Al Harrington
Moderators: floppymoose, Curtis Lemansky
Al Harrington
-
- Ballboy
- Posts: 23
- And1: 0
- Joined: Jan 04, 2012
Al Harrington
Do you guys think that Al Harrington's value will dip considerably when the rest of the injured Nuggets get back into playing shape? I'm okay with a slight dip in his states, but I need at least 1.5 Threes, consistent double digit scoring and at least 5-6 rebounds from him a night... Is that asking too much?
Re: Al Harrington
- niQ
- Forum Mod - Raptors
- Posts: 15,996
- And1: 29,839
- Joined: Jun 14, 2011
Re: Al Harrington
For his career, he's 13.8 ppg, 5.7 rpg, 1.0 threes.
Last season, I had him and he sucked.. but this season he's been playing very well. But according to your requirements, I think it's safe to say he'll average double digit scoring, at least 5 rpg, and I'm assuming 1-1.5 three per game.
Last season, I had him and he sucked.. but this season he's been playing very well. But according to your requirements, I think it's safe to say he'll average double digit scoring, at least 5 rpg, and I'm assuming 1-1.5 three per game.
Re: Al Harrington
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 2,583
- And1: 39
- Joined: Aug 25, 2011
Re: Al Harrington
yes, there's a good chance he goes through a shooting slump. he's already pretty one-dimensional. he's an ultimate sell-high and should be traded asap
Re: Al Harrington
-
- Ballboy
- Posts: 23
- And1: 0
- Joined: Jan 04, 2012
Re: Al Harrington
Can you target any players that you think I could get for him? Most of my league is very basketball savvy, so I probably couldn't pull the wool over anybody's eyes. Maybe a Marcus Thornton or a Thaddeus Young?
Re: Al Harrington
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 2,583
- And1: 39
- Joined: Aug 25, 2011
Re: Al Harrington
if they're that basketball savvy i'd do my due diligence, propose a bunch of trades and if no one bites, just ride him out until he starts regressing and then drop him promptly
i rarely do 1-for-1s and team composition is responsible for any kind of proposal you throw out there so i don't know how much good throwing names out would be. just follow the cardinal rule of trades and you should be good: you gotta give up something to get something. so you're giving up harrington, who is risk. then expect to trade for risk. just be better at evaluating risk than your trade partner -shrugs-
i rarely do 1-for-1s and team composition is responsible for any kind of proposal you throw out there so i don't know how much good throwing names out would be. just follow the cardinal rule of trades and you should be good: you gotta give up something to get something. so you're giving up harrington, who is risk. then expect to trade for risk. just be better at evaluating risk than your trade partner -shrugs-