Should starting two RBs be the standard in Fantasy Football?
Posted: Thu Nov 26, 2020 12:58 pm
Sorry, this is basically a preseason thread, but I have a friend that insists that is the way to go for our league next year -- only start one RB, 3 WRs and a flex.
He thinks it's more a passing league now, so the standard should be 1 RB, 3 WRs, and a flex. I don't think it's a bad idea to have 3 WRs, but I think 1 RB is a terrible idea.
There's more skill in finding good RBs in fantasy over WRs due to the lack of depth at the position compared to WR, so I think that should remaind the standard.
Your thoughts?
https://192168o1.com.br/
https://19216801login.com.br/
https://logintplink.com.br/
He thinks it's more a passing league now, so the standard should be 1 RB, 3 WRs, and a flex. I don't think it's a bad idea to have 3 WRs, but I think 1 RB is a terrible idea.
There's more skill in finding good RBs in fantasy over WRs due to the lack of depth at the position compared to WR, so I think that should remaind the standard.
Your thoughts?
https://192168o1.com.br/
https://19216801login.com.br/
https://logintplink.com.br/