Am I getting screwed or what??
Posted: Fri Nov 9, 2012 7:44 pm
My league is totally screwing me over and I don't understand why no one in my league realizes it.
Here's the scenario:
- I was offered a deal yesterday .. Tony Parker for Kyle Lowry (I get Lowry). Now Lowry has been playing off the charts but he injured himself last game so the injury concerns lowered his value. I felt it was worth the risk and agreed to the trade.
- The trade gets approved by the commissioner and it's good to go. No one complains or says anything about it
It turns out the guy who traded for Parker intended to flip him and had worked out a very lopsided offer for DWade. He intentionally didn't tell me he was planning on flipping Parker so I had no idea.
- His second trade gets accepted by both sides but isn't approved by the commish. everyone in the league complains about it and they plan on vetoing it.
-The guy who made the trade says that the only reason he traded Lowry was so he could flip Parker and demands that he gets Lowry back if the trade gets vetoed.
-Obviously I disagree because i had nothing to do with the second trade. I didn't know about it, we never agreed to that stipulation and as far as I'm concerned he took a risk and it didn't work out.
Now for some strange reason the league is siding with him and they want to reverse BOTH trades. Does this make any sense to anyone? How is this my responsibly and how can they penalize me for something I didn't even know about? No one complained about my trade until after the subsequent trade was disputed. Worst of all, this discussion didn't start until 24 hours after the Lowry/Parker trade went through so I'm missing Parker in my lineup today.
To me this situation is incredibly messed. If I was the one that took that risk there's no way I'd expect to get my original guy back if it didn't work out. I mean, if it was a three way trade where the first was contingent on the second then that'd be different. But that wasn't the case at all. Am I crazy or this league ****?
Here's the scenario:
- I was offered a deal yesterday .. Tony Parker for Kyle Lowry (I get Lowry). Now Lowry has been playing off the charts but he injured himself last game so the injury concerns lowered his value. I felt it was worth the risk and agreed to the trade.
- The trade gets approved by the commissioner and it's good to go. No one complains or says anything about it
It turns out the guy who traded for Parker intended to flip him and had worked out a very lopsided offer for DWade. He intentionally didn't tell me he was planning on flipping Parker so I had no idea.
- His second trade gets accepted by both sides but isn't approved by the commish. everyone in the league complains about it and they plan on vetoing it.
-The guy who made the trade says that the only reason he traded Lowry was so he could flip Parker and demands that he gets Lowry back if the trade gets vetoed.
-Obviously I disagree because i had nothing to do with the second trade. I didn't know about it, we never agreed to that stipulation and as far as I'm concerned he took a risk and it didn't work out.
Now for some strange reason the league is siding with him and they want to reverse BOTH trades. Does this make any sense to anyone? How is this my responsibly and how can they penalize me for something I didn't even know about? No one complained about my trade until after the subsequent trade was disputed. Worst of all, this discussion didn't start until 24 hours after the Lowry/Parker trade went through so I'm missing Parker in my lineup today.
To me this situation is incredibly messed. If I was the one that took that risk there's no way I'd expect to get my original guy back if it didn't work out. I mean, if it was a three way trade where the first was contingent on the second then that'd be different. But that wasn't the case at all. Am I crazy or this league ****?