Page 1 of 1
Tony Parker for Gerald Wallace was vetoed by commish.
Posted: Thu Nov 1, 2012 7:17 pm
by GrapeApe
Do you agree or no?
If it matters Parker is ranked #60 and Wallace #48. It is a head to head standard scoring league with 12 teams.
Re: Tony Parker for Gerald Wallace was vetoed by commish.
Posted: Thu Nov 1, 2012 7:25 pm
by cochiseuofm
No that is dumb. In H2H leagues teams try to win with different strategies and Wallace easily could be more valuable than Parker if your goal is to win defensive stats every week. On the flip side, Parker could be worth more than Wallace if you value assists and points more.
Re: Tony Parker for Gerald Wallace was vetoed by commish.
Posted: Thu Nov 1, 2012 9:12 pm
by Cobra Kai Dojo
Rankings probably didn't matter so much in this decision, probably had more to do with the teams, need more info on team strategies.
Re: Tony Parker for Gerald Wallace was vetoed by commish.
Posted: Fri Nov 2, 2012 1:48 am
by TheToothFairy
Not a veto, very stupid
Re: Tony Parker for Gerald Wallace was vetoed by commish.
Posted: Fri Nov 2, 2012 4:25 pm
by iTzJeff
This should not have been vetoed by your commish, especially in h2h. They both produce around the same in different areas. Should have been put to vote instead of a power hungry commish. Extremely stupid veto imo.