Should this trade be vetoed?

SHAQ32 · Post #1 » by **SHAQ32** » Tue Dec 5, 2017 8:50 pm

Kemba, Beal, Ingram for Anthony Davis?

12 team, 9 cat

Post #2 » by **ThunderBolt** » Tue Dec 5, 2017 9:28 pm

To me it’s easier to know if both teams rosters are posted. I wouldn’t give up that much for Davis. Most likely the team receiving walker, Ingram and Beal will have to drop players. Why not just add the dropped players into the trade to make it more even?

Asian Celtic · Post #3 » by **Asian Celtic** » Wed Dec 6, 2017 6:17 am

it's likely Kemba, Beal, Ingram for Anthony Davis + waiver + waiver. In a 12 team 9 cat I don't think you can find good ones in the waiver especially if you're in a very competitive / money league. I'd take Kemba, Beal, and Ingram's value a little above AD. But if you're stacked all around or building a Punt assis team then AD ain't so bad to take the risk with his health invoolved.

Bakuto · Post #4 » by **Bakuto** » Wed Dec 6, 2017 2:57 pm

Probably not. The person trading AD is getting must own players, two of which are likely second and third round picks. Ingram is also a nice piece to have. I actually hope the guy getting AD has good enough depth to lose all the scoring he's getting.

pootbrah · Post #5 » by **pootbrah** » Fri Dec 8, 2017 9:42 am

I used Ingram as a throw in to a deal earlier this year. semi regret it but nah that is a fair deal.

Karate Diop · Post #6 » by **Karate Diop** » Fri Dec 8, 2017 4:04 pm

I was the commish for a league that ranged from 16-20 teams for about 8-10 years... My policy was always that I wouldn't veto trades just because they were bad.

But I would veto a trade if it was made in bad faith (collusion, someone clearly trying to help a friend / screw the league, etc.)

If you don't have any reason to believe that the two teams are colluding - and both teams think they're getting a good deal I'd let the deal go through (regardless of whether the value is fair / other teams are claiming they would have offered more).

Just my 2 cents. Good luck.