Do you agree or no?
If it matters Parker is ranked #60 and Wallace #48. It is a head to head standard scoring league with 12 teams.
Tony Parker for Gerald Wallace was vetoed by commish.
Moderators: floppymoose, Curtis Lemansky
Tony Parker for Gerald Wallace was vetoed by commish.
-
- Pro Prospect
- Posts: 819
- And1: 14
- Joined: Oct 25, 2004
- Location: Where bananas grow
Re: Tony Parker for Gerald Wallace was vetoed by commish.
-
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,812
- And1: 609
- Joined: Mar 21, 2007
-
Re: Tony Parker for Gerald Wallace was vetoed by commish.
No that is dumb. In H2H leagues teams try to win with different strategies and Wallace easily could be more valuable than Parker if your goal is to win defensive stats every week. On the flip side, Parker could be worth more than Wallace if you value assists and points more.
Re: Tony Parker for Gerald Wallace was vetoed by commish.
- Cobra Kai Dojo
- Sophomore
- Posts: 232
- And1: 18
- Joined: Jun 10, 2011
-
Re: Tony Parker for Gerald Wallace was vetoed by commish.
Rankings probably didn't matter so much in this decision, probably had more to do with the teams, need more info on team strategies.
Re: Tony Parker for Gerald Wallace was vetoed by commish.
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 6,089
- And1: 297
- Joined: Jun 27, 2011
- Location: Under Your Pillow
Re: Tony Parker for Gerald Wallace was vetoed by commish.
Not a veto, very stupid
Re: Tony Parker for Gerald Wallace was vetoed by commish.
-
- Ballboy
- Posts: 47
- And1: 0
- Joined: Oct 04, 2012
Re: Tony Parker for Gerald Wallace was vetoed by commish.
This should not have been vetoed by your commish, especially in h2h. They both produce around the same in different areas. Should have been put to vote instead of a power hungry commish. Extremely stupid veto imo.