RealGM

Keeper League, 5 keepers. 12 team 7 cat (no fg%)
C Howard,Bynum, Pek
PF Brow, Zbo, Drummond
SF Gay, Kwahi
SG JJ Redick, JR Smith
PG Lillard, Wall
Already traded my 10th pick. Now I only have 6,7,8,9,11,12,12
Now if I trade my 7th pick I will only have 6,8,9,11,11,12,12

The old trade where I only gave up the 9th pick was vetoed and they said to either give up Drummond or the 7th in order for the trade to go through.
What do you guys think? I think doing this trade will put me in contention.

I can even then start doing two for 1 trades for a better player and pick up someone off waivers.

What do you all think?

So you're trading away your dead weight and future to win now. Any you're riding on the theory you can still win with what's available on the WW once you're able to start shipping off players in 2 for 1.

It comes down to whether you think you can pry 5 keepers from your opponents. Right now it's what Howard, Horford, Davis, Gay and either Zbo or Lillard.

Then you have to factor in whether Drummond is more valuable than someone in the 7th rd next year? I would lean towards no. Besides he's not going to be on anyone's keeper list so I'd rather have my 7th rd pick and just draft Drummond again next year with it if you think he's that valuable. Assuming the WW currently is deep enough to collect something of value now with the loss of Drummond.

Besides with no FG% cat. don't a lot of your PF/C loose value?

I would say loosing Bynum, Wall and Drummond is worth it if you think you can then consolidate the talent for next year while still contending this year.

Thanks sweet. I actually am super high on Drummond.

I would keep Lillard as Zbo is redudant with my other bigs.

I am really trying to pry Rajon Rondo from someone else once I get Parker and Horford as I always suck at assists and steals. What do you think would be a good offer.

She always wins assists and steals. Loses reboudns and blocks. is so so in points.

Here is her team.

Here is her team.
C Duncan/Okafor/Chandler
PF Steve Novak
SF Pierce, Jason Richarson
SG Lou Williams/Dudley
PG Rondo, Kemba, Lowry

The first trade wasn't veto-worthy. Short, speedy PGs who can't shoot (Parker) have absurdly high attrition rates once they hit 30. The Wall/Parker side of the equation makes me queasy. Get a new league.

Apathy wrote:The first trade wasn't veto-worthy. Short, speedy PGs who can't shoot (Parker) have absurdly high attrition rates once they hit 30. The Wall/Parker side of the equation makes me queasy. Get a new league.

They vetoed because they said Bynum won't play again and if he does he won't be anywhere near as good as Horford. That was the main crux of it.

Also because that guy is a horrible trader.

He traded Westbrook and Mullins for Batum/Manimal early in the season.

Then is trying to trade Batum 12th for Kidd and 10th. Because he has given up on this season and is trying to load up on draft picks.

I simply hate leagues that veto anything. If the league isn't grown-up enough to allow managers to make their own mistakes, to be horrible, and to kick out bad owners, then it's not one worth being in. But I value my space over everything. Just my two cents.

Apathy wrote:I simply hate leagues that veto anything. If the league isn't grown-up enough to allow managers to make their own mistakes, to be horrible, and to kick out bad owners, then it's not one worth being in. But I value my space over everything. Just my two cents.

Agreed. Having said that I am definitely doing this trade.

I want to pawn 2 for 1 for Rondo. Who do you think I can do that with?

I was thinking something like Parker/Drummond. Thoughts?

Agreed , I don't like Veros either.

My league has a veto policie for new players only because it's a keeper league and rookies tend to do some stupid ISh