Page 1 of 1
Vetoable?
Posted: Sat Dec 27, 2008 5:56 am
by Ishta
H2H, 12 teams standard CAT
Jose Calderon (Tor - PG)
Michael Redd (Mil - SG,SF)
Drew Gooden (Chi - PF,C)
Joe Johnson (Atl - PG,SG)
Brad Miller (Sac - C)
For
Derrick Rose (Chi - PG)
Chris Paul (NO - PG)
Tyson Chandler (NO - C)
Rajon Rondo (Bos - PG)
Is this trade vetoable? Which side wins in this trade?
Re: Vetoable?
Posted: Sat Dec 27, 2008 6:32 am
by OzSonic
No, I wouldn't think so.
A lot of players involved though!
Re: Vetoable?
Posted: Sat Dec 27, 2008 9:11 am
by -[P]-
Not vetoable, but indeed a lot of players involved, so hard to judge. In my opinion, this trade is pretty equal.
Re: Vetoable?
Posted: Sat Dec 27, 2008 9:22 pm
by andonewheel
I think side 2 clearly wins, but I wouldn't say it is vetoable.
Re: Vetoable?
Posted: Sun Dec 28, 2008 9:09 am
by Young_Star11
Not vetoable. Whilst CP3 is the #1 player, JJ is a top-15 talent this season. The JJ side gets some proven performers. The CP3 side gets a dud (IMO) in Chandler, and whilst Rondo and Rose are good, it would throw that team's balance out of kilter too. I can see the point for both teams.
Re: Vetoable?
Posted: Sun Dec 28, 2008 10:45 am
by Dark Star
rose, paul, and rondo are all having stellar years and redd/chandler are def off so far so the second team wins by a mile imo. Veto is up to you but its not balanced at all.
Re: Vetoable?
Posted: Sun Dec 28, 2008 1:14 pm
by sabonis
Ishta wrote:H2H, 12 teams standard CAT
Jose Calderon (Tor - PG)
Michael Redd (Mil - SG,SF)
Drew Gooden (Chi - PF,C)
Joe Johnson (Atl - PG,SG)
Brad Miller (Sac - C)
For
Derrick Rose (Chi - PG)
Chris Paul (NO - PG)
Tyson Chandler (NO - C)
Rajon Rondo (Bos - PG)
Is this trade vetoable? Which side wins in this trade?
if you can't tell which side wins at the first glance, a trade is not vetoable...