RealGM

the only catagories i need are 3pm and stls which is why the drop from williams to kidd is acceptable. I feel duncan has another year in him where he can at least out produce dalembert

i gave up williams and dalembert, do you think i got ripped off. did i do the ripping? will my trade get vetoed?

good deal imo. deron will get 1-2 more apg, not a huge drop off , kidd can definitely anchor ur asts. of corse you lose a lotta points but get them back w/ duncan (most of them). kings frontcourt is packed, and i doubt sammy d puts up the same numbers in philly. i'd rather have kidd and td in this trade. shouldnt get vetoed.

I agree, Kidd+Duncan >>>>>>>>>DWill/Dally.

Even though Dally has said that Sac wants more Offense out of him, Cousins will be their C of the future. I see them splitting the minutes between the 2.

as an optimist, it hard to imagine sammy d avg more than 12pts. i think its a bad ideo for the kings. in the kings board they say he's only gonna get a few more shots, i hope that's true. cuz they got CARL LANDRY who's their best offensive big. thompson was at 15ppg till january when martin came back.

sammy d is their best defensive big, that should've been the reason they got him. if they do give him a buncha shots, i think that project will fail and by jan/end dec they'll go to landry and thompson. they should look at ariza's numbers last season before the tmac trade as a reference.

also if he shoots more he might get less fg%. they could have landry as a trading piece, makes some sense since its a contract year. but thats why they should keep him. they'd have 2 scoring bigs, and sammy d for defense, and a rookie cousins. i wouldnt worry too much about this. he cant go the whole year w/ 15 shots at 45fg%, when landry is at 10pts w/ prolly 70fg% due to lack shots. i hope to god they dont do this