Drop Sessions for Shumpert

call.me.dude · Post #1 » by **call.me.dude** » Thu Jan 5, 2012 3:59 am

Sessions or the GOAT PG?

My other PGs are Westbrook and Irving. I need assists badly, so Sessions is a good fit. But who do you think will be better?

Bank Shot · Post #2 » by **Bank Shot** » Thu Jan 5, 2012 5:35 am

If you need assists then keep Sessions. I like Shumpert's upside a little more but Sessions has been pretty steady besides tonight and its not like Shumpert doesn't have the same playing time issues as Sessions.

Rhyder78 · Post #3 » by **Rhyder78** » Thu Jan 5, 2012 7:01 pm

I've kind of been wondering the same thing today. My team:

PG: Augustin/Andre Miller
SG: Ray Allen/Thornton
SF: Jamison/Rip
PF: Amare/Garnett
C: Aldridge/Hawes
UtilG: Redick, Sessions
UtilF: Marvin Williams

Both Baron Davis and Iman are on the waivers. I could drop Sessions for Shumpert now with the hopes of picking up Baron Davis later. Although not sure I like the idea of having three Knicks on my team in the interest of getting everyone their starts.

I could also drop Rip or Marvin Williams for him, but I fear that would leave my lineup a little too imbalanced and leave too many guards actually playing games on the bench with open F slots in my starting roster.

call.me.dude · Post #4 » by **call.me.dude** » Thu Jan 5, 2012 9:51 pm

I now also have Kidd (pick him up off waivers) and am thinking about offering him for Rubio. Good deal for me? I think Kidd will still be around 6/4/8 + 2spg, but I can't imagine Rubio getting much worse (his PT and spg are only going to go up).