batum and ellis for westbrook and hickson

[StreetsAhead]

My team currently:

pg: irving
sg: batum
g: ellis
sf: gallo
pf: carl landry
f: klay
c: dwight
c: favors
u: beal
u: collison
bn: scola
bn: asik
bn: waiters

standard yahoo 9 cat h2h 12 teams.

Should I give up batum and ellis for westbrook and hickson? I like the amount of shooters I have to offset dwight's poor ft%. I've actually managed to win ft% for a couple of weeks. Giving up two shooters will hurt, but is a chance to get a top 5 overall guy like westbrook worth it?

[TheToothFairy]

My team currently:

pg: irving
sg: batum
g: ellis
sf: gallo
pf: carl landry
f: klay
c: dwight
c: favors
u: beal
u: collison
bn: scola
bn: asik
bn: waiters

standard yahoo 9 cat h2h 12 teams.

Should I give up batum and ellis for westbrook and hickson? I like the amount of shooters I have to offset dwight's poor ft%. I've actually managed to win ft% for a couple of weeks. Giving up two shooters will hurt, but is a chance to get a top 5 overall guy like westbrook worth it?

U do need another pg but I would keep Batum and Ellis

[Bank Shot]

Batum is the best guy in the deal and obviously Monta > Hickson so I wouldn't.

[Apathy]

Westbrook > or = to Batum but Ellis >> Hickson. If you want another PG just do Batum for Westbrook straight up.