Page 1 of 1
Are these trades veto worthy??
Posted: Tue Oct 14, 2008 1:39 am
by ITdude
1. Ben Gorden, J.R. Smith for Andrei Kirlenko (guy trading Kirlenko wants more guards and 3 point shooting)
2. Marcus Camby for Ray Allen, Grant Hill (same guy trading Camby for the same reason)
I realize he's trading for needs, but I feel its too lopsided.
Re: Are these trades veto worthy??
Posted: Tue Oct 14, 2008 4:01 am
by Carlton Banksy
No, not veto worthy.
Re: Are these trades veto worthy??
Posted: Tue Oct 14, 2008 11:14 am
by Curtis Lemansky
The first one looks very fair to me.
The second one is a bit loopsided and he probably could get something more in return for a top-10 player like Camby but if he believes that his rebounds and blocks will take a significant hit with Kaman and also with age/inury concerns,I think he may agree on that deal.I wouldnt have done it but I think it is not veto worthy.
Re: Are these trades veto worthy??
Posted: Tue Oct 14, 2008 2:42 pm
by McFurious1
Camby is very injury prone too, but I wouldn't trade him for Ray Allen.
Bad trade close but not veto worthy.