Page 1 of 1
Veto worthy? rondo/3 players for felton/3 players
Posted: Sun Dec 19, 2010 4:07 pm
by dockingsched
rondo/a. thornton/morrow/belinelli
for
felton/gibson/cj miles/mcroberts
fg%/ft%/3ptm/pts/rebs/ast/blks/st/to
seems like felton is side is getting the short end of the stick, let me know please.
Re: Veto worthy? rondo/3 players for felton/3 players
Posted: Sun Dec 19, 2010 4:22 pm
by hamncheese
Not veto-worthy. Trade favors side receiving Felton given Rondo's health and that Felton has had the better season so far. Not sure if that will last but I like the 3 others in the Felton side over the 3 others in the Rondo side.
Re: Veto worthy? rondo/3 players for felton/3 players
Posted: Sun Dec 19, 2010 6:01 pm
by DNYLkiller
It's clean
Re: Veto worthy? rondo/3 players for felton/3 players
Posted: Mon Dec 20, 2010 1:57 am
by AdamTheGreek
No, not worth a veto.
Re: Veto worthy? rondo/3 players for felton/3 players
Posted: Mon Dec 20, 2010 9:14 am
by alexcuse
felton>rondo
gibson>thornton
miles>morrow
mcroberts>belinelli
not sure veto-worthy but trade is definitely one-sided.
Re: Veto worthy? rondo/3 players for felton/3 players
Posted: Wed Dec 22, 2010 5:52 pm
by dockingsched
thanks for the opinions
Re: Veto worthy? rondo/3 players for felton/3 players
Posted: Wed Dec 22, 2010 6:56 pm
by CableKC
IMHO....slight edge to whoever is getting the Rondo package...but overall...the trade isn't too imbalenced....so ( as many have noted ) it's not vetoable.