Tony Parker for Gerald Wallace was vetoed by commish.

Fantasy Ball talk.

Moderators: floppymoose, Curtis Lemansky

GrapeApe
Pro Prospect
Posts: 819
And1: 14
Joined: Oct 25, 2004
Location: Where bananas grow

Tony Parker for Gerald Wallace was vetoed by commish. 

Post#1 » by GrapeApe » Thu Nov 1, 2012 7:17 pm

Do you agree or no?

If it matters Parker is ranked #60 and Wallace #48. It is a head to head standard scoring league with 12 teams.
cochiseuofm
Veteran
Posts: 2,812
And1: 609
Joined: Mar 21, 2007
       

Re: Tony Parker for Gerald Wallace was vetoed by commish. 

Post#2 » by cochiseuofm » Thu Nov 1, 2012 7:25 pm

No that is dumb. In H2H leagues teams try to win with different strategies and Wallace easily could be more valuable than Parker if your goal is to win defensive stats every week. On the flip side, Parker could be worth more than Wallace if you value assists and points more.
User avatar
Cobra Kai Dojo
Sophomore
Posts: 232
And1: 18
Joined: Jun 10, 2011
     

Re: Tony Parker for Gerald Wallace was vetoed by commish. 

Post#3 » by Cobra Kai Dojo » Thu Nov 1, 2012 9:12 pm

Rankings probably didn't matter so much in this decision, probably had more to do with the teams, need more info on team strategies.
TheToothFairy
Banned User
Posts: 6,089
And1: 297
Joined: Jun 27, 2011
Location: Under Your Pillow

Re: Tony Parker for Gerald Wallace was vetoed by commish. 

Post#4 » by TheToothFairy » Fri Nov 2, 2012 1:48 am

Not a veto, very stupid
iTzJeff
Ballboy
Posts: 47
And1: 0
Joined: Oct 04, 2012

Re: Tony Parker for Gerald Wallace was vetoed by commish. 

Post#5 » by iTzJeff » Fri Nov 2, 2012 4:25 pm

This should not have been vetoed by your commish, especially in h2h. They both produce around the same in different areas. Should have been put to vote instead of a power hungry commish. Extremely stupid veto imo.

Return to Fantasy Basketball