RealGM

I'm giving Granger / Bogans for Jamison. I think i get the better end of the deal. My question is... do you think its unfair? Its a cash league so not like he wants to lose. But i'm the commish for the 2nd year... and i'd hate to look bad. I think it might get veto'd as my team is looking strong, even though we agreed not to veto trades since we all paid in and know eachother.

i would say the deal clearly favors you. Bogans is an ok throw in but his production is easily found in the FA pool

since you mentioned it's a cash league i would think the GM's are a little more uptight then a public league and may make a fuss about the deal

actually with a 12 team league.. youd be surprised what you can get as a FA... Last year it was perfect i got al jefferson, barbosa, etc... this year its very very slim pickings.

I apprecaite your opinion though, i guess i'll just have to wait and see.

that trade will proabably get declined. Heck it would get declined in my league and im friends with everyone in it. But the Jamision side is a lot better

Essentially the trade is Granger for Jamison. In a one-year league, Jamison gets the nod.

got veto'd... surprise suprise. Do you guys think Granger / Hinrich for Jamison / Ford has a better chance. Ford MIGHT not even come back this season. Hinrich is turning his game around.

that offer is more reasonable. this Jamison owner must hate UNC alums and/or his lack contributions for a pf

im not to sure.... granger pretty much does beat out jamison in every cat other than scoring / rebounds. I had made the original trade about 2 weeks ago and he just recently accepted it. Either way i dont know, he might be tanking it or something.