RealGM

Here's the deal. we've got two teams in our league who want to make IMO a ridiculous trade:

Okafor
Bibby
Tim Thomas

for

Odom
Duncan

and because its a 3 for 2, the team getting the 3 is planning on dropping Cassell from his roster.

this trade to me seems so lopsided its not even fair.

why so lopsided?

no major stud involved... lots of question marks for both sides.

not a great deal imo, but not at all vetoable.

the way i see it is:

Duncan for Okafor - Duncan CLEAR winner
Odom for Bibby - HUGE questionmark
Thomas for Cassell - i see cassell as having more value than Thomas, AND their are a handful of other FA players who i'd rather have.

Duncan and Odom for Okafor and Bibby just doesnt seem like fair value to me.

eh its a dumb move for the guy sure, but its not insane enough to veto.