that trade is that you want KD yourself... not veto worthy.

CableKC · Post #5 » by **CableKC** » Fri Nov 5, 2010 8:13 pm

AlciG wrote:Only thing wrong with that trade is that you want KD yourself... not veto worthy.

Im not the GM involved, so I don't get Durant in anyway.

Maybe I worded it wrong....the trade scenarios I mentioned involve the same 2 GMs that are doing the original trade and their Players as alternatives. Given that the Player getting Billups+KevMart ( while sending out Durant ) already has 3 Starting PGs ( Kidd, Devin and DreMiller ), adding in Billups makes no sense cuz there are only so many PGs that you can run in your roster. The above Players actually fits needs and holes on both of their rosters.

AlciG · Post #6 » by **AlciG** » Sat Nov 6, 2010 12:11 am

CableKC wrote:
AlciG wrote:Only thing wrong with that trade is that you want KD yourself... not veto worthy.

Im not the GM involved, so I don't get Durant in anyway.

Maybe I worded it wrong....the trade scenarios I mentioned involve the same 2 GMs that are doing the original trade and their Players as alternatives. Given that the Player getting Billups+KevMart ( while sending out Durant ) already has 3 Starting PGs ( Kidd, Devin and DreMiller ), adding in Billups makes no sense cuz there are only so many PGs that you can run in your roster. The above Players actually fits needs and holes on both of their rosters.

Sorry I misunderstood then... but still I wouldn't veto the trade. If I had Durant I would never do the trade, but I don't think its veto worthy.

Imadogg · Post #7 » by **Imadogg** » Sat Nov 6, 2010 11:45 am

Not veto-worthy. At first I read it as Durant+Billups for KMart and was appalled lol