RealGM

I was wondering who I should add to my roster that would help me in the long run. I have two choices, Chris Kaman or Jermaine O'Neal. Only reason I think O'Neal would be good is because he did great yesterday with 22 pts 12 rebs and 4 assists. Chris Kaman on the other hand so far in 2 games has 40 points and 25 rebounds.


Which would be better in the long run?

Kaman, no contest.

Whoever doesn't get hurt first. My money's on Kaman lasting longer.

Jermaine did have a sick first game...but he is injury prone. Him and Beasley are basically taking care of things down low.

On the other hand...Kaman is basically the go-to guy in the paint. He cleans a lot of stuff up, and he is less of an injury risk then Jermaine. I would go with Kaman.

Chris Kaman remaining contract years: 3
Jermaine O'Neal remaining contract years: 1

J.O. has more of an incentive to stay healthy this season. Kaman has seemed to be a bit injury prone ever since signing his 5 year $50 million deal.

hey, i would definitly go with kaman, o'neal has a tendecy of getting injured, safer bet

got a question of my own i got proposed a deal of durant and oden for james, im lacking a good big that gets a lot of rebounds but i dont really want to loose james

thoughts?

Jermaine put those #s up against the Knicks, they won't continue like that vs. normal front lines. Go with Kaman.