Paul George or Danilo Gallinari

LeetGoose · Post #1 » by **LeetGoose** » Fri Jan 6, 2012 9:26 pm

I've been trying to improve my 3PT% but would giving up Gallinari for George be worth it?

ChrispShots · Post #2 » by **ChrispShots** » Sat Jan 7, 2012 6:11 pm

George has been on fire from 3pt land so I would take him over Gallo.

mavfan12 · Post #3 » by **mavfan12** » Sat Jan 7, 2012 8:06 pm

I like George this year but Gallo's definitely worth more. He's a 36-37% career 3pt who's just off to a slow start. He'll also be Denver's leading scorer this year while George will be 3rd option behind Granger and West.

stephGRAHAMbury · Post #4 » by **stephGRAHAMbury** » Sat Jan 7, 2012 9:04 pm

Can't really go wrong with either one. Gallo is more of a known commodity so I'd feel safer with him long-term.

George will probably be more consistent at getting you utility stats like steals and blocks, but his three-point shooting will cool down eventually and as a scorer Gallo will end ranked ahead of him.

One of the "hidden" benefits to Gallo that I don't project George replicating is his impact on FT%. Gallo takes a good amount of FTA for a wing player and converts them at a great rate which will really help to boost your FT% on a week to week basis.

LeetGoose · Post #5 » by **LeetGoose** » Sat Jan 7, 2012 10:52 pm

Thanks for the info, I'l stick with Gallo.